Soil quality enhancement in arecanut (Areca catechu)-based agroforestry system: Insights from organic farming and integrated nutrient management
440 / 317
Keywords:
Fertility, Mixed farming system, Productivity, Soil health, Soil microbial activityAbstract
Enhancing soil productivity through appropriate land management practices aligns agricultural output with improved ecosystem services. A field survey was undertaken among 70 farmers in five major arecanut (Areca catechu L.) growing subdivisions of Goa: Ponda, Bicholim, Satari, Pernem, and Canacona This research aimed to quantitatively assess the effects of nutrient management practices namely no manure (NM), organic manure (OM), and integrated nutrient management (INM), on soil quality in an arecanut-based agroforestry system. The study was carried out during 2021–22 focusing on seven key soil parameters such as microbial biomass carbon (MBC), bulk density (BD), soil organic carbon (SOC), Zn, Mn, P, and B to establish a minimum data set (MDS), which was then converted into a soil quality index using non-linear scoring functions. The results showed that organic farming yielded a significantly higher soil quality index (0.61), followed by integrated nutrient management (0.58). The findings suggest that implementing organic farming techniques alongside effective crop management strategies is crucial for maximizing the potential of arecanut-based agroforestry systems to boost soil quality and achieve long-term sustainability.
Downloads
References
Albizua A, Williams A, Hedlund K and Pascual U. 2015. Crop rotations including ley and manure can promote ecosystem services in conventional farming systems. Applied Soil Ecology 95: 54–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.06.003
Andrews and Carroll C R. 2001. Designing a soil quality assessment tool for sustainable agroecosystem management. Ecological Applications 11: 1573–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1573:DASQAT]2.0.CO;2
Andrews S S, Karlen D L and Mitchell J P. 2002. A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California. Agriculture Ecosystem and Environment 90: 25–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00174-8
Ango T G, Börjeson L, Senbeta F and Hylander K. 2014. Balancing ecosystem services and disservices: smallholder farmers’ use and management of forest and trees in an agricultural landscape in southwestern Ethiopia. Ecology and Society 19: 30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06279-190130
Baishya L K, Rathore S S, Singh D, Sarkar D and Deka B C. 2015. Effect of integrated nutrient management on rice productivity, profitability and soil fertility. Annals of Plant Soil Research 17: 86–90.
Bhatti I H, Ahmad R, Jabbar A, Nazir M S and Mahmood T. 2006. Competitive behaviour of component crops in different sesame-legume intercropping systems. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 8: 165–67.
Cerda R, Allinne C and Gary C. 2017. Effects of shade, altitude and management on multiple ecosystem services in coffee agroecosystems. European Journal of Agronomy 82: 308–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.09.019
Cerda R, Deheuvels O and Calvache D. 2014. Contribution of cocoa agroforestry systems to family income and domestic consumption: looking toward intensification. Agroforestry System 88: 957–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9691-8
Dodiya, Gadhiya A and Patel G D. 2018. A review: Effect of inter cropping in horticultural crops. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7: 1512–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.702.182
Hairiah K, Sulistyani H, Suprayogo D, Purnomosidhi P, Widodo R H and Van N M. 2006. Litter layer residence time in forest and coffee agroforestry systems in Sumberjaya, West Lampung. Forest Ecology and Management 224: 45–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.12.007
Kumar R M, Yamanura and Boraiah B. 2021. Bio-irrigation: A drought alleviation strategy through induced hydro- parasitization under bi-cropping practices of rainfed agro- ecosystem: A review. Agricultural Reviews 43: 211–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.R-2139
Lara-Pulido J A, Guevara-Sanginés A and Arias M C. 2018. A meta-analysis of economic valuation of ecosystem services in Mexico. Ecosystem Services 31: 126–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.018
Majumder B, Mandal B and Bandyopadhyay P K. 2008. Organic amendments influence soil organic carbon pools and rice- wheat productivity. Soil Science Society of America Journal 72: 775–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2006.0378
Palaniswami C, Thomas G V, Dhanapal R, Subramanian P, Maheswarappa H P and Upadhyay A K. 2007, Integrated nutrient management in coconut based cropping system. Technical bulletin No. 49. pp. 24. Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod.
Roy S S and Hore J K. 2011. Effect of different bio-organic inputs on growth, yield and economics of turmeric grown as intercrop in arecanut plantation. Indian Journal of Horticulture 68: 375–78.
Saha R, Mishra V K, Majumdar B, Laxminarayana K and Ghosh P K. 2010. Effect of integrated nutrient management on soil physical properties and crop productivity under a maize (Zea mays)–mustard (Brassica campestris) cropping sequence in acidic soils of Northeast India. Soil Science and Plant Analysis 41: 2187–2200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2010.504799
Sujatha S and Bhat R. 2012. Impacts of vermicompost and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium application on soil fertility status in arecanut grown on a laterite Soil. Soil Science and Plant Analysis 43: 2400–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2012.708074
Sujatha S and Bhat R. 2013. Impact of drip fertigation on arecanut–cocoa system in humid tropics of India. Agroforestry Systems 87: 643–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9585-6
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.