A multi-dimensional analysis of integrated farming system in salt-affected ecologies


204 / 210 / 70

Authors

  • RAJKUMAR ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana132 001, India image/svg+xml
  • SURESH KUMAR ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana132 001, India image/svg+xml
  • RAM KISHOR FAGODIYA ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana132 001, India image/svg+xml
  • AWTAR SINGH ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana132 001, India image/svg+xml
  • PARVENDER SHEORAN ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana132 001, India image/svg+xml
  • GAJENDER YADAV ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana132 001, India image/svg+xml
  • NIRMAL SINGH ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana132 001, India image/svg+xml
  • SUBHASIS MANDAL ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana132 001, India image/svg+xml
  • R K YADAV ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana132 001, India image/svg+xml

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v95i3.162570

Keywords:

Financial analysis, GHG source and sink analysis, Integrated farming system, Salt-affected ecologies, Small and marginal farmers

Abstract

The horizontal expansion of the arable areas seems infeasible with dwindling natural resources and declining the average size of landholdings. For harnessing the economic, environmental and social benefits of vertical expansion, the Integrated Farming Systems (IFS) could be instrumental in sustaining the livelihood security of the resource-poor farmers dwelling in the degraded areas. An IFS model of 2 ha was designed covering three major components, namely, grain, horticultural crops and subsidiary at ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal and data from the year 2021–23 was considered for present study. A multi-dimensional analysis covering the financial (net present value, benefit: cost ratio and internal rate of return), soil health (total organic carbon and nitrogen) and environmental (carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas emission) parameters was carried out of an IFS model developed by ICAR- Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana. The findings showed that IFS generates more net return i.e., Rs 66596 than conventional rice-wheat system of equivalent scale (2.0 ha). Additionally, along with improved soil health, the IFS generated lesser (~13.25%) GHG emission as compared to the conventional rice-wheat system. To enhance carbon sequestration in the Integrated Farming System (IFS), more perennial trees should be planted in underutilized areas, especially along boundaries. This is vital for achieving net-zero emissions. Despite its financial viability and environmental benefits, the IFS has low adoption rates. Financial assessments show that economic incentives for initial investments are necessary to encourage wider adoption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allison L E and Moodie C D. 1965. Carbonate. Methods of soil analysis: Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, 9.2, pp. 1379–96. Norman A G (Ed). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.c40

Bano N, Yadav B and Kumari N. 2024. Livelihood security of small and marginal farm families, adopted conventional and integrated farming system: A comparative analysis. Journal of Community Mobilization and Sustainable Development 19: 187–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-6736.2024.00069.3

Behera U K and France J. 2016. Integrated farming systems and the livelihood security of small and marginal farmers in India and other developing countries. Advances in Agronomy 138: 235–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2016.04.001

Bernard B B, Bernard H and Brooks J M. 2004. Determination of total carbon, total organic carbon and inorganic carbon in sediments. TDIB rooks International/B&B Lab Inc., Texas.

Bhatt R, Kukal S S, Busari M A, Arora S and Yadav M. 2016. Sustainability issues on rice–wheat cropping system. International Soil and Water Conservation Research 4(1): 64–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2015.12.001

Bishwajit G. 2014. Promoting agricultural research and development to strengthen food security in South Asia. International Journal of Agronomy 2014: 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/589809

Bosma R H, Nhan D K, Udo H M and Kaymak U. 2012. Factors affecting farmers’ adoption of integrated rice-fish farming systems in the Mekong delta, Vietnam. Reviews in Aquaculture 4(3): 178–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-5131.2012.01069.x

Camargo G G T, Ryan M R and Richard T L. 2013. Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions from crop production using the farm energy analysis tool. BioScience 63(4): 263–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2013.63.4.6

Datta A, Basak N, Chaudhari S K and Sharma D K. 2015. Soil properties and organic carbon distribution under different land uses in reclaimed sodic soils of north-west India. Geoderma Regional 4: 134–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2015.01.006

Fagodiya R K, Pathak H, Bhatia A, Jain N and Gupta D K. 2020. Global warming potential and its cost of mitigation from maize (Zea mays)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 90(1): 69–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i1.98535

Fagodiya R K, Singh A, Singh R, Rani S, Kumar S, Rai A K, Sheoran P, Chandra P, Yadav R K, Sharma P C and Biswas A K. 2023. The food-energy-water-carbon nexus of the rice- wheat production system in the western Indo-Gangetic Plain of India: An impact of irrigation system, conservational tillage and residue management. Science of the Total Environment 860: 160428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160428

FAO. 2024. Integrated production systems and climate change, Food and Agriculture Organization. https://www.fao.org/ climate-smart-agriculture-sourcebook/production-resources/module-b5-integrated-production-systems/chapter-b5-1/en/

Gill M S, Singh J P and Gangwa K. 2009. Integrated farming system and agriculture sustainability. Indian Journal of Agronomy 54(2): 128–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v54i2.4790

GoI. 2019. All India Report on Number and Area of operational holdings, agriculture census division, Department of Agriculture, Co-Operation and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India.

GoI. 2024. Agricultural statistics at a glance 2023. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Economics, Statistics and Evaluation Division, Government of India.

Jose and Krishna V V. 2021. Whether Indian wheat? productivity plateau, spatial heterogeneity, and R&D targeting. Review of Agrarian Studies 11(1): 22–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25003/RAS.11.1.0003

Kumar S, Jha G K, Singh D R and Biswas H 2020. Economic incentives for sustainable legume production in India. Current Science 119(7): 1184–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v119/i7/1184-1189

Kumar S, Sharma D K, Singh D R, Biswas H, Praveen K V and Sharma V. 2019. Estimating loss of ecosystem services due to paddy straw burning in North-west India. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 17(2): 146–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2019.1581474

Kumar S, Singh M, Kumar S and Rajeev 2025. Changes in root nodules dynamics under mixed cropping with varying nutrient management of berseem crop and succeeding fodder cowpea. Journal of Plant Nutrition 48(4): 617–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2024.2410818

Ladha J K, Dawe D, Pathak H, Padre A T, Yadav R L, Singh B, Singh Y, Singh Y, Singh P, Kundu A L and Sakal R. 2003. How extensive are yield declines in long-term rice–wheat experiments in Asia? Field Crops Research 81: 159–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00219-8

Meena L R. 2022. Integrated farming system models development for small and marginal households for sustainable production and livelihood improvement in India: An overview. Medicon Agriculture and Environmental Sciences 3: 05–18.

Mughal M and Sers C F. 2020. Cereal production, undernourishment and food insecurity in South Asia. Review of Development Economics 24(2): 524–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12659

Mujahed B A, Singh J and Saqib A. 2023. Integrated farming system: Trends, advantages and constraints-A review. RASSA Journal of Science for Society 5(2–3): 65–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2583-3715.2023.00011.4

Ponnusamy K and Devi M K. 2017. Impact of integrated farming system approach on doubling farmers’ income. Agricultural Economics Research Review 30: 233–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2017.00037.4

Priya and Singh S P. 2024. Factors influencing the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices: a systematic literature review and lesson learned for India. Forum for Social Economics 53(1): 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2022.2057566

Raghavendra K J, John J, Jacob D, Rajendran T, Prusty A K, Ansari M A, Ravisankar N, Kumar S, Singh R, Shamim M, Punia P, Nirmal, Meena A L, Kashyap P, Shivaswamy G P and Dutta D. 2024. Unraveling determinants of integrated farming systems adoption for sustainable livelihood and dietary diversity. Frontiers in Nutrition 11: 1264658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1264658

Schumacher B A. 2002. Methods for the determination of total organic carbon (TOC) in soils and sediments. U S Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D C, USA.

Singh G, Jat H S, Kumar A, Sekhawat K, Yaduvanshi N P S, Tripathi R S, Batra L. Pandey, R S, Sharma P C, Chaudhari S K, Singh S K, Kundu S S, Sirohi N S, Mohan S, Singh D and Kailash 2009. Eco-friendly integrated multi-enterprise model for livelihood security in small farm holdings, pp. 28. Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal-Haryana, India.

Singh R, Singh A, Sheoran P, Fagodiya R K, Rai A K, Chandra P, Rani S, Yadav R K and Sharma P C. 2022. Energy efficiency and carbon footprints of rice-wheat system under long-term tillage and residue management practices in western Indo- Gangetic Plains in India. Energy 244: 122655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122655

Singh R D, Dey A and Singh A K. 2011. Vision-2030. pp. 26. ICAR Research Complex of Eastern Region, Patna.

Singh V K, Rathore S S, Singh R K, Upadhyay P K and Shekhawat K. 2020. Integrated farming system approach for enhanced farm productivity, climate resilience and doubling farmers’ income. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 90(8): 1378–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i8.105884

Subash N, Dutta D and Ravisankar N. 2018. IFS-GHG Estimation Tool Ver. 1.0. A greenhouse gases estimation tool for integrated farming system models; AICRP-IFS, ICAR-IIFSR: Modipuram, Meerut, India.

Walia S S and Kaur T. 2023. Sustainable Rural Livelihood Security Through IFS. Basics of Integrated Farming Systems, pp. 113– 55, Walia S S and Kaur T. (Eds). Springer Nature Singapore. Yadav G, Jat H S, Raju R, Yadav R K, Singh S K, Chaudhari S K and Sharma P C. 2022. Enterprise mix diversification: An option for ecologically sustainable food and nutritional security of small holders in Indo-Gangetic plains. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 20(1): 31–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2021.1912978

Submitted

2024-12-18

Published

2025-03-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

RAJKUMAR, KUMAR, S. ., FAGODIYA, R. K. ., SINGH, A. ., SHEORAN, P. ., YADAV, G. ., SINGH, N. ., MANDAL, S. ., & YADAV, R. K. . (2025). A multi-dimensional analysis of integrated farming system in salt-affected ecologies. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 95(3), 316–322. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v95i3.162570
Citation