Optimizing year-round fodder production for sustainable goat based integrated farming systems in the Yamuna ravines of Uttar Pradesh

MOHD  ARIF; R  POUROUCHOTTAMANE; ARVIND  KUMAR; RAVINDRA  KUMAR; B  RAI; CHETNA  GANGWAR; RAKESH  KUMAR; M K  SINGH; A K  DIXIT; K  GURURAJ

doi:10.56093/ijas.v95i3.162595

Authors

MOHD ARIF ICAR-Indian Institute of Farming Systems Research, Modipuram, Meerut, Uttar Prdaesh
R POUROUCHOTTAMANE North Temperate Regional Station, ICAR-Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Garsa, Himachal Pradesh
ARVIND KUMAR ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh 281 122, India
RAVINDRA KUMAR ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh 281 122, India
B RAI ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh 281 122, India
CHETNA GANGWAR Uttar Pradesh Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishwavidyalaya Evam Go-Anusandhan Sansthan, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh
RAKESH KUMAR Indian Council of Agriculture Research, New Delhi
M K SINGH ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh 281 122, India
A K DIXIT ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh 281 122, India
K GURURAJ ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh 281 122, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v95i3.162595

Keywords:

Cereal-legume intercropping, Fodder sustainability, Good agricultural practices (GAP), Land-use efficiency, Monetary advantage

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted during the kharif and rabi seasons of 2020 and 2021 at ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh to optimize year-round fodder production for 20 goats and their 30 followers using one acre of land through the development of intercropping concept with different cereals and leguminous fodder crops; along with the implementation of good agricultural practices (GAP) during rainy (kharif) and winter (rabi) seasons. The technique demonstrated the potential to yield 7,600 kg of green fodder and 760 kg of maize grain from approximately one acre area during the kharif season. This output was sufficient to meet the green fodder requirements of the herd for six months. Similarly, during the rabi season, the technique produced 19,545 kg of green fodder and 652 kg of barley grain from one acre area, providing a surplus of green fodder and replacing over 85% of the barley requirement in concentrate feed for the herd over six months. The study highlights that by integrating intercropping strategies and GAP, goat farmers can sustainably produce the required green fodder and concentrate grain for a herd of 20 goats and 30 followers for a full year on just one acre of land.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ayub M, Muhammad A N, Tanveer A and Husain A. 2002. Effect of different levels of nitrogen and harvesting time on the growth, yield and quality of sorghum fodder. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 1: 304–07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2002.304.307

Davies B, Coulter J A and Pagliari P H. 2020. Timing and rate of nitrogen fertilization influence maize yield and nitrogen use efficiency. PLOS One 15: e0233674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233674

Dhonde A S, Pilane M S and Mahatre A N. 2016. Effect of intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) + cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) on leaf stem ratio, maize equivalent yield and land equivalent ratio. Journal of Agroecology and Natural Resource Management 3(1): 27–29.

Dwivedi A, Dev I, Kumar V, Yadav R S, Yadav M, Gupta D, Singh A and Tomer S S. 2015. Potential role of maize-legume intercropping systems to improve soil fertility status under smallholder farming systems for sustainable agriculture in India. International Journal of Life Sciences Biotechnology and Pharma Research 4(3): 145–57.

Ganvit V C, Surve V H, Sharma S and Ganvit J B. 2018. Forage production potential of oat (Avena sativa)-lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) intercropping under sole and intercropping systems. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 7: 705–07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2394-4471.2018.00025.4

Ghosh P K, Tripathi A K, Bandyopadhyay K K and Manna M C. 2009. Assessment of nutrient competition and nutrient requirement in soybean/sorghum intercropping system. European Journal of Agronomy 31: 43–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2009.03.002

Gill A S and Verma B S. 1993. Intercropping enhances the yield of cereal and leguminous forage crop. Indian Farming 42: 25–27.

Ginwal D S, Kumar R, Ram H, Meena R K and Kumar U. 2019. Quality characteristics and nutrient yields of maize and legume forages under changing intercropping row ratios. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 89: 281–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i3.88079

Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, New York. Islam N, Zamir M S I, Din S M U, Farooq U, Arshad H, Bilal A and Sajjad M T. 2018. Evaluating the intercropping of millet with cowpea for forage yield and quality. American Journal of Plant Sciences 9(9): 1781–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2018.99130

Kharub A S, Verma R P S, Kumar D, Kumar V, Selvakumar R and Sharma I. 2013. Dual purpose barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in India: Performance and potential. Journal of Wheat Research 5: 55–58.

Khonde P, Tshiabukole K, Kankolongo M, Hauser S, Djamba M, Vumilia K and Nkongolo K. 2018. Evaluation of yield and competition indices for intercropped eight maize varieties, soybean and cowpea in the zone of Savanna of south-west RD Congo. Open Access Library Journal 5: e3746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1103746

Langat M C, Okiror M A, Ouma J P and Gesimba R M. 2006. The effect of intercropping groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) with sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) on yield and cash income. Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica 39: 87–91.

Mosisa W, Dechassa N, Kibret K, Zeleke H and Bekeko Z. 2022. Effects of timing and nitrogen fertilizer application rates on maize yield components and yield in eastern Ethiopia. Agrosystems, Geosciences and Environment 5: 20322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20322

Narwal S S and Sardana V. 2002. Effect of sowing dates and seed rates on the green forage, seed yield and quality of late sown berseem. Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities 25(2): 181–84.

Obuo J E, Adipopala E and Osiru D S O. 1998. Effect of spacing on yield of cowpea-sorghum intercrop. Tropical Science 38: 67–73. Pandita A K, Shah M H and Bali A S. 1998. Row ratio in maize (Zea mays)-legume intercropping in temperate valley conditions. The

Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 68: 633–35.

Ramanakumar K and Bhanumurthy V B. 2001. Effect of staggered sowing and relative proportion of cowpea on the performance of maize + cowpea. Forage Research 27: 105–10.

Roy A K, Agrawal R K, Bhardwaj N R, Mishra A K and Mahanta S K. 2019. Revisiting national forage demand and availability scenario. Indian Fodder Scenario: Redefining State Wise Status, pp. 1–2. Roy A K, Agrawal R K, Bhardwaj N R (Eds). ICAR-AICRP on Forage Crops and Utilization, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India,

Satpal, Sheoran R S, Tokas J and Jindal Y. 2020. Phosphorus influenced nutritive value, yield and economics of berseem (Trifolium alexandrinum L.) genotypes. Chemical Science Review and Letters 9(34): 365–73.

Sharma R P, Singh A K, Poddar B K and Raman K R. 2008. Forage production potential and economics of maize (Zea mays) with legumes intercropping under various row proportions. Indian Journal of Agronomy 52: 121–24.

Tamta A, Kumar R, Ram H, Meena R K, Meena V K, Yadav M R and Subrahmanya D J. 2019. Productivity and profitability of legume-cereal forages under different planting ratio and nitrogen fertilization. Legume Research 42: 102–07.

Tripathi R K, Pradhan L and Rath B S. 1997. Performance of maize (Zea mays) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) forage intercropping system in summer. Indian Journal of Agronomy 42: 38–41.

Tripathi S N. 1989. Mixed cropping of forage species in relation to herbage yield and quality. Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development 4(2): 68–72.

Venterea R T and Coulter J A. 2015. Split application of urea does not decrease and may increase nitrous oxide emissions in rainfed corn. Agronomy Journal 107: 337–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj14.0411

Wang X, Shi Y, Guo Z, Zhang Y and Yu Z. 2015. Water use and soil nitrate nitrogen changes under supplemental irrigation with nitrogen yield of maize (Zea mays L.). Pure and Applied Biology 6: 908–16.