Farming system typology construction for the adoption of new technologies in north-west India


301 / 229 / 70

Authors

  • KARTIK SHARMA 1ICAR-Indian Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Ranchi, Jharkhand image/svg+xml
  • SOHAN SINGH WALIA Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India image/svg+xml
  • JASHANJOT KAUR Regional Research Station, Kapurthala, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab
  • RAKSHIT BHAGAT Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
  • JAYANTA LAYEK ICAR-Indian Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Ranchi, Jharkhand image/svg+xml

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v95i3.162807

Keywords:

Cluster analysis, Farm clusters, Farming system, Farm typology, Principal component analysis

Abstract

The modern agricultural sector is facing significant challenges, viz. productivity, sustainability and profitability due to shrinking landholdings and limited resource base. Therefore, a study was carried in 2020 and 2021 at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, to investigate farm typologies in the north-west part of India using multivariate techniques [Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis (CA) (small diversified farms (Cluster I), larger crop-dominated farms (Cluster II), moderate-sized mixed farms (Cluster III), and large commercial farms (Cluster IV)] surveying 95 farm households in two districts (Tarn Taran and Patiala) of Punjab. By examining socio-economic factors and enterprise contributions, it identifies farm diversity to enhance technology adoption, improve incomes and recommend targeted policy interventions to the farmers. Using multivariate statistical techniques, structural and functional farm characteristics were analysed to construct specific farm typologies. The sequential application of PCA and CA revealed that the surveyed farmers had an average landholding of 17 acres, with a pre-dominant focus on cereal cultivation (cropping intensity: 163.7%) and crop income accounted for 94.1% of total earnings, with dairy and other agricultural allied enterprises contributing minimally. The PCA identified three principal components that explained 51.5% of the variance, emphasizing cropping intensity, income distribution, and livestock dynamics. Cluster analysis grouped households into four typologies i.e. (small diversified farms (Cluster I), larger crop-dominated farms (Cluster II), moderate-sized mixed farms (Cluster III), and large commercial farms (Cluster IV)] surveying 95 farm households in two districts (Tarn Taran and Patiala) of Punjab, each cluster exhibited variations in landholding size, labour utilization, crop-livestock integration, and income composition. Cluster-specific recommendations include technical support, diversification strategies and market-oriented interventions to enhance productivity and sustainability. This typology-based classification integrates socioeconomic and resource characteristics, offering a sustainable framework for targeted agricultural policies and interventions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Behera U K and France J. 2023. Farming systems research: Concepts, design and methodology. Advances in Agronomy 177: 1–49.

Bhagat R, Walia S S, Sharma K, Singh R, Singh G and Hossain A. 2024. The integrated farming system is an environmentally friendly and cost-effective approach to the sustainability of agri-food systems in the modern era of the changing climate: A comprehensive review. Food and Energy Security 13: e534.

Folmer H, Dutta S and Oud H. 2010. Determinants of rural industrial entrepreneurship of farmers in West Bengal: A structural equations approach. International Regional Science Review 33: 367–96.

Goswami R, Chatterjee S and Prasad B. 2014. Farm types and their economic characterization in complex agro-ecosystems for informed extension intervention: study from coastal West Bengal, India. Agricultural and Food Economics 2: 1–24.

Innazent A, Jacob D, Bindhu J S, Joseph B, Anith K N, Ravisankar N, Prusty, A K, Paramesh V and Panwar A S. 2022. Farm typology of smallholders integrated farming systems in Southern Coastal Plains of Kerala, India. Scientific Reports 12: 333.

Kaur J, Prusty A K, Ravisankar N, Panwar A S, Shamim M, Walia S S, Chatterjee S, Pasha M L, Babu S, Jat M L and López- Ridaura S. 2021. Farm typology for planning targeted farming systems interventions for smallholders in Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Scientific reports 11: 20978.

Nabi R. 2008. Constraints to the adoption of rice-fish farming by smallholders in Bangladesh: A farming systems analysis. Aquaculture Economics and Management 12: 145–53.

Paramesh V, Ravisankar N, Behera U, Arunachalam V, Kumar P, Solomon Rajkumar R, Dhar Misra S, Mohan Kumar R, Prusty A K, Jacob D and Panwar A S. 2022. Integrated farming system approaches to achieve food and nutritional security for enhancing profitability, employment, and climate resilience in India. Food and Energy Security 11: e321.

Rousseeuw P J. 1987. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 20: 53–65.

Sarker M R, Galdos M V, Challinor A J and Hossain A. 2021. A farming system typology for the adoption of new technology in Bangladesh. Food and Energy Security 10: e287.

Ward J J H. 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of American Statistical Association 58: 236–44.

Submitted

2024-12-25

Published

2025-03-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SHARMA, K. ., WALIA, S. S. ., KAUR, J. ., BHAGAT, R. ., & LAYEK, J. . (2025). Farming system typology construction for the adoption of new technologies in north-west India. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 95(3), 355–360. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v95i3.162807
Citation