Enhancing farm productivity, sustainability, and resilience through farmer participatory integrated farming systems in the arid regions of western Rajasthan


277 / 227 / 83

Authors

  • N K JAT ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur, Rajasthan 342 003, India image/svg+xml
  • P R MEGHWAL ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur, Rajasthan 342 003, India image/svg+xml
  • DIPIKA HAJONG ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur, Rajasthan 342 003, India image/svg+xml
  • PARMENDER ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur, Rajasthan 342 003, India image/svg+xml
  • VIJAY AVINASHILINGAM N A ICAR-National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad, Telangana image/svg+xml

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v95i3.162849

Keywords:

Arid agriculture, Participatory research, Pearl millet equivalent yield, Resource recycling, Sustainability livelihood index

Abstract

A study was carried out during 2021 and 2023 at four villages in Jodhpur, Rajasthan under the ICAR-Farmer FIRST project to assess the productivity, resilience, and sustainability of Integrated Farming Systems (IFS) under rainfed and irrigated conditions in the arid region of western Rajasthan. The study evaluated 15 IFS models (seven rainfed, eight irrigated), of 2.0 ha each. The findings revealed the greater performance of irrigated IFS, which achieved a mean pearl millet (Paspalum scrobiculatum L.) equivalent yield (PEY) of 20,662 kg compared to 7,049 kg in rainfed systems. Enhanced productivity in irrigated IFS was attributed to the inclusion of high-value cash crops such as cumin and onion, alongside innovative components like azolla cultivation and vermicomposting. Economic analysis demonstrated a higher benefit-cost (B:C) ratio for irrigated IFS (3.10) compared to rainfed IFS (2.13), highlighting the economic advantages of resource integration and diversification. Irrigated IFS also exhibited enhanced resource recycling, with significant contributions from crop stover, farmyard manure, and mushroom spent residue. Employment generation was notably higher in IFS systems, providing 271 man-days annually compared to 160 in rainfed IFS systems. Although IFS systems exhibited resilience through resource conservation and stable livestock contributions, their productivity remained constrained by climatic variability. The study highlights the transformative potential of participatory IFS models in optimizing resource use, enhancing farm sustainability and improving livelihoods in resource-scarce arid regions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Din M S U, Ahmad I, Hussain N, Ahmad A, Wajid A, Khaliq T, Mubeen M, Imran M, Ali A, Akram R, Amanet K, Saleem M and Nasim W. 2019. Agronomic cropping systems in relation to climatic variability. Agronomic Crops, pp .67–82. Hasanuzzaman M (Ed). Springer, Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9151-5_5

Jat N K, Patel N K, Ola A K, Kachhawaha C M and Rohilla P P. 2024. Low-cost interventions for improving livestock productivity in arid regions. Intensive Agriculture 58(1): 25–30.

Kar A. 2014. Agricultural land use in arid Western Rajasthan: Resource exploitation and emerging issues. Agropedology 24(2): 179–96.

Kingra P K and Kaur H. 2017. Microclimatic modifications to manage extreme weather vulnerability and climatic risks in crop production. Journal of Agricultural Physics 17(1): 1–15.

Kumar R, Gurjar L R, Meena R L, Sharma S C, Dangi S, Sahu B S, Mandeewal R L, Kumar A and Chahal V P. 2021. Participatory agricultural development for livelihood security and economic empowerment of farmers in semi-arid region of Rajasthan. Indian Farming 71(10): 58–59.

Kumar S, Dey A, Kumar U, Kumar R, Mondal S and Kumar A. 2022. Location-specific integrated farming system models for resource recycling and livelihood security for smallholders Frontiers in Agronomy 4: 938331. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fagro.2022.938331 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2022.938331

Meena L R, Kochewad S A, Prusty A K, Bhanu C, Kumar S, Meena A L, Meena L K, Raghavendra K J, Kumar D, Subash N and Singh S P. 2022. Sustainable integrated farming system model for small farm holders of Uttar Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 92(9): 1080–85. https://doi.org/10.56093/ ijas.v92i8.110742 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v92i9.110742

Nayak P K, Nayak A K, Panda B B, Senapati A, Panneerselvam P, Kumar A, Tripathi R, Poonam A, Shahid M, Mohapatra S D, Kaviraj M and Kumar U. 2024. Rice-based integrated farming system improves the soil quality, bacterial community structure and system productivity under sub-humid tropical condition. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 46(2): 65. doi: 10.1007/s10653-024-01863-1. PMID: 38321197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-024-01863-1

Panwar A S and Ravisankar N. 2022. Integrated farming systems for doubling farmers’ income. Secondary Agriculture, pp. 67–82.

Bahar F A, Anwar Bhat M and Mahdi S S (Eds),. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09218-3_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09218-3_4

Patel A M, Patel K M and Patel P K. 2019. Sustainability of farm and farmers through integrated farming system approach. Indian Journal of Agronomy 64(3): 320–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v64i3.5277

Poonia S, Jat N K and Ola C M. 2023. Animal feed solar cooker: Design and economics. Indian Farming 73(08): 23–25.

Rao C S, Gopinath K A, Prasad Y G, Sikka A K and Singh R. 2016. Climate resilient rainfed agriculture: Status and strategies. Indian Farming 66(2): 2–6.

Rathore V S, Tanwar S P S, Kumar P and Yadav O P. 2019. Integrated farming system: Key to sustainability in arid and semi-arid regions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 89(2): 181–92. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i2.86982 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i2.86982

Sharma P. 2017. Participatory approaches in farming: Enhancing farmer engagement and knowledge transfer in rural areas in Rajasthan. International Journal of Novel Research and Development 2(10): 72–79.

Shyam C S, Shekhawat K, Rathore S S, Babu S, Singh R K, Upadhyay P K, Dass A, Fatima A, Kumar S, Sanketh G D and Singh V K. 2023. Development of integrated farming system model: A step towards achieving biodiverse, resilient and productive green economy in agriculture for small holdings in India. Agronomy 13: 955. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13040955 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13040955

Singh V K, Rathore S S, Singh R K, Upadhyay P K and Shekhawat K. 2020. Integrated farming system approach for enhanced farm productivity, climate resilience and doubling farmers’ income. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 90(8): 1378–88. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i8.105884 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i8.105884

Walia S S, Dhawan V, Dhawan A K and Ravisankar N. 2019. Integrated farming system: Enhancing income source for marginal and small farmers. Natural Resource Management: Ecological Perspectives 63–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99768-1_5

Submitted

2024-12-26

Published

2025-03-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

JAT, N. K. ., MEGHWAL, P. R. ., HAJONG, D. ., PARMENDER, & N A, V. A. . (2025). Enhancing farm productivity, sustainability, and resilience through farmer participatory integrated farming systems in the arid regions of western Rajasthan. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 95(3), 280–285. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v95i3.162849
Citation