Assessment of the phenology, silage yield and quality of spring maize (Zea mays)in different crop rotations

NAVJOT SINGH  BRAR; SIMERJEET  KAUR; P K  KINGRA; JASPAL SINGH  HUNDAL

doi:10.56093/ijas.v95i12.163821

Authors

NAVJOT SINGH BRAR Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tarn Taran, Punjab; 2Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab
SIMERJEET KAUR Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
P K KINGRA Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004, India
JASPAL SINGH HUNDAL Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v95i12.163821

Keywords:

Heat stress, Maize-based crop rotations, Phenology, Rice-based crop rotations, Sowing time, Silage

Abstract

In north-western India, maize (Zea mays L.) is mainly grown in spring season for silage making. Sowing time of spring maize in different rice (Oryza sativa L.) and maize-based crop rotations varies, and it affects the yield and quality of silage. The present experiment was conducted during 2020–21 and 2021–22 at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab with four crop rotations i.e. maize–toria (Brassica rapa ssp. oleifera)-spring maize (silage); rice (Oryza sativa L.)–barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) (silage)–spring maize (silage); rice–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (silage)–spring maize (silage) and maize–rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)–spring maize (silage) to evaluate the spring maize silage yield and quality in randomised complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Sowing of spring maize was undertaken from 8^th February to 19^th March in different crop rotations and harvested at milk stage for silage making. Spring maize grown in maize–toria–spring maize took greater number of days for reaching all phenological stages. During 2021, heat use efficiency (HUE) was higher in maize–toria–spring maize, was similar with rice–barley–spring maize and rice–wheat–spring maize. However, during 2022, maize–toria–spring maize recorded higher HUE and better silage quality than all other treatments. Higher silage yield of spring maize was recorded in maize–toria–spring maize, was similar to rice–barley–spring maize but higher than rice–wheat–spring maize and maize–rapeseed–spring maize rotations during both years. The delayed sowing altered the phenological development of maize, resulted in reduced silage yield and quality. Further, heat wave in northern India during March 2022 resulted in 24–28% reduction in silage yield in four crop rotations during 2022 than 2021. Results indicated that maize–toria–spring maize and rice–barley–spring maize rotations are most suitable for achieving high-quality spring maize silage production.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AOAC. 2007. Official Methods of Analysis, 18th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaitherburg, Arlington.

Barker S B and Summerson W H. 1941. The colorimetric determination of lactic acid in biological material. Journal of Biological Chemistry 138: 535–54.

Borreani G, Tabacco E, Schmidt R J, Holmes B J and Muck R E. 2018. Silage review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages. Journal of Dairy Science 101(5): 3952–79.

Brar N S, Kaur S, Hundal J S, Kaur M, Bhadauria P, Sheoran P and Singh R. 2023. Silage Making: An Emerging Enterprise for Dairy Sector, pp. 112. ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Zone-1, Ludhiana, Punjab, India. https://atariz1.icar.gov.in/pdf/Silage%20Making.pdf Brar N S, Kaur S, Sandhu P S, Hundal J S and Singh Y. 2024.

Agronomic interventions for production and preservation of quality maize fodder. Maydica 67(1): 1–16.

Brar N S, Kumar B, Hundal J S, Singla A, Kumar A and Verma H K. 2021. Maize (Zea mays) cultivars evaluation for herbage yield and silage quality. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 91(8): 1131–35.

Brar N S, Kumar B, Kaur J, Kumar A, Verma H K, Singh R and Singh P. 2019. Qualitative study of corn silage of cattle farms in subtropical conditions of Indo-Gangetic plains. Range Management and Agroforestry 40(2): 306–12.

Chahine M, Fife T E and Shewmaker G E. 2009. Target values for corn silage. (In) Idaho Alfalfa and Forage Conference Proceedings, Idaho, 04 February 2009, pp. 1–5.

Darby H M and Lauer J G. 2002. Harvest date and hybrid influence on corn forage yield, quality and preservation. Agronomy Journal 94: 559–66.

El-Sappah A H, Rather S A, Wani S H, Elrys A S, Bilal M, Huang Q, Dar Z A, Elashtokhy M M A, Soaud N, Koul M, Mir R R, Yan K, Li J, El-Tarabily K A and Abbas M. 2022. Heat stress-mediated constraints in maize (Zea mays) production: Challenges and solutions. Frontiers in Plant Science 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.879366

Ge J, Xu Y, Zhao M, Zhan M, Cao C, Chen C and Zhou B. 2022. Effect of climatic conditions caused by seasons on maize yield, kernel filling and weight in central China. Agronomy 12(8): 1816. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081816

Harrison L, Michaelsen J, Funk C and Husak G. 2011. Effects of temperature changes on maize production in Mozambique. Climate Research 46: 211–22.

Huang Y, Liang L, Dai S, Wu C, Chen C and Hao J. 2021. Effect of different regions and ensiling periods on fermentation quality and bacterial community of whole-plant maize silage. Frontiers in Microbiology 12: 743695.

Jia T and Yu Z. 2022. Effect of temperature and fermentation time on fermentation characteristics and biogenic amine formation of oat silage. Fermentation 8: 352.

Li T, Zhang, Peng X, Liu Q, Liu J, Chen Y Quan and Sui P. 2022. Yield penalty of maize (Zea mays L.) under heat stress in different growth stages: A review. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 21(9): 2465–76.

Mahmood S, Wahid A, Javed F and Basra S M A. 2010. Heat stress effects on forage quality characteristics of maize (Zea mays) cultivars. International Journal of Agricultural Biology 12: 701–06.

Mayer L I, Edreira J I R and Maddonni G A. 2014. Oil yield components of maize crops exposed to heat stress during early and late grain-filling stages. Crop Science 54: 2236−50. Muchow R C and Bellamy J A. 1991. Climatic Risk in Crop Production: Models and Management for the Semiarid Tropics and Subtropics. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. https://oar.icrisat.org/4625/1/CP_581.pdf

Nuttonson M Y. 1955. Wheat Climate Relationships and Use of Phenology in Ascertaining the Thermal and Photothermal Requirement of Wheat, pp. 338. American Institute of Crop Ecology, Washington DC.

Robertson J B and Van Soest P J. 1981. The detergent system of analysis and its applications to human foods. (In) The Analysis of Dietary Fiber in Food, pp. 123–58. James W P T and Theander O M D (Eds). Inc. New York.

Roth G W and Heinrichs A J. 2001. Corn silage production and management. (In) Agronomy Facts-18, The Pennsylvania State University.

Schauberger B, Archontoulis S, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Elliott J, Folberth C, Khabarov N and Muller C. 2017. Consistent negative response of US crops to high temperatures in observations and crop models. Nature Communications 8: 13931.

Singh R, Kaur S, Murai A S, Brar N S, Brar P S, Kumar A and Singh A K. 2022. Heat Wave in Northern India: Farmers’ Perspective, pp.76. Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR, New Delhi.

Tao Z Q, Sui P, Chen Y Q, Li C, Nie Z J, Yuan S F, Shi J T and Gao W S. 2013. Subsoiling and ridge tillage alleviate the high temperature stress in spring maize in the North China Plain. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 12: 2179−88.

Wang N, Liu Q, Ming B, Shang W, Zhao X, Wang X, Wang J, Zhang J, Luo Z and Liao Y. 2022. Impacts of heat stress around flowering on growth and development dynamic of maize (Zea mays L.) ear and yield formation. Plants 11(24): 3515. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243515

Zhi-qiang T, Yuan-quan C, Chao L, Juan-xiu Z, Peng Y, Shu-fen Y, Xia W and Peng S. 2016. The causes and impacts for heat stress in spring maize during grain filling in the North China Plain-A review. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 15(12): 2677–87.