Identification of stable and high yielding early rice (Oryza sativa) lines across seasons using GGE Biplot analysis


52

Authors

  • Sreedhar Siddi Agricultural Research Institute, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030, India
  • D Anil Agricultural College, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University, Dichpally, Nizamabad, Telangana 503 175, India
  • R Abdul Fiyaz ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500 030, India image/svg+xml

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v96i4.164644

Keywords:

GGE Biplot, Grain yield, Polygon, Rice, Stability analysis

Abstract

 

The present study was conducted across four seasonal environments, Summer 2018–19, Rainy 2019, Summer 2019–20, and Rainy 2020 to evaluate grain yield performance, stability, and adaptability of nine early-maturing rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. The comprehensive analysis of variance unequivocally revealed statistically significant influences from lines, seasons, and their interaction, indicating a complex interplay that governs grain yield variability. The findings of GGE biplot methodology demonstrated that greatest variation of total variation was concentrated in environmental factors, subsequently in line impacts and their interactions influencing grain yield. More than 85% of the total variation was captured by the first two principal components, with PC1 and PC2 explaining 68.8% and 18.3% of the variation, respectively. In the GGE biplot genotype view, genotypes G1 and G5 were identified as high-yielding and stable, as indicated by their proximity to the biplot origin suggesting broad adaptability and minimal G × E interaction. The GGE biplot facilitated the identification of mega-environments through polygon, wherein the top-performing lines included G3, G5 and G1 in Mega Environment 1, while G7 stood out as the elite line in Mega Environment 2. G3 was closely aligned with the ideal line followed by G5 and G1, in biplot’s average-environment coordination (AEC) view, conclusively expressing remarkable yield and stability due to their extensive adaptability under the seasons tested suggests strong potential for inclusion in early rice varietal development and multi-environment breeding programs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aktar A, Hasan MJ, Kulsumu, Rahman MH, Khatun M and Islam MR. 2015. GGE biplot analysis for yield stability in multi-environment trials of promising hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.). Bangladesh Rice Journal 19(1): 1-8. doi.org/10.3329/brj. v19i1.25213.

Atlin GN, McRae KB and Lu X. 2000. Genotype x Region interaction for two-row barley yield in Canada. Crop Science 40: 1-6. doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.4011.

Balakrishnan D, Malathi S, Venkateswara Rao Y, Krishnam Raju A, Sukumar M, Kavitha B and Sarla N. 2020. Detecting CSSLs and yield QTLs with additive, epistatic and QTL×environment interaction effects from Oryza sativa × O. nivara IRGC81832 cross. Scientific Reports 10: 7766. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64300-0.

Bose LK, Jambhulkar NN, Pande K and Singh ON. 2014. Use of AMMI and other stability statistics in the simultaneous selection of rice genotypes for yield and stability under direct-seeded conditions. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 74 (1): 3-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392014000100001.

Bueno CS and Lafarge T. 2017. Maturity groups and growing seasons as key sources of variation to consider within breeding programmes for high yielding rice in the tropics. Euphytica 213: 74. doi.org/10.1007/s10681-017-1862-z.

De Los Reyes BG, Morsy MJ, Gibbons, Varma TSN, Antoine W and Mc Grath JM. 2003. A snapshot of the low temperatures stress transcriptome of developing rice seedling (Oryza sativa L.) via ESTs from subtracted cDNA library. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107 (6): 1071-82. doi: 10.1007/s00122-003-1344-7.

Gauch HG and Zobel RW. 1996. AMMI analysis of yield trials. Genotype-by-Environment Interaction, pp.85-122. Kang MS and Gauch HG (Eds.). CRC Press, Boca Raton. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420049374.ch4.

Gauch HG. 2006. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Science 46: 1488-1500.

Huang M, Qi-Yuan T, He-Jum A and Ying-Bin Z. 2017. Yield potential and stability in super hybrid rice and its production strategies. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 16(5): 1009-17. doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61535-6.

Jain BT, Sarial AK and Kaushik P. 2019. Understanding G x E interaction of elite basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes under north Indian condition using stability models. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 17(3): 5863-85. doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1703_58635885

Kang MS. 1993. Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in crop performance trials: Consequences for growers. Agronomy Journal 85 (3): 754-57. doi: 10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500030042x.

Kesh H, Kharb R, Ram K, Munjal R, Kaushik P and Kumar D. 2021. Adaptability and AMMI biplot analysis for yield and agronomical traits in scented rice genotypes under diverse production environments. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 20(2): 550-62.

Krishnamurthy SL, Sharma PC, Sharma DK, Singh YP, Mishra VK, Burman D, Maji B, Mandal S, Sarangi SK, Gautam RK, Singh PK, Manohara KK, Marandi BC, Chattopadhyay K, Padmavathi G, Vanve PB, Patil KD, Thirumeni S, Verma OP, Khan, AH, Tiwari S, Geetha S, Gill R, Yadav VK, Roy B, Prakash M, Anandan A, Bonifacio J, Ismail AM and Singh RK. 2021. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analyses of yield performance in rice genotypes for general and specific adaptation to salt stress in locations in India. Euphytica 217: 20. doi.org/10.1007/s10681-020-02730-7.

Kumar BMD, Purushottam AP, Raghavendra P, Vittal T, Shubha KN and Madhuri R. 2020. Genotype Environment Interaction and Stability for Yield and Its Components in Advanced Breeding Lines of Red Rice (Oryza Sativa L.) Bangladesh Journal of Botany 49(3): 425-35.

Parihar AK, Basandrai AK, Sirari A, Dinakaran D, Singh D, Kannan K, Kushawaha PS, Adinarayan M, Akram M, Latha TKS, Paranidharan V and Gupta S. 2017. Assessment of mungbean genotypes for durable resistance to Yellow Mosaic Disease: Genotype x Environment interaction. Plant Breeding 136 (1): 94-100. doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12446.

Poli Y, Balakrishnan D, Desiraju S, Panigrahy M, Voleti SR, Mangrauthia SK and Neelamraju S. 2018. Genotype × Environment interactions of Nagina22 rice mutants for yield traits under low phosphorus, water limited and normal irrigated conditions. Scientific Reports. 8(1): 15530. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33812-1.

Ponnuswamy R, Rathore A, Vemula A, Das RR, Singh AK and Balakrishnan D. 2018. Analysis of multi-location data of hybrids rice trials reveals complex genotype by environment interaction. Cereal Research Communications 46(1):146-57. doi.org/10.1556/0806.45.2017.065.

Sato Y, Masuta Y, Saito K, Murayama S and Ozawa K. 2011. Enhanced chilling tolerance at the booting stage in rice by transgenic overexpression of the ascorbate peroxidase gene, OsAPXa. Plant Cell Reports 30 (3): 399-6. doi.org/10.1007/s00299-010-0985-7.

Senguttuvel P, Sravanraju N, Jaldhani V, Divya B, Beulah P, Nagaraju P, Manasa Y, Prasad ASH, Brajendra P, Gireesh C, Anantha MS, Suneetha K, Sundaram RM, Madhav MS, Tuti MD, Subbarao LV, Neeraja CN, Bhadana VP, Rao PR, Voleti SR and Subrahmanyam D. 2021. Evaluation of genotype by environment interaction and adaptability in lowland irrigated rice hybrids for grain yield under high temperature. Scientific Reports 11(1): 15825. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95264-4.

Sharifi P, Aminpanah H, Erfani R, Mohaddesi A and Abbasian A. 2017. Evaluation of Genotype × Environment Interaction in Rice Based on AMMI Model in Iran. Rice Science 24(3): 173-80. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2017.02.001.

Suman K, Neeraja CN, Madhubabu P, Rathod S, Bej S, Jadhav KP, Kumar JA, Chaitanya U, Pawar SC, Rani SH, Subbarao, LV and Voleti SR. 2021. Identification of Promising RILs for High Grain Zinc Through Genotype × Environment Analysis and Stable Grain Zinc QTL Using SSRs and SNPs in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Frontiers in Plant Science 12: 587482. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.587482. PMID: 33679823; PMCID: PMC7930840.

Yan W, Hunt LA, Sheng Q and Szlavnics Z. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop science 40 (3): 597-5. doi :10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x.

Yan W, Cornelius PL, Crossa J and Hunt LA. 2001. Two types of GGE biplots for analyzing multi-environment trial data. Crop Science 41: 656-663.doi:10.2135/CROPSCI2001.413656X.

Yan W and Kang MS. 2003. GGE biplot analysis: a graphical tool for breeders, geneticists and agronomists, pp. 1-267. Yan W and Kang MS (Eds), CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Florida. ISBN: 0-8493-1338-4. doi: 10.1201/9781420040371.

Yan W and Tinker NA. 2006. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: Principles and applications. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 86: 623-645. doi.org/10.4141/P05-169.

Submitted

2025-02-10

Published

2026-04-10

How to Cite

Siddi, S., Anil, D. . ., & Fiyaz, R. A. . (2026). Identification of stable and high yielding early rice (Oryza sativa) lines across seasons using GGE Biplot analysis. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 96(4). https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v96i4.164644
Citation