Genetic relationship among papaya (Carica papaya) and wild papaya (Vasconcellea species) using RAPD and ISSR markers


142 / 51

Authors

  • KANUPRIYA KANUPRIYA Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hessarghatta , Bangalore, Karnataka 560 089
  • M SHOBHANA Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hessarghatta , Bangalore, Karnataka 560 089
  • C VASUGI Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hessarghatta , Bangalore, Karnataka 560 089
  • C ASWATH Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hessarghatta , Bangalore, Karnataka 560 089
  • V RADHIKA Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hessarghatta , Bangalore, Karnataka 560 089
  • LAXMAN REDDY Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hessarghatta , Bangalore, Karnataka 560 089
  • M R DINESH Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hessarghatta , Bangalore, Karnataka 560 089

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i4.16658

Keywords:

Cluster analysis, Genetic diversity, ISSR, RAPD

Abstract

Two different molecular methods namely, Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and Inter Simple Sequence Repeats (ISSR) were used to measure genetic diversity among thirteen commercially important cultivars of papaya and two species of useful wild papaya. Eleven ISSR and 16 RAPD primers were screened to amplify a total of 75 and 118 bands respectively. Of these, approximately 35% and 37.2% of the bands were polymorphic in each. Genetic similarity was computed and results displayed graphically as dendrogram generated by UPGMA cluster analysis showing the relationships among wild and cultivated papaya cultivars. Both methods revealed different groupings of the eleven cultivars of papaya. On the basis of correlation of data with morphological grouping based on fruit pulp colour and plant height, ISSR was judged to be best method for analyzing all papaya germplasm.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aradhya M K, Manshardt R M, Zee F, Morden C W. 1999. A phylogenetic analysis of the genus Carica L. (Caricaceae) based on restriction fragment length variation in a cpDNA intergeneric spacer region. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 46: 579– 86.

Badillo V.2000. Carica L.vs. Vasconcella St. Hil. (Caricaceae) con la rehabilitacio´n de este u´ltimo. Ernstia 10: 74–9.

Doyle J J and Doyle J L.1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12: 13–5.

Drew R, Siar S V, Dillon S, Ramage C, O’Brien C, Sajise A G C. 2007. Intergeneric hybridization between C. papaya and wild Vasconcellea species and identification of PRSV-P resistance gene. Acta Horticulturae 738: 165–9.

Kim M S, Moore P H, Zee F, Fitch M M M, Steiger D L, Manshardt R M. 2002. Genetic diversity of Carica papaya as revealed by AFLP markers. Genome 45: 503–12

Kumar B (Chief Ed.). National Horticulture Database. 2009. Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, 85 Institutional Area, Gurgaon

Kyndt T, Gheysen G. 2005. Evolutionary relationships between and within highland papayas (Vasconcellea) and the common papaya (C.papaya). Acta Horticulturae 740: 61–72.

Manshardt R M. 1992. Biotechnology of Perennial Fruit Crops, pp 489–511. CAB International, Wellingford, Oxon, UK.

NTSYS-pc 2.11 Exerter, SA,Tauket, NY USA: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis software package with UPGMA and dendrogram.

Van Droogenbroeck B, Breyne P, Goetghebeur P, Romeijn- Peeters E, Kyndt T, Heysen G. 2002. AFLP analysis of genetic relationships among papaya and its wild relatives (Caricaceae) from Ecuador. Theoritical and Applied Genetics 195: 289–97.

Yap I V, Nelson R J. 1996. WINBOOT: a program for performing bootstrap analysis of binary data to determine the confidence limits of UPGMA-based dendrograms. IRRI Discussion Paper Series NO. 14. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines.

Downloads

Submitted

2012-04-10

Published

2012-04-10

Issue

Section

Short-Communication

How to Cite

KANUPRIYA, K., SHOBHANA, M., VASUGI, C., ASWATH, C., RADHIKA, V., REDDY, L., & DINESH, M. R. (2012). Genetic relationship among papaya (Carica papaya) and wild papaya (Vasconcellea species) using RAPD and ISSR markers. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 82(4), 366–9. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i4.16658
Citation