Comparative assessment of integrated phosphorus management practices on growth attributes, productivity and nutrient utilisation underpigeon pea (Cajanus cajan)–wheat (Tritium aestivum) system

ASIK  DUTTA; KALI KRISHNA  HAZRA; CHAITANYA P  NATH; NARENDRA  KUMAR; RAGHAVENDRA  SINGH; C S  PRAHARAJ; ABHIK  PATRA

doi:10.56093/ijas.v95i8.166750

Authors

ASIK DUTTA ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh
KALI KRISHNA HAZRA ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh
CHAITANYA P NATH ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh
NARENDRA KUMAR ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh
RAGHAVENDRA SINGH ICAR-Indian Institute of Farming System Research, Modipuram, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh
C S PRAHARAJ ICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research, Junagadh, Gujarat
ABHIK PATRA Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Narkatiaganj, West Champaran, Bihar

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v95i8.166750

Keywords:

Integrated phosphorus management, Nutrient harvest index, Pigeon pea-wheat, Poultry manure, Uptake

Abstract

The present experiment was conducted during 2019–2022 at ICAR–Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh for assessing integrated phosphorus management strategies on growth attributes, yield and nutrient utilisation in pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]-wheat (Tritium aestivum L.) system. The experiment was laid out in a randomised block design (RBD) with four replication having treatments T1, Pi No-RDP (recommended dose of phosphorus) –WNo-RDP (only N and K); T2, Pi 100% RDP –W100% RDP; T3, Pi 60% of RDP + FYM (5 t/ha)- W60% of RDP; T4, Pi60% of RDP + PM (1 t/ha) -W60% of RDP; T5, Pi 60% of RDP + CR (50%) –W60% of RDP; T6, Pi60% of RDP + CR (50%) + PSB–W60% of RDP. Findings showed, nitrate reductase, chlorophyll-A and RGR impacted positively by integrated P-management practices in both the crops. Respective gain in yield under pigeon pea and wheat was 18% and 5% under T₄ than T₁ and on par with T₂. Progressive release of nutrients along with improvement in soil physio-chemical condition have resulted higher P-uptake in T₄ (26% and 11% in pigeon pea and wheat, respectively) than T₁. Physiological efficiency impacted significantly under nutrient management strategies and showed much variability in wheat due to residual fertiliser impact and leaf fall of previous pigeon pea crop specifically in T₁. In nutshell, application of 60% RDP in association with 1 t/ha poultry manure have proved a suitable alternative against conventional practice in pigeon pea-wheat system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahamad A, Kumar N and Yadav D. 2018. Integrated nutrient management in pigeon pea-based intercropping systems. Indian Journal of Agronomy 63(1): 39–44.

Amanullah M M, Somasundaram E, Vaiyapuri K and Sathyamoorthi K. 2007. Poultry manure to crops-A review. Agricultural Reviews 28(3): 216–22.

Ansari R A and Mahmood I. 2017. Optimization of organic and bio-organic fertilizers on soil properties and growth of pigeon pea. Scientia Horticulturae 226: 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.07.033

Arnon D I. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology 24(1): 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1

Babu S, Rana D S, Prasad D and Pal S. 2013. Effect of sunflower stover and nutrients management on productivity, nutrient economy and phosphorus use efficiencies of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan)-sunflower (Helianthus annuus) cropping system. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 83(2): 203–09.

Banerjee P, Venugopalan V K, Nath R, Gaber A and Hossain A. 2024. Dynamics of growth, physiology, radiation interception, production, and quality of autumn black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] as influenced by nutrient scheduling. Plos One 19(9): e0304466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304466

Briggs G E, Kidd F and West C. 1920. A quantitative analysis of plant growth: PART II. Annals of Applied Biology 7(2–3): 202–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1920.tb05308.x

Cazetta J O and Villela L C V. 2004. Nitrate reductase activity in leaves and stems of tanner grass (Brachiaria radicans Napper). Scientia Agricola 61: 640–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162004000600012

Dodd I C. 2003. Hormonal interactions and stomatal responses. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 22: 32–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-003-0023-x

Gangaiah B, Ahlawat I P S, Shivakumar B G and Babu M B B. 2013. Impact of organic mode of production on performance of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.) during conversion from conventional to organic production. Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development 28(2): 27–31.

Ghosh P K, Mohanty M, Bandyopadhyay K K, Painuli D K and Misra A K. 2006. Growth, competition, yields advantage and economics in soybean/pigeon pea intercropping system in semi-arid tropics of India: II. Effect of nutrient management. Field Crops Research 96(1): 90–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.05.010

Gorooei A, Gaiser T, Aynehband A, Rahnama A and Kamali B. 2023. The effect of farming management and crop rotation systems on chlorophyll content, dry matter translocation, and grain quantity and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown in a semi-arid region of Iran. Agronomy 13(4): 1007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041007

Gupta G, Dhar S, Dass A, Sharma V K, Shukla L, Singh R, Kumar A, Kumar A, Jinger D, Kumar D and S Sannagoudar M. 2020. Assessment of bio-inoculants-mediated nutrient management in terms of productivity, profitability and nutrient harvest index of pigeon pea-wheat cropping system in India. Journal of Plant Nutrition 43(19): 2911–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1806302

Hiscox J D and Israelstam G F. 1979. A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration. Canadian Journal of Botany 57(12): 1332–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/b79-163

Idapuganti R G and Ahlawat I P S. 2007. Integrated phosphorus management in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. Indian Journal of Agronomy 52(4): 289–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v52i4.4941

Jackson M L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis, pp.151–54. Pentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.

Kaur G, Ghai N, Kaur J and Singh S. 2015. Growth efficiency and yield of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.) as affected by foliar application of mineral nutrients. Journal of Plant Science and Research 2(2): 130.

Kaur P, Saini K S, Sharma S, Kaur J, Bhatt R, Alamri S, Alfagham A T and Hussain S. 2023. Increasing the efficiency of the rice- wheat cropping system through integrated nutrient management. Sustainability 15(17): 12694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712694

Kumawat N, Singh R P, Kumar R and Om H. 2013. Effect of integrated nutrient management on the performance of sole and intercropped pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy 58(3): 309–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v58i3.4223

Open Government Data 2024. Open Government Data (OGD), platform India, A digital India initiative. https://www.data.gov.in/keywords/DAP (accessed on: 10.1.2025).

Pandey I B, Singh S K and Tiwari S. 2013. Integrated nutrient management for sustaining the productivity of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) based intercropping systems under rainfed condition. Indian Journal of Agronomy 58(2): 192–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v58i2.4171

Paramesh V, Dhar S, Dass A, Kumar B, Kumar A, El-Ansary D O and Elansary H O. 2020. Role of integrated nutrient management and agronomic fortification of zinc on yield, nutrient uptake and quality of wheat. Sustainability 12(9): 3513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093513

Praharaj C S, Ali M, Kumar N, Dutta A, Singh U and Singh R. 2021. Pulses for crop intensification and sustainable livelihood. Indian Journal of Agronomy 66: 60–72.

Rasool A, Ghani A, Nawaz R, Ahmad S, Shahzad K, Rebi A, Ali B, Zhou J, Ahmad M I, Tahir M F and Alwahibi M S. 2023. Effects of poultry manure on the growth, physiology, yield, and yield-related traits of maize varieties. ACS Omega 8(29): 25766–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00880

Richardson A E, Lynch J P, Ryan P R, Delhaize E, Smith F A, Smith S E, Harvey P R, Ryan M H, Veneklaas E J, Lambers H and Oberson A. 2011. Plant and microbial strategies to improve the phosphorus efficiency of agriculture. Plant and Soil 349: 121–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-0950-4

Shivay Y S, Kumar D and Prasad R. 2008. Relative efficiency of zinc sulfate and zinc oxide-coated urea in rice-wheat cropping system. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 39(7–8): 1154–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620801925869

Singh U, Praharaj C S, Singh S S, Hazra K K and Kumar N. 2018. Effect of crop establishment practices on the performance of component cultivars under pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system in IGP. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88(5): 691–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i5.80050

Singh V K, Dwivedi B S, Shukla A K and Mishra R P. 2010. Permanent raised bed planting of the pigeon pea-wheat system on a Typic Ustochrept: Effects on soil fertility, yield, and water and nutrient use efficiencies. Field Crops Research 116(1–2): 127–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.12.002

Varatharajan T, Choudhary A K, Pooniya V, Dass A, Rana D S, Rana K S and Harish M N. 2019. Effect of integrated crop management practices on root-shoot characteristics, yield and nutrient harvest index of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) under irrigated north Indian Plains. Indian Journal of Agronomy 64(2): 270–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v64i2.5267

Weatherley P E and Slatyer R O. 1957. Relationship between relative turgidity and diffusion pressure deficit in leaves. Nature 179(4569): 1085–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1791085a0

Zulfiqar U, Ahmad M, Valipour M, Ishfaq M, Maqsood M F, Iqbal R, Ali M F, Roy R and El Sabagh A. 2023. Evaluating optimum limited irrigation and integrated nutrient management strategies for wheat growth, yield and quality. Hydrology 10(3): 56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10030056