Management of anthracnose disease of cotton (Gossypium spp.) incited by Colletotrichum gossypii using fungicides
584 / 449
Keywords:
Anthracnose, Colletotrichum gossypii, Cotton, Fungicide, Seed cotton yieldAbstract
Anthracnose, caused by Colletotrichum gossypii, poses a significant increasing hazard to cotton (Gossypium spp.) crops. The present study was carried out during rainy (Kharif) seasons of 2020 and 2021 at Cotton Research Station, Sirsa, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana aimed to assess the efficiency of novel fungicides over in vitro as well as in vivo condition against C. gossypii, the causative agent of anthracnose disease in cotton. This experiment was carried on Bt (RCH 773) and non Bt (H1098i) cotton susceptible cultivars in randomized block design (RBD) with four replications for each treatment.. The highest growth inhibition was observed when using the fungicide Azoxystrobin 18.2% + Difenoconazole 11.4% sc (90.48%), followed by Metiram 55% + Pyraclostrobin 5% wg (84.57%). Minimum disease intensity was observed with the fungicide Azoxystrobin 18.2% + Difenoconazole 11.4% sc in cotton cultivars i.e. Bt (7.01%) and non Bt (8.20%) during the years of evaluation with the maximum seed cotton yield of 2590 kg/ha as well as 2105 kg/ha, respectively. The results of this experiment reported that all the fungicides tested have great potential in managing anthracnose disease of cotton and recorded fruitful results as compared to untreated check.
Downloads
References
Ali M, Ali S, Zeshan M A, Binyamin R, Ahmed N, Ghani M U and Khan A A. 2021. Evaluation of different fungicides against Colletotrichum graminicola, the cause of red leaf spot of sorghum. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research 34(3): 599–607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2021/34.3.599.607
Anonymous. 2022. https://www.hau.ac.in/page/o-p-stat Accessed on 15 March, 2024.
Anonymous. 2024. https://texmin.nic.in Annexure-VII, COCPC, 2024. Accessed on 21 June, 2024.
Barre H W. 1909. Cotton anthracnose investigation. (In) Annual Report of South Caroline Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletins 22: 89–118.
Campo-Arana R O, Urango-Esquivel N and Perez-Polo D. 2019. Integrated management of Colletotrichum gloesporioides in yellow passion fruit (Passiflora edulis f. flavicarpa Degener). Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas 36(2): 87–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22267/rcia.193602.120
Cauquil J. 1960. L’ anthracnose en cote d’ Iviove. Cotton et Fibres Tropicales 15: 397–404.
Datar V V, Sontakke M B, Purandary N D and Shinde N N. 1990. Fungicidal control of anthracnose of chillies. Indian Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology 20: 156–58.
Edgerton C W. 1912. The rots of cotton boll. Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 137: 113.
Gawade D B and Suryavanshi A P. 2009. In vitro evaluation of fungicides, botanicals and bioagents against C. trancatum causing soybean anthracnose. Plant Disease Research 24(2): 120–23.
Jagtap G P, Gavate D S and Dey U. 2012. Control of C. truncation causing anthracnose of pod blight of soybean by aqueous leaf extract, bio control agents and fungicides. Journal of Scientific Agriculture 1(2): 39–52.
Kiran R, Akhtar J, Kumar P and Shekhar M. 2020. Anthracnose of Chilli: Status, Diagnosis, and Management. Intech. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93614
Kumar M S, Devi R S J and Reddy B V B. 2015. In vitro evaluation of fungicides and bio-control agents against Colletotrichum capsici, incitant of blight of chickpea. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research 5(6): 229–32.
Lagiere R. 1970. Contribution to the study of boll rot of cotton in El’ Salvador I. A etiology. Review of Plant Pathology 50(4): 220. Mayee C D and Datar V V. 1986. Phyto-Pathometry. Technical Bulletin 1, Special Bulletin 3, pp. 95.
Mayee C D and Mukewar P M. 2007. Loss-inducing diseases of cotton and their management with special reference to Andhra Pradesh. (In) Cotton in Andhra Pradesh, pp. 197–99. Rao N G P, Rao A and Siddiq E A (Eds). Farm and Rural Science Foundation and ANGRAU, Hyderabad,
Mistry D S, Sharma I P and Patel S T. 2008. Evaluation of fungicides, phytoextracts and bio pesticides against die-back of chilli. Journal of Plant Disease Science 3(1): 53–55.
Rony M A R, Hosen S and Bashar M. 2021. Efficacy of chemical fungicides and plant extracts against anthracnose pathogens of Capsicum frutescens L. Bangladesh Journal Botany 50(2): 437–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/bjb.v50i2.54104
Sandipan P B, Patel P S, Patel R K, Chaudhari R I and Patel M C. 2022. Evaluation of different fungicides against boll rot and foliar diseases of cotton under south Gujarat of India. Journal of Plant Development Sciences 14(5): 491–96.
Saxena A, Raghuwanshi R, Gupta V K and Singh H B. 2016. Chilli Anthracnose: The Epidemiology and Management. Frontiers in Microbiology 7: 1527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01527
Tanweer Asif. 2013. Pesticides in Cotton: The Road Ahead. (In) National convention on India cotton: Gearing up for Global leadership, pp. 9–11.
Vincent J M. 1927. Distortion of fungal hyphae in the presence of certain inhibitors. Nature 59: 850.
Yadav L, Yadav N K, Malik V K, Vashisth P and Yadav P. 2024. Screening of cotton genotypes against Colletotrichum gossypii causing anthracnose disease. Journal of Cotton Research and Development 38(2): 219–24.
Yadav L, Yadav N K, Malik V K, Yadav P and Vashisth P. 2025. Delving the potential of biorational products against Colletotrichum gossypii under in vitro conditions: An eco-smart approach. Journal of Cotton Research and Development 39(2): 205–10.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.