Optimizing sunflower (Helianthus annuus)  nutrition in acidic soils: Examining the effects of different doses of conventional and nano form nutrients on concentration, uptake and use efficiency


86

Authors

  • Rohitha D S Sri S. Kariappa college of agriculture (University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru), Kanakapura, Karnataka 562 117, India
  • Mamatha B University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560 065, India
  • Srinivas Reddy K M College of sericulture (University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru), Chintamani, Karnataka 563 125, India
  • Sathish A University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560 065, India
  • Channakeshava S University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560 065, India
  • Lalitha B S University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560 065, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v96i4.167412

Keywords:

Acidic Soil, Efficiency, Nano-fertilizer, Nutrients Concentration, Sunflower, Uptake

Abstract

A two-season field experiment was conducted during the Kharif season in 2021 and 2022 at zonal agricultural research station, GKVK, Bengaluru. The soil was sandy loam (Alfisol) in texture, characterised by low pH levels, typical of acidic environments (pH 5.7) that often limit nutrient availability and the experiment was laid out in a randomised block design with three replications and comprised of 14 treatments, including varying combinations of recommended doses and Nano- Fertiliser. Results revealed that nitrogen, sulphur and zinc concentrations in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) varied significantly with application of treatment T14 (75% RDN + Nano Urea @ 4 ml/l + 25% ZnSO4 + Nano Sulphur @ 200 ppm+ Nano Zinc @500 ppm) compared to treatment T2 (Package of practice (FYM + Bio fertilisers + NPK + Zn + B)), while phosphorus and potassium were not significant. A similar kind of trend was observed in case of uptake of nitrogen, sulphur and zinc and this treatment recorded a significant improvement over other treatment. Furthermore, these findings underscore the potential for integrated use of conventional and nano formulations at optimal level to boost crop productivity without excessive inputs. Nutrients use efficiency of (72.01 kg/kg), phosphorus (26.47 kg/kg) and potassium (35.29 kg/kg) were influenced considerably with application of different levels of conventional and nano fertilisers among different treatment combinations.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Mamatha B, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560 065, India

     

     

References

REFERENCES:

ABASALT, R. A., MORAD, S. AND ZAHRA, R. M., 2015, Effect of K nano-fertilizer and N bio-fertilizer on yield and yield components of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Int. J. Adv. Biol. Biom. Res., 3(1): 138 - 143.

AFSHAR, I., RAHIMIHAGHIGHI, A. AND MINOOSHIRAZI, 2014, Comparison of the effects of spraying different amounts of nano zinc oxide and zinc oxide on wheat. Int. J. Pl. Anim. Environ. Sci., 3 (4): 688 - 693.

AZAMAL, H. AND KHAWAJA, S. S., 2014, Carbon and fullerene nanomaterial in plant system. J. Nano biotechnol., 12: 16.

BADRAN, A. AND SAVIN, I., 2017, Effect of nano-fertilizer on seed germination and first growth stages of bitter almond (Prunus dulcis var. amara). J. Plant Nutr., 40(10): 1439-1447.

BURMANA, U., SAINIB, M. AND PRAVEENKUMAR, S., 2013, Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on growth and antioxidant system of chickpea seedlings. Toxicol. Environ. Chem., 95 (4): 605 - 612.

CHANDANA, P. R., LATHA, K. R., CHINNAMUTHU, C., MALARVIZHI, P. AND LAKSHMANAN, A., 2021, Impact of Foliar Application of Nano Nitrogen, Zinc and Copper on Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Rice. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci., 33 (24): 276 - 282.

FAN, L., YUNHE, W., XIWEN, S., YANQIU, G., ZHICHUN, W., YUN, M. AND JIAN, L., 2012, Effects of combined nitrogen fertilizer and nano-carbon application on yield and nitrogen use of rice grown on saline-alkali soil. J. Food Agric. Environ., 10(1): 558 - 562.

FARNIA, A. AND OMIDI, M. M., 2015, Effect of nano-zinc chelate and nano-biofertilizer on yield and yield components of maize (Zea Mays L.), under water stress condition. Indian J. Natural Sci., 29 (5): 0976 – 0997.

GOMEZ, K.A. AND GOMEZ, A.A., 1984, Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John wiley & sons.

HAFEEZ, A., RAZZAQ, A., MAHMOOD, T. AND JHANZAB, H. M., 2015, Potential of copper nanoparticles to increase growth and yield of wheat. J. Nanosci. Adv. Tech., 1 (1): 6 - 11.

JHANZAB, H. M., FAROOQ, M., WAHID, A., HUSSAIN, M. AND SIDDIQUE, K. H. M., 2015, Sulphur nano particles improve nitrogen use efficiency in wheat. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 38(12): 1821-1831.

LINDSAY, W.L. AND NORWELL, W.A., 1978, Development of DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 42: 421-428.

MA, X., GEISER-LEE, J., DENG, Y. AND KOLMAKOV, A., 2010, Interactions between engineered nano-particles (ENPs) and plants: Phytotoxicity, uptake and accumulation. Sci. Total Environ., 408(16): 3053 - 3061.

MAHAJAN, P., SHAILESH, K., DHOKE, R. K. AND ANAND, K., 2013, Effect of nanoparticles suspension on the growth of mung (Vigna radiata) seedlings by foliar spray method. Nanotechnol., 3: 4052 - 4081.

MANDAL, A., DATTA, R., AND MANJAIAH, K. M., 2015, Zincated nano clay polymer composites (ZNCPC) as controlled releaser Zn formulation: effect on Zn and P uptake in rice and soil microbial activities. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 22(19): 15173-15182.

MOHSEN JANMOHAMMADI, NASER SABAGHNIA, SHAHRYAR DASHTI AND MOJTABA NOURAEIN, 2016, Investigation of foliar application of nano micronutrient fertilizers and nano-titanium dioxide on some traits of barley. 62(2): 148 - 156.

PATEL, G. N., PATEL, P. T., PATEL, P. H., PATEL, D. M., PATEL, D. K. AND PATEL, R. M., 2019, Yield attributes, yield, quality and uptake of nutrients by summer groundnut, Arachis hypogaea L. as influenced by sources and levels of nanosulphur under varying irrigation. J. Oilseeds Res., 8(12): 112 - 136.

PIPER, C. S., 1966, Soil and plant analysis, Hans Pub: Bombay,7: 368-369.

SARKAR, R. K. AND MALLIK, R. B., 2009, Effect of nitrogen, sulphur and foliar spray of nitrate salts on performance of spring sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 79(12): 986 - 990.

SEDGI, M., HADI, M., GHOLI, S. AND TOLUIE, 2013, Effect of nano zinc oxide on the germination parameters of soybean seeds under drought stress. Ann. West Univ. Bio., 16(2): 73 - 78.

SHAILESH K. DHOKE, PRAMOD MAHAJAN, RAJASHRI KAMBLE AND ANAND KHANNA., 2013, Effect of nanoparticles suspension on the growth of mung (Vigna radiata) seedlings by foliar spray method. Nanotech., 3: 159 - 178.

SUMATHI, P. AND KOTESWARA RAO, N., 2007, Effect of Integrated Nitrogen Management on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Sunflower. Indian J. Plant Physiol., 12(1): 46-51.

TAHERI, S., ALIKHANI, H., VALOJAI, S., AND EBRAHIMI, M., 2015, Effect of three different physical forms of ZnO particles (ZnO nano colloid, ZnO nanoparticles and micrometric ZnO) on the growth of corn hybrid. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 38(12): 1832-1841.

WA AL-JUTHERY, H. AND HILAL OBAID AL-MAAMOURI, E., 2020, Effect of Urea and NanoNitrogen Fertigation and Foliar Application of Nano-Boron and Molybdenum on some Growth and Yield Parameters of Potato. Al-Qadisiyah . J. Agric. Sci., 10(1): 253 - 263

Submitted

2025-05-31

Published

2026-04-10

How to Cite

D S, R., B, M. ., K M, S. R., A, S. ., S, C., & B S, L. (2026). Optimizing sunflower (Helianthus annuus)  nutrition in acidic soils: Examining the effects of different doses of conventional and nano form nutrients on concentration, uptake and use efficiency. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 96(4). https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v96i4.167412
Citation