Metabolic fingerprints of rhizosphere microbial communities differ due to increased nitrogen availability and cultivation methods of rice (Oryza sativa)
214 / 188
Keywords:
Aerobic cultivation, Carbon utilisation, Conventional flooding, Microbial community, Nitrogen, Rice rhizosphereAbstract
Microbial metabolic activities in the rhizosphere are essential for plant nutrition and yield. The study was carried out during 2023–2024 at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi to profile the rhizosphere metabolic community fingerprints using Biolog EcoPlateTM assays in rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown on neutral soil under conventional flooded (CF) and aerobic [simulating direct-seeded rice (DSR)] methods, with high (HN, 150 kg N/ha) or low (LN, 25 kg N/ha) nitrogen (N). The experiment was laid out in a randomised block design (RBD). Average well colour development (AWCD) of total and class-specific substrates, diversity indices, and principal component analysis (PCA) were used to assess community-level metabolic activity, diversity, and carbon source utilisation patterns (CSUP). Low-N treatments (CFLN, DSRLN) showed higher AWCD (1.45 and 1.31, respectively) and broader substrate utilisation, indicating enhanced microbial activity and metabolic flexibility. The low-N treatment under DSR (DSRLN) had the most metabolically diverse and even communities, whereas the CF system (CFLN) favoured heterotrophic, oligotrophic communities adapted to anoxia. CSUP revealed differential catabolism of amino and carboxylic acids, with marginal variation in amine and polymer utilisation. PCA separated the CSUP along nitrogen and cultivation methods, high-N CF method (CFHN) favoured copiotrophic degradation of aromatics and polymers, while low-N DSR (DSRLN) promoted oxidative metabolism of keto acids, benzoates, and disaccharides. Functional indices reflected niche-specific adaptation, with DSRLN exhibiting the highest Shannon diversity and CFLN dominated by specialists for distinct carbon classes. Nitrogen availability and cultivation methods act as filters shaping rhizosphere metabolic activity, flexibility, and community stability, influencing sustainable rice cultivation. Therefore, understanding the management of rhizosphere microbiome under DSR is critical to unlock its potential as a sustainable, water-saving alternative to conventional flooded rice.
Downloads
References
Anning D K, Li Z, Qiu H, Deng D, Zhang C, Ghanney P and Shen
Q. 2021. Divergent accumulation of microbial residues and amino sugars in loess soil after six years of different inorganic nitrogen enrichment scenarios. Applied Sciences 11(13): 5788. DOI: 10.3390/app11135788 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11135788
Buckel W. 2021. Energy conservation in fermentations of anaerobic bacteria. Frontiers in Microbiology 12: 703525. DOI: 10.3389/ fmicb.2021.703525 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.703525
Chen J, Arafat Y, Ud Din I, Yang B, Zhou L, Wang J, Letuma P, Wu H, Qin X, Wu L, Lin S, Zhang Z and Lin W. 2019. Nitrogen fertiliser amendment alters the bacterial community structure in the rhizosphere of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and improves crop yield. Frontiers in Microbiology 10: 2623. DOI: 10.3389/ fmicb.2019.02623 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02623
Chen Y, Lin Y, Zhu J, Zhou J, Lin H, Fu Y and Zhou Y. 2024. Transcriptomic analysis of nitrogen metabolism pathways in Klebsiella aerogenes under nitrogen-rich conditions. Frontiers in Microbiology 15: 1323160. DOI: 10.3389/ fmicb.2024.1323160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1323160
Chunmei X, Liping C, Song C, Guang C, Danying W and Xiufu Z. 2020. Rhizosphere aeration improves nitrogen transformation in soil, and nitrogen absorption and accumulation in rice plants. Rice Science 27(2): 162–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2020.01.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2020.01.007
Classen A T, Boyle S I, Haskins K E, Overby S T and Hart S C. 2003. Community-level physiological profiles of bacteria and fungi: plate type and incubation temperature influences on contrasting soils. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 44(3): 319–28. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-6496(03)00068-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00068-0
Delgado-Baquerizo M, Maestre F T, Reich P B, Jeffries T C, Gaitan J J, Encinar D, Berdugo M, Campbell C D and Singh B K. 2016. Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems. Nature Communications 7(1): 10541. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10541
Dresser L, Graham S P, Miller L M, Schaefer C, Conteduca D, Johnson S, Leake M C and Quinn S D. 2022. Tween-20 induces the structural remodeling of single lipid vesicles. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 13(23): 5341–50. DOI: 10.1021/ acs.jpclett.2c00704 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00704
Dunn M F and Becerra-Rivera V A. 2023. The biosynthesis and functions of polyamines in the interaction of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria with plants. Plants 12(14): 2671. DOI: 10.3390/plants12142671 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12142671
Fierer N, Bradford M A and Jackson R B. 2007. Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88(6): 1354–64. DOI: 10.1890/05-1839 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/05-1839
Fu H, Yuan J and Gao H. 2015. Microbial oxidative stress response: Novel insights from environmental facultative anaerobic bacteria. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 584: 28–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2015.08.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2015.08.012
Garland J L. 1997. Analysis and interpretation of community-level physiological profiles in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 24(4): 289–300. DOI: 10.1016/s0168- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.1997.tb00446.x
6496(97)00061-5
Ge Z, Du H, Gao Y and Qiu W. 2018. Analysis on metabolic functions of stored rice microbial communities by Biolog ECO microplates. Frontiers in Microbiology 9: 1375. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01375
Geisseler D and Horwath W R. 2008. Regulation of extracellular protease activity in soil in response to different sources and concentrations of nitrogen and carbon. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 40(12): 3040–48. DOI: 10.1016/j. soilbio.2008.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.09.001
Janniche G S, Spliid H and Albrechtsen H J. 2012. Microbial community-level physiological profiles (CLPP) and herbicide mineralisation potential in groundwater affected by agricultural land use. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 140: 45–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2012.08.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2012.08.008
Ju Y, Jia Y, Cheng B, Wang D, Gu D, Jing W, Zhang H, Chen X and Li G. 2024. NRT1.1B mediates rice plant growth and soil microbial diversity under different nitrogen conditions. AMB Express 14(1): 39. DOI: 10.1186/s13568-024-01683-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-024-01683-7
Keiluweit M, Nico P S, Kleber M and Fendorf S. 2016. Are oxygen limitations under-recognized regulators of organic carbon turnover in upland soils? Biogeochemistry 127: 157–71. DOI: 10.1007/s10533-015-0180-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-015-0180-6
Keylock C. 2005. Simpson diversity and the Shannon-Wiener index as special cases of a generalized entropy. Oikos 109(1):
203–07. DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13735.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13735.x
Luo X, Fu X, Yang Y, Cai P, Peng S, Chen W and Huang Q. 2016. Microbial communities play important roles in modulating paddy soil fertility. Scientific Reports 6: 20326. DOI: 10.1038/ srep20326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20326
Luo X, Zhang L, Lin Y, Wen D and Hou E. 2023. Nitrogen availability mediates soil organic carbon cycling in response to phosphorus supply: A global meta-analysis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 185: 109158. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109158
Mavrodi O V, McWilliams J R, Peter J O, Berim A, Hassan K A, Elbourne L D H, LeTourneau M K, Gang D R, Paulsen I T, Weller D M, Thomashow L S, Flynt A S and Mavrodi D V. 2021. Root exudates alter the expression of diverse metabolic, transport, regulatory, and stress response genes in rhizosphere Pseudomonas. Frontiers in Microbiology 12: 651282. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.651282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.651282
Misu I J, Kayess M O, Siddiqui M N, Gupta D R, Islam M N and Islam T. 2025. Microbiome engineering for sustainable rice production: strategies for biofertilisation, stress tolerance, and climate resilience. Microorganisms 13(2): 233. DOI: 10.3390/ microorganisms13020233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13020233
Nguyen P D, Van Ginkel C G and Plugge C M. 2008. Anaerobic degradation of long-chain alkylamines by a denitrifying Pseudomonas stutzeri. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 66(1): 136–42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00564.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00564.x
Nikel P I, Chavarría M, Fuhrer T, Sauer U and De Lorenzo V. 2015. Pseudomonas putida KT2440 strain metabolizes glucose through a cycle formed by enzymes of the Entner–Doudoroff, Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas, and pentose phosphate pathways. Journal of Biological Chemistry 290(43): 25920–32. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m115.687749 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M115.687749
Omura T, Isobe N, Miura T, Ishii S I, Mori M, Ishitani Y, Kimura S, Hidaka K, Komiyama K, Suzuki M, Kasuya K I, Nomaki H, Nakajima R, Tsuchiya M, Kawagucci S, Mori H, Nakayama A, Kunioka M, Kamino K and Iwata T. 2024. Microbial decomposition of biodegradable plastics on the deep-sea floor. Nature Communications 15(1): 568. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-44368-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44368-8
Parales R E and Harwood C S. 2002. Bacterial chemotaxis to pollutants and plant-derived aromatic molecules. Current Opinion in Microbiology 5(3): 266–73. DOI: 10.1016/s1369- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00320-X
5274(02)00320-x
Philippot L, Raaijmakers J M, Lemanceau P and Van Der Putten W H. 2013. Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nature Reviews Microbiology 11(11): 789–99. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro3109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3109
Rutigliano F A, Marzaioli R, Grilli E, Coppola E and Castaldi
S. 2023. Microbial, physical and chemical indicators together reveal soil health changes related to land cover types in the southern European sites under desertification risk. Pedobiologia 99: 150894. DOI: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2023.150894 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2023.150894
Seo J S, Keum Y S and Li Q X. 2009. Bacterial degradation of aromatic compounds. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 6(1): 278–309. DOI: 10.3390/ ijerph6010278 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph6010278
Shimizu K. 2013. Regulation systems of bacteria such as Escherichia coli in response to nutrient limitation and environmental stresses. Metabolites 4(1): 1–35. DOI: 10.3390/ metabo4010001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo4010001
Soong J L, Marañon-Jimenez S, Cotrufo M F, Boeckx P, Bodé S, Guenet B, Peñuelas J, Richter A, Stahl C, Verbruggen E and Janssens I A. 2018. Soil microbial CNP and respiration responses to organic matter and nutrient additions: Evidence from a tropical soil incubation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 122: 141–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.04.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.04.011
Wang G, Jin J, Chen X, Liu J, Liu X and Herbert S J. 2007. Biomass and catabolic diversity of microbial communities with long-term restoration, bare fallow and cropping history in Chinese Mollisols. Plant Soil and Environment 53(4): 177. DOI: 10.17221/2313-pse. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/2313-PSE
Zhang H, Jiang N, Zhang S, Zhu X, Wang H, Xiu W, Zhao J, Liu H, Zhang H and Yang D. 2024. Soil bacterial community composition is altered more by soil nutrient availability than pH following long-term nutrient addition in a temperate steppe. Frontiers in Microbiology 15: 1455891. DOI: 10.3389/ fmicb.2024.1455891 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1455891
Zhu Z, Bai Y, Lv M, Tian G, Zhang X, Li L, Jiang Y and Ge S. 2020. Soil fertility, microbial biomass, and microbial functional diversity responses to four years fertilisation in an apple orchard in north China. Horticultural Plant Journal 6(4): 223–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpj.2020.06.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpj.2020.06.003
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.