Reaction of menthol mint (Mentha arvensis) genotypes to sweetpotato whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) and bean golden mosaic virus (Begomovirus spp) in northern India


239 / 76

Authors

  • Dwijendra Singh CSIR-Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226 015
  • Neelima Anshul CSIR-Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226 015
  • J R Bahl CSIR-Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226 015

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i8.23059

Keywords:

Begomovirus, Bemisia tabaci, Mentha arvensis, Population, Resistance, Sampling

Abstract

The identification of potential pest resistance to plant genotypes is considered most economical and eco-friendly for integrated pest management programmes in agriculture. In this study, population of sweetpotao whitefly [Bemisia tabaci Genn. (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)] pupae, adult forms, and bean golden mosaic virus (Begomovirus spp) infections were sampled at different stages of growth in various menthol mint (Mentha arvensis Linn.) genotypes under natural field conditions at Lucknow and a variation in resistance potential was observed among genotypes. Among 26 menthol mint genotypes, MA-6, Damroo, Gomti, MAS-31, MAS-3F, MA-5, Sambhav, MAS-216V, MAB-1, MAR-45, MAS-265, Shivalik, and Kushal were found associated with low numbers of pupae while MAB-1, MAS-1-98-1, H. Putra, MAS-92- 3, MA-5, MAS-92-2, Shivalik, MAS-92-1, Kushal, Gomti, Saksham, MAS-35 and Sambhav were found attacked by low number of adult of B. tabaci significantly (P=0.01). However, menthol mints genotypes; MA-6, MAB-1, MA-3 and Kalka were found infected with low number of twigs significantly (P=0.01) by bean golden mosaic virus. Overall, the M. arvensis clone of MAB-1 was found significantly less attacked by pupae and adult of B. tabaci and Begomovirus infection. These pest- and -disease resistant genotypes can be used in future hybridization programmes for developing new high- yielding menthol mint varieties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acharya V S and Bhargava M C. 2008. Morphological basis of resistance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) against whitefly (Bemisia tabaci). Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 78 (9): 818–20.

Perring T M, Cooper A D, Rodriguez R J, Farrar C A and Bellows Jr. T S. 993. Identification of a whitefly species by genomic and behavioral studies. Science 259: 74–7.

Prabhaker N, Toscano N C, Perring T M, Nuessley G, Kido K and Youngman R R. 1992. Resistance monitoring of the sweetpotato whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in the imperial valley of California. Journal of Economic Entomology 85: 1063–8.

Reddy P V R and Aswath C. 2008. Resistance of exotic collections of gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii) against whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) and thrips (Thrips palmi) under polyhouse conditions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 78 (5): 449–52.

Samad A, Gupta M K, Shasany A K, Ajayakumar P V and Alam M. 2009. Begomovirus related to Tomato leaf curl Pakistan virus newly reported in Mentha crops in India. Plant Pathology 58: 404.

Singh Dwijendra and Singh DK. 2004. Varietal resistance of Mentha arvensis Linn. to sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Genn. Journal of Applied Zoological Researches 15: 22–4.

Singh Dwijendra, Singh D K, Bahl J R and Tiwari R K. 2004. Evaluation of different genotypes of Mentha species for resistance potential to sweetpotato whitefly (Bemisia tabaci). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 64: 253–4.

Singh R and Sachan G C. 2004. Elements of Entomology. Rastogi Publications, Meerut.

Singh R K, Rai N and Singh S N. 2010. Response of tomato genotypes to tomato leaf curl virus. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 80 (8): 755–8.

Downloads

Submitted

2012-08-14

Published

2012-08-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Singh, D., Anshul, N., & Bahl, J. R. (2012). Reaction of menthol mint (Mentha arvensis) genotypes to sweetpotato whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) and bean golden mosaic virus (Begomovirus spp) in northern India. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 82(8), 711–3. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i8.23059
Citation