Standardisation of hybrid seed production technology of first Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) hybrid NRCHB 506


354 / 149

Authors

  • Aniruddha Maity Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
  • S K Chakravarty Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
  • J B Yadav Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i9.23828

Keywords:

Date of sowing, Hybrid seed production, Indian mustard, Phenology, Planting ratio, Seed yield

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 2009–10 and 2010–11 to standardise the sowing time and planting ratio of the parental lines of the recently released Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern. & Coss) hybrid NRCHB 506. The results indicated that the optimum sowing time of parental lines of NRCHB 506 is the third week of October to achieve higher yield of good quality hybrid seed. Optimum planting ratio of female to male parental line for hybrid seed production was 8:2. Further increase in number of female rows per male row decreased the plant and plot yield of the hybrid seed production plot. The results pertaining to flowering phenology and characters, seed yield and its attributing traits indicated that delay in sowing beyond October reduces the value of those characters significantly leading to decline in seed yield from seed parent. The primary factor responsible for the reduction of values in the late sowing was the higher temperature during reproductive and seed feeling stage. Sowing in October and growing of plants in relatively high temperature extended the vegetative phase, i e delayed the flowering by four days as compared to that in November sowing which experienced a lower temperature during early growth stage. Delay in sowing reduced the flowering duration which had a direct impact on the number of flowers, siliqua set, seeds/siliqua and finally seed yield/plant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrol D P. 2007. Honeybees rapeseed pollinator plant interaction. Advances in Botanical Research 45: 337–69.

Adamsen F J and Coffelt T A. 2005. Planting date effects on flowering, seed yield, and oil content of rape and crambe cultivars. Industrial Crops and Products 21: 293–307.

Banga S S. 1993. Heterosis and utilization. (in) Breeding Oilseed Brassicas. Labana K S, Banga S S, Banga S K (Eds). Monogr. Theoritical Applied Genetics 19: 21–43.

Bhuiyan M S, Mondol, M R I, Rahaman M A, Alam M S and Faisal A H M A. 2008. Yield and yield attributes of rapeseed as influenced by date of planting. International Journal of Sustainable Crop Production 3: 25–9.

Clay H. 2009. Pollinating hybrid canola-the Southern Alberta Experience. AB Originally presented to NSW Apiarist Association, State Conference.

Cutts T A. 1999. ‘Herbicide resistance enriched hybrid and synthetic seed production and performance in Brassica rapa’. A thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies, The University of Manitoba.

Hall A E. 2001. Crop Responses to Environment. CRC Press LLC,Boca Raton, Florida.

Chauhan S S, Singh K H, Singh V V and Kumar S. 2011. Hundred years of rapeseed-mustard breeding in India: accomplishments and future strategies. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81: 1 093–109

Khichar M L, Yadav Y C, Bishnoi O P and Ramniwas S. 2000. Radiation use efficiency of mustard as influenced by sowing dates, plant spacings and cultivars. Journal of Agrometereology 2: 97–9.

Khushu M K and Singh M. 2005 Thermal response of mustard under rainfed condition of Jammu. Environment and Ecology 23: 683–6.

Mankar K S. 2000. ‘A technology for the exploitation of hybrid vigour in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L) Czern .&Coss ) in absence of restorer system’. Ph D thesis submitted to the P.G. School, IARI, New Delhi.

Morshedi A and Farahbakhsh H. 2009. Effects of sowing time, N and P fertilizers on seed yield, oil and protein production in canola. Plant Ecophysiology 1: 9–15.

Panda B B, Shivay Y S and Bandyopadhyay S K. 2004. Growth and development of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) under different levels of irrigation and date of sowing. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 9: 419–25.

Prasad P V, Craufurd P Q, Kakani V G, Wheeler T R and Boote K J. 2001. Influence of high temperature during pre- and post- anthesis stages of floral development on fruit-set and pollen germination in peanut. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 28: 233–40.

Saidata S A and Hemayati S S. 2009. Effect of sowing date on yield and yield components of three oilseed rape varieties. Plant Ecophysiology 1: 31–5

Selvakumar P. 2003. ‘Studies on pollination requirements in hybrid cauliflower seed production.’ Ph D thesis submitted to the P G School, IARI, New Delhi.

Singh R, Rao V U M, Singh D and Surakant D. 2002. Effect of sowing date and plant density on phenological behaviour, yield and its attributes in oilseed Brassicae. Journal of Oilseeds Research 19: 119–21.

Starner D E, Hamama A A and Bhardwaj H L. 1999. Canola oil yield and quality as affected by production practices in Virginia. (in) Perspectives on New Crops and New Uses, pp 254–56. Janick J (Ed.). ASHS Press, Alexandria, Virginia.

Tunwar N S and Singh S V. 1988. Indian minimum seed certification standards. The Central Seed Certification Board Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, GOI, New Delhi.

Yadav R N. 2002. ‘Pollination studies under different environments and population geometry in sunflower hybrid seed production’. Ph D thesis submitted to the P G School, IARI, New Delhi.

Yadav S K, Chakrabarty S K and Yadav J B. 2007. Standardization of planting ratio for hybrid seed production in Indian mustard. (in) Genetics and Breeding: Heterosis Utilization, Proceedings of the 12th International Rapeseed Congress held at Wuhan, China during 25-30 March 2007.

Downloads

Submitted

2012-09-18

Published

2012-09-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Maity, A., Chakravarty, S. K., & Yadav, J. B. (2012). Standardisation of hybrid seed production technology of first Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) hybrid NRCHB 506. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 82(9), 753–8. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i9.23828
Citation