Yield attributes, yield and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum) + compact mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping under 5:1 row proportion in relation to fertility levels and seeding densities of two wheat varieties
495 / 142
Keywords:
Economics, Fertility level, Seeding density, Wheat mustard intercropping, Wheat variety, Yield, Yield attributesAbstract
A two-year field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2005–06 and 2006–07 at Varanasi on wheat + compact-mustard intercropping in 5:1 row proportion. The treatments involved three fertilizer doses, i e 100%, 120% and 140% of recommended NPK to wheat accompanied with 100% recommended NPK to mustard; two wheat varieties (HD 2824 and HUW 468) and three seed rates of wheat (100 kg, 115 kg and 130 kg/ha). Increasing fertilizer doses from 100% to 140% RFD applied to wheat accompanied with 100% RFD to mustard exhibited marked increase in yield-attributing characters, grain yield and straw yield. Application of 120 and 140% RFD recorded 6.4 and 10.2% higher LER respectively than 100% RFD. Similar trend was observed for RCC, AYL, IA, net returns and monetary advantage. Conversely, all the fertility levels didn't cause any significant variation on yield attributes, yield, LER, AYL and monetary returns of intercrop mustard. The wheat variety HIV 2824 showed distinct superiority over HUW 468 with respect to spikes/m, test weight, grain yield/m, grain yield, straw yield, LER, RCC, net returns and monetary advantage in wheat + mustard intercropping system. Increasing wheat seed rates from 100 to 130 kg/ha reduced the average spike length, test weight and harvest index though the differences being significant only between lowest and highest seed rates. However, increasing wheat seed rates up to highest level resulted in lucid improvement of spikes/m, grain yield/m, grain yield, LER, RCC, net returns and monetary advantage. However, the reverse trend was noticed for AYL and 1A.
Downloads
References
Banik P, Sasmal T, Ghosal P K and Bagchi D K. 2000. Evaluation of mustard (Brassica campestris var. Toria) and legume intercropping under 1:1 and 2:1 row-replacement series systems, Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 185: 9–14.
Bohra J S and Srivastava R K. 2002. Studies on sulphur levels and sources at different fertility levels on yield and output-input ratio of Indian mustard. Research on Crops 3 (3): 538–41.
Chen C, Westcott M, Neill K, Wichman D and Knox M. 2004. Row configuration and nitrogen application for barley–pea inter- cropping in Montana. Agronomy Journal 96: 1730–8.
Malik B S, Sethi A P, Sharma R K, Tiwari V, Chowdhury S, Sinha V C. 2005. Poorva (HD 2824)- a new wheat variety of Eastern India. Indian Farming 54 (10): 3–4.
Srivastava R K and Bohra J S. 2006. Performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum) + Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping in relation to row ratio, Indian mustard variety and fertility levels. Indian Journal of Agronomy 51 (2): 107–11.
Srivastava R K, Bohra J S and. Singh R K. 2007. Yield advantage and reciprotery functions of wheat (Triticum aestivum) + Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping under varying row ratio, variety and fertility level. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 77 (3): 139–44.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.