Bio-efficacy of imidacloprid and bifenthrin against mustard aphid (Lipaphis erysimi) on Brassica rapa subsp oleifera


424 / 145

Authors

  • ANJUMONI DEVEE Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat 785 013
  • A A L H BARUAH Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat 785 013

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i10.24174

Keywords:

Bifenthrin, Dissipation, Efficacy, LC50, Imidacloprid, Lipaphis erysimi, Persistence

Abstract

The efficacy, relative toxicity, residual toxicity and dissipation behaviour of imidacloprid and bifenthrin were evaluated against mustard aphid [Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.)] during 2006-07 and 2007-08. Imidacloprid (RiBo 17.8 SL @ 20, 40 and 60 g ai/ha), bifenthrin (Marker 20 per cent EC @ 60, 80 and 100 g ai/ha) and deltamethrin (as standard check) (Decis 2.8 per cent EC @ 15 g ai/ha) were evaluated against mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) and was found effective in reducing the aphid population in comparision to control. The highest mortality of aphids and marketable yield was registered by imidacloprid @ 60 g ai/ha, while highest cost benefit ratio was found in imidacloprid @ 20 g ai/ha and proved sufficient to optimize the yield. The LC50 values were 0.00017 and 0.00015 for imidacloprid, 0.00152 and 0.00122 for bifenthrin, 0.00199 and 0.00134 for deltamethrin, after 24 and 48 hr of treatment, respectively. Imidacloprid was 8.93 times and bifenthrin 1.10 times more toxic than deltamethrin after 48 hr of treatment. For evaluation of persistence and residual toxicity of imidacloprid the mortality data were taken up to 48 hr, within different exposure periods of 1, 3, 5, 10 and 15 days after application of insecticides. Based on the index of persistence toxicity, the order of effectiveness for the L. erysimi were imidacloprid @ 60 g a.i/ha (1014.23)> imidacloprid @ 40 g a.i/ha (931.37) > imidacloprid @ 20 g a.i/ha (820.41)> deltamethrin 15 g a.i/ha (707.93)> bifenthrin @ 100 g a.i/ha (659.76)> bifenthrin @ 80 g a.i/ha (611.12)>bifenthrin @ 60g a.i/ha (545.25). The dissipation behaviour of imidacloprid under field condition on Brassica rapa L. subsp. oleifera (toria) crop was studied in tender shoots and seeds. The initial deposits of imidacloprid @ 20, 40 and 60 g a.i /ha were 0.830, 1.126 and 1.280, respectively. Imidacloprid residues reached below its detectable level after 5th and 10th day of its application at lower and higher rates. The half life values were 1.44, 1.96, 1.67 days for imidacloprid @ 20, 40 and 60 g a.i/ha, respectively. Based on the observations, a waiting period of at least four days after imidacloprid application @ 20 g a.i/ha is considered safe from point of health hazards due to toxic effect of residues in leaves.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • ANJUMONI DEVEE, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat 785 013
  • A A L H BARUAH, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat 785 013

References

Anonymous. 2009. Package of Practices for Rabi crops of Assam, 138 pp. Assam Agricultural University and Department of Agriculture, Assam.

Battu R .S, Sahoo S K, Jyot G, Garg A and Sandhu K S. 2007. Persistence of acephate and imidacloprid on cotton leaves. Pesticide Research Journal 19 (1): 101–3.

Chinniah C and Ali K A. 2000. Relative efficacy of insecticides/ acaricides against sucking pests of okra. Pest Management and Economic Zoology 8 (2): 111–6.

Choudhury K. 2005. Efficacy of bifenthrin against tea mosquito bug, Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse and its dissipation in tea leaf. MSc (Agri.) thesis, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2011. Food and Agricultural Commodities Production. In: http://www.faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx/ Accessed 09 Feb 2011, 1041 hrs IST

FAO/WHO. 2004. Codex Alimentarius Commission, Draft and revised draft maximum residue limit for pesticides (advanced to step 8 of the Codex procedure), Appendix II, 36th session of Codex Committee meeting held in India.

Gajbhiye V T, Kumar R, Gupta R K and Kalpana. 2000. Translocation and persistence of imidacloprid in tomato. Pesticide Research Journal 12(1): 127–9.

Gopal M, Mukherjee I and Chander S. 2002. Behaviour of - cyfluthrin and imidacloprid in mustard crop: Alternative insecticide for aphid control. Bulletin of Environment Contamination and Toxicology 68: 406–11.

Helal A, Mukharjee I, Gopal M, Ameta O P, Patel B S and Somchoudhary A K. 2005. Multilocational field trials using imidacloprid as seed treatment to propose its MRL in mustard (Brassica campestris Linn.) leaves. Pestology 29 (7): 15–9.

JRG. 2010. Fundamental Report on R&M seed. JRG House, Ashoka Road, Kaloor, Kochi, Kerala.

Jain K L and Ameta O P. 2006. Bioefficacy of imidacloprid and betacyfluthrin against insect pests of chilli. Pestology 30 (1): 36–9.

Kendappa G N, Mallikarjunappa S, Sankar G and Mithyantha M S. 2002. Efficacy of some newer insecticides against green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer) on tobacco. Pestology 26 (9): 13–4.

Kodandaram M H and Dhingra S. 2003. Comparative toxicity of ester and non-ester pyrethroids against Spodoptera litura (Fab.). Pesticide Research Journal 15 (1): 23–5.

Kharbade S B, Kale V D and Dethe M D. 2003. Residues of imidacloprid on chillies. Pestology 2 (1): 18–19.

Kumar R, Dikshit A K and Dureja P. 2000. Metabolism of imidacloprid in Brassica. Pesticide Research Journal 12 (1): 91–5.

Kumar R, Dikshit A K and Prasad S K. 2001. Bioefficacy and residues of imidacloprid in mustard. Pesticide Research Journal 13 (2): 213–7.

Kumar A. 2004. Build up of Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt) on mustard crop. Insect environment. 10 (1): 21–2.

Lal O P. 1996. Integrated pest management for sustainable crop production. (In) Agrochemicals and Sustainable Agriculture, pp 29–44. Roy N K (Ed.). APC Publication Pvt Ltd, New Delhi.

Nemade P W, Wadnerkar D W, Shinde B D, Bansod R S and Zanwar P R. 2007. Evaluation of seed treatment and foliar application effects of imidacloprid against sucking pests of okra. Pestology 31(3): 23–8.

Patil C S and Lingappa S. 2000. Persistent toxicity of imidacloprid to Cheilomenes sexmaculata (Fabricius). Insect Environment 6

(2): 68–9.

Singh D S and Singh J P. 1997. Relative toxicity of pyrethroid and non pyrethroid insecticides to the adults of grey weevil, Myllocerus undecimpustulatus maculosus. Indian Journal of Entomology 59 (4): 354–8.

Singh N N, Prasad M N, Rai V N.1989. Population fluctuation of Lipaphis erysimy (Kaltenback) in relation to abiotic factors. Journal of Aphidology 3: 102–8.

Singh J P and Singh D S. 2001. Relative efficacy of some insecticides and biopesticides as contact poisons against green peach aphid, Myzus persicae. Indian Journal of Entomology 63 (3): 240–3.

Steel R G D and Torrie J H. 1960. Principle and procedures of Statistics, 481 pp. McGraw-Hill Book Company INC, New York.

Downloads

Submitted

2012-10-05

Published

2012-10-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

DEVEE, A., & BARUAH, A. A. L. H. (2012). Bio-efficacy of imidacloprid and bifenthrin against mustard aphid (Lipaphis erysimi) on Brassica rapa subsp oleifera. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 82(10), 845–51. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i10.24174
Citation