Effect of pruning time, severity and tree aspects on harvesting period and fruit quality of low chilling peach (Prunus persica)


190 / 77

Authors

  • AKATH SINGH ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya 793 103
  • B C DEKA ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya 793 103
  • R K PATEL ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya 793 103
  • A NATH ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya 793 103
  • S R MULIEH ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya 793 103

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i10.24177

Keywords:

Early harvest, Pruning, Prunus persica, Quality, Tree aspects

Abstract

Studies were conducted to find out the effect of pruning severity, time and tree aspects on early fruiting, yield and quality characters of Partap peach. Ten years old grafted trees were pruned at fortnightly intervals, i e on 30 October, 15 November and 30 November with two pruning levels, i e 50% and 70% severity (retaining 50% and 30% shoot). Flowering and fruiting was earlier by 15 days in trees pruned on October 30. Fruit size and yield was recorded maximum in trees pruned on October 30 with 50% shoot retention, whereas quality characters, viz. Total soluble solids and acidity was higher in fruits obtained from trees pruned on November 30 with 50% shoot retention. Reducing, non-reducing and total sugars were highest in 50% severity on 30 October. Colour reflectance values were found highest in fruits obtained from trees pruned on October 30 with 50% severity. While comparing the different aspects of the tree, all the physico-chemical parameters were found maximum in fruits of east direction followed by south and minimum in west direction. It was concluded that low chilling peach Partap pruned on 30 October with 50% shoot retention yielded fruits 15 days earlier of superior quality in general and east and south direction of trees particular.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • AKATH SINGH, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya 793 103
  • B C DEKA, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya 793 103
  • R K PATEL, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya 793 103
  • A NATH, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya 793 103
  • S R MULIEH, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya 793 103

References

Dhaliwal G S and Kaur Rajwant. 2003. Effect of time and pruning intensity on age of bearing shoot and fruit quality of ‘Sardar’ guava. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Science 32: 21–4.

Gill K S and Ball J S. 2006. Influence of pruning severity and time on yield and fruit quality of ber cv. Umran. Indian Journal of Horticultural Science 63: 162–5.

Gomez A A and Gomez K A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, pp 680.

Lanzelotti J, Gonzalez B A and Boragno O A. 2005. Different dates of pruning in peach tree. Acta Horticulturae 465: 217–21.

Lewallen Kara Annamarie Senger. 2000. ‘Effects of light availability and canopy position on peach fruit quality’. Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 47 pp.

Mohammed Suleman, Sharma J R, Kumar R and Panwar R D. 2005. Influence of pruning severity on yield and quality of guava. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Science 34: 214–5.

Patel R K, Babu K D, Singh Akath and Yadav D S. 2007. Performance of low chilling peach cultivars under mid hills of Meghalaya. Environment and Ecology 25: 229–31.

Ranganna S. 1997. Manual of Analysis of Fruits and Vegetable Products. Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi.

Shaban A E A and Haseeb G M M. 2009. Effect of pruning severity and spraying some chemical substances on growth and fruiting of guava trees. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environment Science, 5: 825–31.

Singh Amar. 2003. Fruit Physiology and Production, p 540. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.

Singh Devi and Chauhan J S. 1998. Effect of different pruning and nitrogen level on growth, yield and quality of peach (Prunus persica Batch) cv. July Elberta. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Science 27: 92–8.

Stephan Jean, Hervé Sinoquet, Nicolas Donès, Nicolas Haddad, Salma Talhouk and Pierre-Eric Lauri. 2008. Light interception and partitioning between shoots in apple cultivars influenced by training. Tree Physiology 28: 331–42.

Downloads

Submitted

2012-10-05

Published

2012-10-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SINGH, A., DEKA, B. C., PATEL, R. K., NATH, A., & MULIEH, S. R. (2012). Effect of pruning time, severity and tree aspects on harvesting period and fruit quality of low chilling peach (Prunus persica). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 82(10), 862–6. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i10.24177
Citation