GGE biplot based assessment of yield stability, adaptability and mega-environment characterization for hybrid pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)
351 / 70
Keywords:
Cajanus cajan, CMS, Cross over, G × E, Hybrid, Mega-environmentAbstract
GGE biplot methodology is a powerful tool to study relationship among test environments (E), genotypes (G) and genotype-by-environment interaction (GE). Present study was conducted on 10 short-duration genotypes in five test environments for two years, and 16 medium-duration genotypes in six test locations for three years in randomized complete block design with two replications. In short-maturity group three mega-environments (ME) were found—ME1 comprised of Phaltan, Patancheru and Hyderabad1; ME2 and 3 constituted Jalna and Aurangabad, respectively. In scenario of limited resources, Patancheru may be a good testing location for general adaptability of short-duration hybrids, while Aurangabad and Hyderabad1 may be right environments for testing specific adaptation of short-duration cultivars in pigeonpea. ICPH 2433 was a winning genotype in ME1 in terms of high yield and stability. In medium-maturity group, two MEs were observed. Jalna, Jalna 1, Parbhani and Hyderabad grouped together as ME1, while Patancheru and Phaltan formed the second mega-environment (ME2). Parbhani was found to be most representative of all the six test locations. Jalna (ME1) and Phaltan (ME2) produced longest environment vectors, and hence may be regarded as highly discriminating. In medium- maturity group ICPH 2673 was found to be stable and high-yielding genotype for ME1.
Downloads
References
Baker R J 1988. Test for Cross over genotype-environment intreaction. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 68: 405–10.
Bhan M K, Pal S A, Rao B L, Dhar A K, Kang M S. 2005. GGE biplot analysis of oil yield in lemongrass (Cymbopogon spp) Journal of New Seeds 7(2): 127–39.
Bilbro J D and Ray L L. 1976. Environmental stability and adaptation of several cotton cultivars. Crop Science 16: 821–4.
Carver B F, Smith E L and England H O Jr. 1987. Regression and cluster analysis of environment response of hybrid and pureline wheat cultivars Crop Science 27: 659–64.
Crossa J. 1990. Statistical analysis of multilocation trials. Advance in Agronomy 44: 55–85.
Duarte J B and Vencovsky R. 1999. Interação Genótipos × Ambientes. Uma Introdução à Análise AMMI. ESALQ/USP, Ribeirão Preto.
FAOSTAT (Food and Agriculture Organization, Statistics Division). 2011. http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancor
Gabriel K R. 1971. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58: 453–67.
Gauch H G and Zobel R W. 1997. Identifying mega-environment and targeting genotypes. Crop Science 37: 311–26.
Geug S, Zhang Q F and Bassett D M. 1987. Stability in yield and fibre quality of californian cotton. Crop Science 27: 1004–10. Jackson P A, Byth D E, Johnston R P and Fischer K S. 1993.
Genotype x environment interactions in progeny from a barley cross. 1. Patterns of response among progeny genotypes for grain yield and time to anthesis. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 33: 619–27.
Kang M S and Gauch H G (Eds). 1996. Genotype-by-environment Interaction. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press.
Kang M S. 1988. A rank-sum method for selecting high-yielding, stable corn genotypes. Cereal Research Communication 16: 113–5.
Kang M S. 1993. Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in crop performance trials: Consequences for growers. Agronomy Journal 85: 754–7.
Lin C S, Binns M R and Lefkovitch L P. 1986. Stability analysis: Where do we stand? Crop Science 26: 894–900.
Piepho H P. 1999. Stability analysis using the SAS system. Agronomy Journal 91: 154–60.
SAS Institute. 2008. SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 8. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
Saxena K B and Nadarajan N. 2010. Prospects of pigeonpea hybrids in Indian agriculture. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 1: 1 107–17.
Saxena K B, Kumar R V, Chopde V K, Srivastava R K, Gowda C L L, Rao K P C and Bantilan C. 2009. ICPH 2671- The world’s first commercial grain legume hybrid. Paper presented at the APB and SABRAO conference, August 7-15, 2009, Cairns, Australia.
Yan W and Hunt L A 1998. Genotype by intraction and crop yields. Plant Breeding Review 16: 135–78.
Yan W and Hunt L A. 2002. Biplot analysis of diallel data. Crop Science 42(1): 21–30.
Yan W and Kang M S. 2003. GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists and Agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Yan W and Tinker N A. 2006. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: principles and applications. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 86: 623–45.
Yan W, Hunt LA, Sheng Q and Szlavnics Z. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on GGE biplot. Crop Science 40(3): 597–605.
Yan W, Hunt L A, Sheng Q, and Szlavnics Z. 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigations based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science 40: 597–605.
Yan W, Kang M S, Ma B, Woods S and Cornelius P L. 2007. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Science 47: 643–53.
Yan W. 2002. Singular value partitioning in biplots analysis of multi environment trial data. Agronomy Journal 94: 990–6.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.