Evaluation of pear lmillet (Pennisetum glaucum) and mothbean (Vigna acconitifolia) intercropping systems in hyper arid partially irrigated north-western plains zone


186 / 124

Authors

  • B R KURI Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner 334 006
  • R S YADAV Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner 334 006
  • AMIT KUMAWAT Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner 334 006

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i11.24975

Keywords:

Intercropping, Row ratio, Yield, Indices

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif 2008 to evaluate different row ratio of pearl millet + mothbean in the arid region of Rajasthan. The treatments comprised three sole pearl millet at 30, 40 and 60 cm spacing, one sole mothbean and eleven pearl millet + mothbean treatments [1:3, 1:7, 2:2, 2:6, 3:1, 3:5, 4:4, 5:3, 6:2, 7:1 and 2:1 (check) row ratio]. The intercropping of pearl millet + mothbean in 1:7 row ratio closely followed by 4:4, 2:6 and 3:5 row ratio, produced maximum pearl millet equivalent yield (PMEY),  LER and net returns and also better nutrient uptake by these treatments compared to sole and other intercropping treatments. Aggressivity values showed that intercrop mothbean did not offer any competition to pearl millet in different row ratio, while RCC values indicated that there was a yield disadvantage in mothbean in all the intercropping system except 1:7 row ratio. Competition ratio indicated that row ratios such as 3:1 and 2:1 which offer less space to mothbean (intercrop) that leads to lower yield of intercrop as component crop (pearl millet) offer greater competition for mothbean in these row ratios.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • B R KURI, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner 334 006
  • R S YADAV, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner 334 006
  • AMIT KUMAWAT, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner 334 006

References

Hooda R S, Khippal A and Narwal R P. 2004. Effect of fertilizer application in conjunction with bio-fertilizers in sole and intercropping system of pearl millet under rainfed condition. Haryana Journal of Agronomy 20 (1) : 29–30.

Kumar P, Hooda R S, Singh H and Nanwal R K. 2006. Economics of pearl millet legume association as influenced by intercropping and strip cropping system in sandy loam soils. Haryana Agricultural University Journal Research 36: 101–4.

Oferi F and Stern W R. 1987. Cereal legume intercropping systems. Advances in Agronomy 41: 58–79.

Patel A T and Kalyanasundarsan N K. 1988. Research Highlights. AICRPDA, 7 Main centre, Sardar Krushinagar, Gujarat.

Singh P. 1992. ‘Studies on comparative performance of pearl millet [Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leek] based intercropping system with different phosphorus level’. M Sc (Ag) thesis, Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner.

Tetarwal J P and Rana K S. 2006. Impact of cropping system, fertility level and moisture–conservation practices on productivity, nutrient uptake, water use and profitability of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) under rainfed condition. Indian Journal of Agronomy 51 (4) : 263–6.

Willey R W. 1979. Intercropping: its importance and research needs in competition and yield advantages. Field Crops Abstract 32: 1–10.

Downloads

Submitted

2012-11-08

Published

2014-11-08

Issue

Section

Short-Communication

How to Cite

KURI, B. R., YADAV, R. S., & KUMAWAT, A. (2014). Evaluation of pear lmillet (Pennisetum glaucum) and mothbean (Vigna acconitifolia) intercropping systems in hyper arid partially irrigated north-western plains zone. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 82(11), 993–6. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i11.24975
Citation