Development and evaluation of pick positioner for fruit harvesting and tree pruning


204 / 105

Authors

  • MANJEET SINGH Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004
  • C J S PANNU Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004
  • N K CHHUNEJA Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004
  • J S MAHAL Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004
  • ANKIT SHARMA Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v84i1.37172

Keywords:

Center of Gravity (CG), Field Capacity, Fruit Picking, Pick Positioner, Tree Pruning

Abstract

A tractor mounted pick positioner was developed and evaluated, which has a movable platform, persons can stand on the platform and can be lifted to the total height of 9.6 m (32’) for fruit harvesting and tree pruning. The weight of pick positioner is about 470 kg and it act as a cantilever on tractor. The centre of gravity of tractor alone was 67.9 cm from rear axle, whereas the CG of tractor with pick positioner was shifted to 92.6 cm from rear axle. The CG of tractor shifts from 67.9 cm to maximum of 98.1 cm from rear axle in downward position of pick positioner. For amla harvesting, the average picking capacity of three different subjects using pick positioner was found to be 122.3 kg/h having CV 8.2 whereas in case of conventional picking the average picking capacity of three different subjects was 34.7 kg/h having CV 17.2. The results revealed that picking capacity for amla fruit by pick positioner was significantly higher (p = 0.0001) than conventional method. The average field capacity using the pick positioner was found to be 2.73 and 18 kg/h for mahagony and mango fruits respectively. The labour requirement was 2.5, 2.2, 1.51, 1.40, and 1.3 man-h/tree for ashoka, ashoka (longofolia), jamun, alostonia, and mahagony trees respectively, whereas in case of conventional method of tree pruning, an average labour requirement was found to be 06 man-h/tree in simple tree pruning and 24 man-h/tree in case of pruning of thick stems. The fuel consumption during the machine operation varied from 2.0-2.5 l/h when tractor engine was stopped after positioning the platform at required height to 5.0-5.5 l/h when tractor engine was always running during harvesting/pruning. The overall results revealed that labour requirement for tree pruning by pick positioner was significantly (P = 0.0120) lesser than conventional method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous. 2012. http://www.nhb.gov.in (Date of visit of website: 17.01.13)

Baeten J, Donne K, Boedrij S, Beckers W and Claesen E. 2007. Autonomous fruit picking machine: A robotic apple harvester. Full length paper published in 6th International Conference on Field and Service Robotics – FSR 2007, Chamonix: France. Inria-00194739, version 1–7 Dec.

Gaston H P and. Levin J H. 1953.Time and motion studies of apple picking made to determine the possibilities of mechanizing harvest operations. Michigan Quarterly Bulletin, 36(l): 20.

Coppock G E and P J Jutras. 1960. Mechanizing citrus fruit harvesting. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 3(2): 130–2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.41142

Kolhe K P. 2009. Design and development of tractor mounted hydraulic lifter for harvesting spraying and pruning of horticultural fruit trees. International Journal of Agricultural Engineering 2(2): 170–5.

Peterson D L, Miller S S and Wolford S D. 1997. Apple harvest aid for inclined trellised canopies. American Society of Agricultural Engineers 40(3): 529–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.21297

Peterson D L. 2005. Development of a harvest aid for narrow inclined trellised tree-fruit canopies. American Society of Agricultural Engineers 21(5): 803–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.19707

Seamount D T and Opitz K W. 1973. The auto-picker: a two-man positioning machine. Citrograph 59(1): 23–7.

Sumner H R and Hedden S L .1980. Development of a tractor drawn rake for oranges. ASAE Paper No. 80-1528.

Whitney J D, Wheaton T A, Castle W S and Tucker D P H. 1996. Orange grove factors affect manual harvesting rates. Transactions of the ASAE 39(2): 399–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.27515

Downloads

Submitted

2014-01-27

Published

2014-01-27

Issue

Section

Short-Communication

How to Cite

SINGH, M., PANNU, C. J. S., CHHUNEJA, N. K., MAHAL, J. S., & SHARMA, A. (2014). Development and evaluation of pick positioner for fruit harvesting and tree pruning. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 84(1), 149–53. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v84i1.37172
Citation