Soil health as affected by altered land configuration and conservation tillage in a groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) - toria (Brassica campestris var toria) cropping system
310 / 167
Keywords:
Conservation agriculture, Land configuration, Residue management, Soil healthAbstract
A field experiment was conducted during the year 2009-11 at ICAR Research Complex for North Eastern Hill Region (NEHR), Meghalaya to study the influence of land configuration and conservation tillage on soil health in a groundnut-toria cropping system. The experiment consisted of seven treatments [i. flat bed farmer’s practice (FP) no residue; ii. broad beds and furrows (BBF) with residue incorporation; iii. BBF with residue + hedge leaves (Tephrosia sp) incorporation; iv. BBF with residue + hedge leaves (no tillage, NT); v. raised bed (RB) with residue incorporation; vi. RB with residue + hedge leaves incorporation; vii. RB with residue + hedge leaves (NT)] laid out in randomised block design and replicated thrice. The conservation treatments were found to significantly improve biological activity and chemical properties of soil. However, physical properties such as texture and bulk density were not significantly affected by any of the treatments. Infiltration rate and hydraulic conductivity were 108% and 46% higher, respectively, in the treatments under RB with residue + hedge leaves (NT) as compared to FP. Soil microbial biomass carbon was 67% higher under RB with residue + hedge leaves incorporation than FP after the harvest of both the crops in the second year while dehydrogenase activity was 135% higher in RB with residue + hedge leaves (NT) after the harvest of groundnut and RB with residue incorporation after the harvest of toria than FP, respectively. System productivity under RBs were significantly higher than that recorded under BBF and FB. Conservation treatments showed better soil health at the end of the cropping cycles and it is concluded that raised beds along with residue management can provide an alternative and sustainable technology contributing to sustainable agriculture in the NEHR of India which can be extrapolated to other similar areas.
Downloads
References
Abrol I P and Sagar S. 2006. Sustaining Indian agriculture – conservation agriculture the way forward. Current Science 91(8): 1 020–25.
Ali M and Venkatesh M S. 2009. Pulses in improving soil health. Indian Farming February 2009: 18–22.
Benjamin J G, Halvorson A D, David C N and Mikha M M. 2010. Crop management effects on crop residue production and changes in soil organic carbon in the central Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 102(3): 990–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2009.0483
Black C A. 1965. Methods of analysis. Chemical and Microbial Properties, Part II, p 1569. No. 9. American Society of Agronomy Incorporation, Madison, WI, USA.
Bouwer H. 1986. Intake rate: cylinder infiltrometer. (In) Methods of Soil Analysis, Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd edn, pp 825–844. Klute A. (Ed). Agronomy monograph no. 9, ASA & SSSA, Madison. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c32
Brookes P C and Joergensen R G. 2006. Microbial biomass measurements by fumigation-extraction. (In) Microbiological Methods for Assessing Soil Quality, pp 77–83. Bloem J, Hopkins D W and Benedetti A (Eds). CABI Publishing, Oxfordshire, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851990989.0077
Bujarbaruah K M. 2004. Organic farming: opportunities and challenges in North-eastern region of India. (In) Souvenir, International conference on organic food, 14-17 February 2004, ICAR Research Complex for NEH region, Umiam, Meghalaya, pp. 7–13.
Casida L E Jr, Klein D A and Sautoro T. 1964. Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Science 98: 371–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196412000-00004
Derpsch R. 2005. The extent of conservation Agriculture adoption worldwide: Implications and impact. Proceedings of the Third International Congress of Conservation Agriculture, 3-7 October, Nairobi, Kenya, pp 15.
Dam R F, Mehdi B B, Burgess M S E, Madramootoo C A, Mehuys G R and Callum I R. 2005. Soil bulk density and crop yield under eleven consecutive years of corn with different tillage and residue practices in a sandy loam soil in central Canada. Soil & Tillage Research 84, 41–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.08.006
Feng F X, Huang G B, Chai Q and Yu A Z. 2010. Tillage and straw management impacts on soil properties, root growth and grain yield of winter wheat in northwestern China. Crop Science 50: 1 465–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.10.0590
García C, Hernández T and Costa F. 1997. Potential use of dehydrogenase activity as an index of microbial activity in degraded soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 28: 123–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629709369777
Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd edition. International Rice Research Institute, John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.
Goyal S, Walia M and Kumar V. 2009. Effect of bed and conventional planting system on organic and microbial bio-mass carbon, enzyme activities and carbon and nitrogen mineralization. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 43(4): 251–6.
Jackson M L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt Ltd, New Delhi.
Knudsen D, Peterson G A and Pratt P F. 1982. Lithium, sodium and potassium. (In) Method of Soil Analysis, Chemical and Microbiological Properties, pp 228–38. Page A L, Miller R H, Keeney D R (Eds). ASA &SSSA, Madison.
Martin-Reuda I, Munoz-Guerra L M, Yunta F, Esteban E, Tenerio J L and Lucena J J. 2007. Tillage and crop rotation effects on barley yield and soil nutrients on a Calciortidic Haploxeralf. Soil & Tillage research 92: 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.10.006
Mina B L, Saha S, Kumar N, Srivastava A K and Gupta H S. 2008. Changes in soil nutrient content and enzymatic activity under conventional and zero-tillage practices in an Indian sandy clay loam soil. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 82: 273–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-008-9189-8
Parihar C M, Rana, K S and Parihar M D. 2009. Crop productivity, quality and nutrient uptake of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) - Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) cropping system as influenced by land configuration and direct and residual effect of nutrient management. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 79(11): 927–30.
Prasad R K, Kumar V, Prasad B and Singh A P. 2010. Long term effect of crop residues and zinc fertilizer on crop yield, nutrient uptake and fertility build up under rice- wheat cropping system in calciorthents. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 58(2): 205–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2348-7542.2015.00030.3
Saha R and Ghosh P K. 2010. Effect of land configuration on water economy, crop yield and profitability under rice based cropping systems in north east India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 80(1): 16–20.
Singh B, Chanasyk D S and Mc Gill W B. 1995. Soil hydraulic properties of an Orthic Black Chernozem under long-term tillage and residue management. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 76: 63–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss96-010
Singh G, Babu R and Chandra S, 1981. Soil Loss Predictions in India. Bulletin No 12/D9, CS&WCRTI, Dehra Dun, India; 70. Singh G, Marwaha T S and Kumar D. 2009. Effect of resource conserving techniques on soil microbiological activities parameters under long term maize (Zea mays) – wheat (Triticum aestivum) crop rotation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 79(2): 94–100.
Stone L R and Schlegel A J. 2010. Tillage and crop rotation effect on soil physical properties in the west-central plains. Agronomy Journal 102(2): 483–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2009.0123
Subbiah B V and Asija G L. 1956. A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science 25: 259–60.
Venkateswarlu B, Malaviya D D. 2004. Performance of groundnut as influenced by land configurations and fertilizer management under rainfed conditions of south Saurashtra. The Andhra Agriculture Journal 5: 292–95.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.