Critical limit of copper in soil and plant for predicting response of oat (Avena sativa) in soils of Haryana

NARENDER; R S MALIK; R P NARWAL

doi:10.56093/ijas.v84i3.38588

Authors

NARENDER CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana 125 004, India
R S MALIK CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana 125 004, India
R P NARWAL CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana 125 004, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v84i3.38588

Keywords:

Brayâ€™s % yield, Copper, Critical limit, Haryana soils, Oat

Abstract

In order to evaluate critical level in oat (Avena sativa L.), laboratory and a screen house experiment was conducted at CCS HAU, Hisar. Bulk surface soil samples (0-15 cm) were collected from eighteen (18) different locations, in the state representing major soil groups of Haryana. The results of the study revealed that the relationship between Bray's per cent yield against DTPA-Cu in soil and Cu concentration in plants indicated critical deficiency level of Cu in soil as 0.30 mg/kgand for oat plant it was 11.7 mg/kg which was statistically also at par.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous. 1990. Annual report, All India Coordinated Scheme of Micro and Secondary Nutrients and Pollutant Elements in Soils and Plants. Indian Institute of Soil Science, Bhopal, pp 14.

Cate R B, Jr and Nelson L A. 1965. A rapid method for correlation of soils test analysis with plant response data. Bull. No. 1, Inroduction Soils Testing Series Techneques.

Cate R B, Jr and Nelson L A. 1971. A simple statistical procedure for partitioning soil test correlation data into two classes. Soil Science Society of America Proceeding 35: 658–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1971.03615995003500040048x

David J. Spurgeon Svendsen Claus and Tipping Edward. 2004. Derving soil critical limits for Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb: A method based on free ion concentration. Environmental Science Technology. 38(13): 3 623–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es030155h

Jackson M L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis. Advance Course, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Khan Z L, Hussain A, Ashraf M and McDowell L R. 2006b. Mineral status of soils and forages in South Western Punjab- Pakistan. Micro-minerals. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science 19: 1139–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1139

Lindsay W L and W A Norvell. 1978. Development of DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42: 421–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x

Perira J V, McDowell L R, Conard J H, Wilkinson N S and Martin F G. 1997. Mineral status of soils, forages and cattle in Nicaragua. I. microminerals. Rev Fac Agronomy 14: 73–89.

Prabowo A, McDowell L R, Wilkinson N S, Wilcox C J and Conard J H.1990. Mineral status comparisons between grazing cattle and water buffalo in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Buffalo Journal 1: 17–32.

Rathore G S, Gupta G P, Khamparia R S and Sinha S B. 1978. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 26: 59.

Rawat P S. 1981. Micronutrient status of some soils of U.P. Hills. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 29: 208.

Reuter D J, Alston A M and Mc Farlane J D. 1988. Occurrence and correction of manganese deficiency in plants. (In) Manganese in Soils and Plants, pp 205–24. Graham R D, Hannam R J and Uren N C (Eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrech, the Netherlands. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2817-6_15

Sakal R, Singh A P, Singh B P and Sinha R B. 1984. Evaluation of some chemical extractants for predicting response of wheat grown in pots to copper in Sub-Himalayan soils. Journal of Agricultural Science 102: 659–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600042209

Singh A K and Nongkynrih P. 2000. Critical limit of copper for predicting response of rice to copper application on wetland rice soils of Meghalaya. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 48(2): 406–8.

Steel R G D and Torrie J H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics, Second Edition. McGraw-Hill Book Co, New York.