Productivity and economics of castor (Ricinus communis) – based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions


325 / 225

Authors

  • S K SHARMA Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Ambala City, Haryana
  • JAGDEV SINGH Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana 125 004, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v84i3.38602

Keywords:

Castor, Castor equivalent yield, Greengram, Intercropping, Land equivalent ratio

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rainy season of 2006 to 2009 at Dryland Research Farm of Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar with the objective to assess the productivity of castor (Ricinus communis L.) in various plant geometries and to see the feasibility of growing various intercrops in castor under rainfed conditions. Fourteen treatments consisting of castor sole at 75 cm and 90 cm, castor paired at 60:90 cm and 60:120 cm, intercropping of 1 row of greengram, moth bean, clusterbean, cowpea and pearl millet in castor paired row system of 60:90 cm and intercropping of 2 rows of greengram, moth bean, clusterbean, cowpea and pearl millet in castor paired row system of 60:120 cm were tested in randomized block design with three replications. Intercropping of 2 rows of greengram in 60:120 cm castor paired row system gave significantly higher castor equivalent yield (1.35 tonnes/ha), net returns (Rs 9 674/ha), benefit: cost ratio (1.63), monetary advantage index (2 345) and income equivalent ratio (1.71). Also, intercropping of 1 row of greengram in 60:90 cm castor paired row system was found to be more productive and remunerative than moth bean, clusterbean, cowpea and pearl millet intercropping systems. Intercropping of green gram in paired row planting system of castor either in 1 or 2 rows was found superior than other intercrops in terms of biological parameters like land equivalent ratio, area time equivalent ratio and relative crowding co-efficient.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dhimmar S K. 2009. Effect on growth and yield of rabi castor in pulses intercropping under varying planting geometry. American-Eurasian Journal of Scientific Research 4(3): 165– 8.

Kumar Subhash. 2002. Effect of planting pattern and fertilizer management on castor (Ricinus communis)-based intercropping system. Indian Journal of Agronomy 47(3): 355–60.

Prasad S N, Singh R K and Kumar Ashok. 2011. Performance of four intercropping systems under variable monsoon onset conditions in rainfed semi-arid region of Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Agronomy 56(1): 41–6.

Porwal M K, Agarwal S K and Khokhar A K. 2006. Effect of planting methods and intercrops on productivity and economics of castor (Ricinus communis)-based intercropping systems. Indian Journal of Agronomy 51(4): 274–7.

Srilatha A N, Masthan S C and Shaik M. 2002. Production potential of castor intercropping with legumes under rainfed conditions. Journal of Oilseeds Research 19(1): 127–8.

Tuti, M D, Mahanta D, Mina B L, Bhattacharyya R, Bisht, J K and Bhatt J C. 2012. Performance of lentil (Lens culinaris) and toria (Brassica campestris) intercropping with wheat (Triticum aestivum) under rainfed conditions of north-west Himalaya. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 82 (10): 841–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i10.24163

Willey R W. 1979. Intercropping: Its importance and research needs. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crops Abstract 32: 1–10.

Downloads

Submitted

2014-03-04

Published

2014-03-04

Issue

Section

Short-Communication

How to Cite

SHARMA, S. K., & SINGH, J. (2014). Productivity and economics of castor (Ricinus communis) – based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 84(3), 432–5. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v84i3.38602
Citation