Comparative study of soil fertility status of cold desert Ladakh region before and after cloudburst

S ACHARYA; N SINGH; S B MAURYA; R B SRIVASTAVA

doi:10.56093/ijas.v84i4.39455

Authors

S ACHARYA Defence Institute of High Altitude Research (DIHAR), DRDO, C/o 56 APO, Leh-Ladakh 901 205
N SINGH Defence Institute of High Altitude Research (DIHAR), DRDO, C/o 56 APO, Leh-Ladakh 901 205
S B MAURYA Defence Institute of High Altitude Research (DIHAR), DRDO, C/o 56 APO, Leh-Ladakh 901 205
R B SRIVASTAVA Defence Institute of High Altitude Research (DIHAR), DRDO, C/o 56 APO, Leh-Ladakh 901 205

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v84i4.39455

Keywords:

Cold desert, Flash flood, Leh-Ladakh, Soil nutrient loss

Abstract

Present study was undertaken to determine loss of soil organic carbon, major and micronutrient status of cold desert Ladakh region as a result of unprecedented cloudburst in August 2010. Heavy rainfall (250 mm) within an hour leading to flash floods resulted in severe loss of standing crops spreading over 1400 ha of agriculture land besides destruction of human, animal lives, infrastructures. In most of the affected areas, top fertile soil completely washed away resulting in severe depletion of various major and micro nutrients essential for good soil health. Soil pH was recorded 8.66 and organic carbon severely depleted from 1.09% to only 0.24% making the soil very loose and poor in WHC. N, P and K (115.4, 1.0 and 103.4 kg/ha respectively) and micronutrient contents were also severely
reduced as compared to original soil. These losses have severe long-term effects on crop productivity and economy of the region. Some ameliorative measures have also been mentioned for improving soil health and sustainable crop production.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bougoucos G H. 1951. Determination of particle sizes. Soil Agronomy Journal 43: 434–8.

Brejda J J and Moorman T B. 2001. Identification and interpretation of regional soil quality factor for the central high plains of mid western USA, in sustaining the global farm. (In) 10 International Soil Conservation Organization, Purdue University.

Herdershot W H, Lalande H and Duquette M. 1993. Soil reaction and exchangeable acidity. (In) Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, pp 141–5. Carter M R (Ed), Canadian Society of Soil Science Lewis, Boca Raton, FL.

Karlen D L, Andrews S S and Doran J W. 2001. Soil quality, current concepts and applications. Advances in Agronomy 74: 1–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(01)74029-1

Lillesand T M and Keifer R W. 2000. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, 4th edn. John Wiley, New York.

Lindsay W L and Norvell W A. 1978. Development of DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42: 421–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x

Natarajan A, Hegde R, Naidu L G K, Raizada A, Adhikari R N, Patil S L, Rajan K and Sarkar D. 2010. Soil and plant nutrient loss during the recent floods in North Karnataka: Implications and ameliorative measures. Current Science 99(10): 1 333–40.

Olsen S R, Cole C V, Watanabe F F and Dean L A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Circular No. 939, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA.

Subbiah B V and Asija G L. 1956. A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science 25: 259–60.

Walkley A and Black I A. 1934. An examination of the Detjare method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration. Soil Science 37: 29– 36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003

Wienhold B J, Andrews S S and Karlen D L. 2004. Soil quality: a review of the science and experiences in the USA. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 26: 89–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EGAH.0000039571.59640.3c