Biochemical and nutritional characterization of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cultivars
673 / 324
Keywords:
Antinutritional, Cicer arietinum, Nutritional, Pulses, QualityAbstract
Thirty nationally released chickpea cultivars were evaluated for carbohydrate composition, soluble proteins, total lipids and anti-nutritional factors such as phenolic compounds, tannins, bound fructose of sucrose and raffinose family oligosaccharides, phytic acid, saponins, trypsin inhibitors and activities of enzymes related to them such as acid and alkaline phosphatases and a-galactosidase. Phytic acid showed a lot of diversity between cultivars and varied from 4.74-20.40 mg/g. Avrodhi, BG 256 and Virat were found to be nutritionally important as they had higher protein content (241.5 mg/g–261.5 mg/g) and starch content was found to be between 412.4 mg/g–485.5 mg/g. Avrodhi and BG 256 had lower content of tannin, phytic acid, saponin and trypsin inhibitors and the content of bound fructose of raffinose family oligosaccharides was found to be minimum in Avrodhi. Virat had the highest protein content among kabuli cultivars and it had lower amount of total phenols, flavonols, tannins and phytic acid. HC 1, BG 1053, Pant G 186 and PBG 1 had protein content between 200.0 mg/g–211.5 mg/g and had higher content of tannin, saponin, phytic acid and total phenols. Five cultivars namely HC 3, Vishal, ICCV 10, JG 315 and Saki 9516 had most of the anti-nutritional factors in medium content. Bound fructose of raffinose family oligosaccharides in kabuli cultivars were found to be in the range of 8.31-10.06 mg/g whereas in desi a lot of variation was observed and it ranged from 5.53 mg/g to 10.13 mg/g. All the cultivars were found to cluster in major four groups on the basis of principal component analysis. The result showed the diversity between nutritional and antinutritional factors in the cultivars that could be further used by plant breeders to develop superior genotypes.
Downloads
References
Adegunwa M O, Adebowale A A and Solano E O. 2012.Effect of thermal processing on the biochemical composition, antinutritional factors and functional properties of beniseed (Sesamum indicum) flour. American Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2: 175–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajbmb.2012.175.182
Aguilera Y, Martin-Cabrejas M A, Benitez V, Molla E, Lopez- Andreu F J and Esteban R M. 2009. Changes in carbohydrate fraction during dehydration process of common legumes. Journal of Food Composition and Anaysis 22: 678–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2009.02.012
Akinyede A I, Amoo I A and Eleyinmi A F. 2005. Chemical and functional properties of full fat and defatted Dioclea reflexa seed flours.Journal of Food Agricultural and Environment 3: 112–5.
Alexander J, Auounsson G A, Benford D, Cockburn A, Cravedi J P, Dogliotti E, Domenico A D, Fernandez-cruz M L, Fink G J, Furst P, Galli C, Grandjean P, Gzyl J, Heinemeyer G, Johansson, N, Mutti A, Schlatter J, Leeuwen R, van Petegham, C and Verger P. 2009. Saponin in Madhuca longifolia L. as undesirable substance in animal feed. European Food Safety Authority 979: 1–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2009.979
Bansal R, Dixit G P and Gopalakrishna T. 2011. Screening of pea genotypes for antinutritional factors and protein content. Journal of Food Legumes 24: 160-2.
Boye J, Zare F and Pletch A. 2010. Pulse proteins : Processing, characterization, functional properties and applications in food and feed. Food Research International 43: 414–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.003
Brinch-Pedersen H, Sorensen L D and Holm P B. 2002. Engineering Crop Plants: getting a handle on phosphate. Trends in Plant Science 7: 119–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02222-1
Celestine A A, Onwuchekwa O, Udu A I, Chuks O E and Patrick M A. 2012. Characterization of cowpea cultivars for variations in seed contents of some antinutritional factors (ANFs). Continental Journal of Food Science and Technology 6 : 25 – 34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5707/cjfst.2012.6.1.25.34
Champ M M J. 2002. Non-nutrient bioactive substances of pulses. Brazilian Journal of Nutrition 88: 307–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN2002721
Dubois M, Gills K N, Hamilton J K, Robers P A and Smith F. 1956. Colorimetric method for the determination of sugars and related substances. Annalytical Chemistry 28: 350–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017
Ekop A S, Obot I B and Ikpatt E N. 2008. Anti-nutritional factors and potassium bromated content in bread and flour samples in Uyo Metropolis. Nigerian Journal of Chemistry 5: 736–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/530596
Gebrelibanos M, Tesfaye D, Raghavendra Y and Sintayeyu B. 2013. Nutritional and health implications of legumes. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Research 4: 1 269–79.
Hidvegi M and Lasztity R. 2002. Phytic acid content of cereals and legumes and interaction with proteins. Periodica Polytechnica Ser Chem Eng 46: 59–64.
Horn-Ross P L, Barnes S, Lee M, Coward L, Mandel E, Koo J, John E M and Smith M. 2000. Assessing phytoestrogen exposure in epidemiologic studies: development of a database (United states). Cancer Causes and Control 11: 289–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008995606699
ICRISAT. 2007. Annual Report 2006. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, AP, India.
Jain K A, Kumar S and Panwar J D S. 2009. Antinutritional factors and their detoxification in pulses : A Review. Agricultural Reviews 30: 64–70.
Kaur S, Gupta A K and Kaur N. 2000. Effect of GA3, kinetin and indole acetic acid on carbohydrate metabolism in chickpea seedlings germinating under water stress. Plant Growth Regulation 30: 61–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006371219048
Kerem Z , German-Shashoua H and Yarden O. 2005. Microwave- assisted extraction of bioactive saponins from chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 85: 406–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1989
Khalil A A, Mohamed S S, Taha S F and Karlsson N E. 2006. Production of functional protein hydrolysates from Egyptian breeds of soyabean and lupin seeds. African Journal of Biotechnology 5: 907–16.
Khandelwal S, Udipi S A and Ghurge P. 2010. Polyphenols and tannins in indian pulses: Effect of soaking , germination and pressure cooking. Food Research International 43: 526–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.036
Khattab R Y and Arntfield S D. 2009. Nutritional quality of legume seeds as affected by some physical treatments. 2. Antinutritional factors. LWT – Food Science and Technology 42: 1 113–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2009.02.004
Lowry O H, Rosebrough N T, Farr A L and Randall R J. 1951. Protein measurement with folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry 19: 265–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6
Maheri-Sis N, Chamani M, Sadeghi A A, Mirza- Aghazadeh A and Aghajanzadeh-Golshani A. 2008. Nutritional evaluation of kabuli and desi type chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) for ruminants using in vitro gas production technique. African Journal of Biotechnology 7: 2 946–51.
Mohamed K R, Abou- Arab E A, Gibriel A Y, Rasmy N M H and Abu-Salem F M. 2011. Effect of legume processing treatments individually or in combination on their phytic acid content African Journal of Food Science and Technology 2: 36–46.
Nikolopoulou D, Grigorakis K, Stasini M, Alexis MN and Iliadis K. 2007. Differences in chemical composition of field pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars: Effects of cultivation area and year. Food Chemistry 103: 847–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.09.035
Ozer S, Karakoy T, Baloch F S, Killan B and Ozkan H. 2010. Nutritional and physiochemical variation in Turkish kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) landraces. Euphytica 175: 237–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-010-0174-3
Panhwar F. 2005. Chemistry and biochemistry of legume with cultural activities in Sindh. Digitalverlag GmbH, Germany.
Raboy V. 2001 Seeds for a better future ‘low phytate’ grains help to overcome malnutrition and reduce pollution. Trends in Plant Science 6: 458–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02104-5
Raboy V. 2002. Syposium: Plant Breeding: A new tool for fighting micronutrient malnutrition. Journal of Nutrition 132: 503S–505S. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/132.3.503S
Ramakrishna V, Rani J P and Rao P R. 2006. Antinutritional factors during germination in Indian bean (Dolichos lablab L.) seeds. World Journal of Dairy Food Science 1: 06–11.
Rehman Z U and Shah W H. 2005. Thermal heat processing effect on antinutrients, protein and starch digestibility of food legumes. Food Chemistry 91: 327–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.06.019
Shim S I, Jun W J and Kang B H. 2003. Evaluation of nutritional and antinutritional componants in Korean wild legumes Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 58: 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAL.0000041166.10069.6f
SunejaY, Kaur S, Gupta, A K and Kaur N. 2011. Levels of nutritional constituents and antinutritional factors in black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). Food Research International 41: 621–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.12.020
Trichopoulou A and Georga K. 2004. Composition Tables of Foods and Greek Dishes, 3rd edn. Parisisanon Publications. Athens.
Upadhyaya H P, Dwivedi S C, Ambrose M, Ellis N, Berger J, Smypal P, Debouk D, Duc G, Dumet P, Flavelt A, Sharma S K, Mallikarjun N and Gowela C L L. 2011. Legume genetic resources; management, diversity assessment and utilization in crop improvement. Euphytica 180: 27–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0449-3
Vasishtha H and Srivastava R P. 2011. Effect of dehusking and cooking on sapogenols of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) genotypes. Indian Journal of Agricultural Biochemistry 24: 60–4.
Vasudeva S and Vishwanathan K H. 2010. Hydration behavior of food grains and modeling their moisture pick up as per Perleg’s equation: PartII. Legumes. Journal of Food Science and Technology 47: 42–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-010-0013-5
Wang N, Hatcher D W, Toews R and Gawalko E. 2009. Influence of cooking and dehulling on nutritional composition of several varieties of lentils. LWT – Food Science and Technology 42: 842–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2008.10.007
Wang N, Hatcher D W, Tyler R T, Toews R and Gawalko E J. 2010. Effect of cooking on composition of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Food Research International 43: 589–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.07.012
Wang N, Hatcher DW and Gawalko E J. 2008. Effect of variety and processing on nutrients and certain antinutrients in field peas (Pisum sativum). Food Chemistry 111: 132–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.03.047
Wang T L, Domoney C, Hedley C L, Lasey R, Grusak M A. 2003. Can we improve the nutritional quality of legume seeds? Plant Physiology 131: 886–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.102.017665
Yasmin A, Zeb A, Khalil A W, Paracha G M and Khattak A B. 2008. Effect of processing on antinutritional factors of red kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Food and Bioprocess Technology 1: 415–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-008-0125-3
Zamindar N, Baghekhandan M S, Nasipour A and Sheikhzeinoddin M. 2011. Effect of line, soaking and cooking time on water absorption, texture and splitting of red kidney beans. Journal of Food Science and Technology 10: 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0234-2
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.