Performance of transgenic Bt cotton of different Bt events under IPM in rainfed situation


304 / 156

Authors

  • S B PATIL Agricultural Research Station, Dharwad Farm, Dharwad, Karnataka 580 007
  • HAREESHA K BADIGER Agricultural Research Station, Dharwad Farm, Dharwad, Karnataka 580 007
  • B B BHOSLE Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, Maharashtra 431 402

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v84i6.41453

Keywords:

Bt events, IPM, Sucking pests and bollworms, Transgenic cottons

Abstract

The field experiment was carried out at ARS, Dharwad farm, Karnataka, India during 2010-11 to study the performance of Bt cotton hybrids, viz. Bunny BG-I, Bunny BG-II, JK Durga and Nathbaba developed through different Bt events under IPM practices. The performance of the Bt hybrids with IPM practices (module) was compared with farmers practices. IPM module encompassed, Bt cotton seeds treated with imidacloprid 70WS, sowing of redgram as a refuge, detopping of shoot tip, installation of pheromone traps, and selective use of chemicals for sucking pests control, whereas farmers practice relied only on chemical interventions. The results revealed that among the Bt genotypes, Bunny BG-II under IPM, recorded lower population of aphids, thrips, leaf hopper and mirid bugs (3.94,9.09,2.07/3 leaves and 3.10/25 squares respectively) followed by Bunny BG-I(4.44, 9.74, 2.26/3 leaves and 3.12/25 squares respectively). However non-significant variation among the genotypes was observed under IPM. Further, irrespective of the modules, bollworm population was not observed in any of the Bt cotton genotypes. Although the larval population of Helicoverpa was recorded in Non Bt, the population was considerably low with IPM practice (0.98/plant) as compared to the farmers practice (1.96/plant) due to target specific interventions. The fruiting bodies damage was negligible in both the modules with hybrids containing two genes compared to hybrids with single Bt gene. On the contrary, modules with non Bt cotton registered significantly higher fruiting bodies damage. Among the genotypes, Bunny BG-II integrated in IPM registered higher seed cotton yield of 25.20 q/ha followed by 24.57 q/ha in Nathbaba with more profit. It is evident from the results that performance of Bunny BG-II was found to be better as indicated by lower infestation and higher seed cotton yield under IPM practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adamczyk J J Jr, Adams L C and Hardee D D. 2001. Field efficacy and seasonal expression profiles for terminal leaves of single and double Bacillus thuringiensis toxin cotton genotypes. Journal of Economic Entomology 94(6): 1 589–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-94.6.1589

Badiger H K, Patil S B, Udikeri S S and Chattannavar S N. 2011. Comparative efficacy of single (BG-I) and stacked Bt-cotton hybrids (BG-II) under IPM Practices. Journal of Cotton Research and Development 26 (1): 117–23.

Bambawale O M, Singh A, Sharma O P, Bhosle B B, Lavekar R C, Dhandapani A, Tanwar R K, Tamhankar V, Rathod K S and Patange N R. 2004. Performance of Bt cotton MECH-162 Bt under Integrated Pest Management in farmers participatory field trial in Nanded District, Central India. Current Science 86: 900–9.

Bheemanna M, Patil B V, Hanchinal S G, Hosamani A C and Bansi A B. 2008. Comparative performance and economics of Bollgard-II cotton under irrigated condition. Journal of Cotton Research and Development 22(1) 118–21.

Gore J, Leonard B R and Adamcyzk J J Jr. 2001. Bollworm survival on Bollgard and Bollgard II cotton flower bud and flower components. Journal of Economic Entomology 94(6): 1 445–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-94.6.1445

Jackson R E, Bradley J R and Van D J W. 2003. Bollworm population production and associated damage in Bollgard and Bollgard II cottons under insecticide-treated and non-treated conditions. Proceedings of Beltwide Cotton Conference, National Cotton Council of America, Nashville, TN, USA, pp 381–2.

James C. 2010. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2010. ISAAA Brief No. 42, Ithaca, New York, USA.

Kannan M, Uthamasamy S and Mohan S. 2004. Impact of insecticides on sucking pests and natural enemy complex of transgenic cotton. Current Science 86: 726–9.

Kranthi K R and Kranthi N R. 2004. Modelling adaptability of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) to Bt cotton in India. Current Science 87: 1 096–107.

Kranthi K R, Naidu S, Dharwad C S, Tatwawadi A, Mate K, Patil E, Bharose A A, Behera G T, Wasaskar R M and Kranthi S. 2005. Temporal and intra-plant variability of Cry1Ac expressing in Bt-cotton and its influence on the survival of cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera). Current Science 89(2): 291–8.

Mann R S, Gill R S, Dhawan A K and Shera P S. 2010. Relative abundance and damage by target and non target insects on Bollgard and Bollgard II cotton cultivars. Crop Protection 29: 793–801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2010.04.006

Patil S B Udikeri S S and Khadi B M. 2003. Integrated pest management with genetically modified cotton hybrids in India. Proceedings of World Cotton Research Conference-III, 9-13 March 2003, Cape Town, South Africa, pp 959–66.

Patil S B, Patil B V, Vandal N B, Hirekurubar R B and Udikeri S

S. 2011. Development and validation of Integrated Pest Management strategies for Bt cotton under rainfed ecosystem. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81(5): 450–4.

Strickland G R and Annells A J. 2005. The seasonal dynamics of arthropods in conventional, INGARD® and Bollgard II® cotton genotypes in a winter production system at Kununurra, Bentley Delivery Centre WA 6983 @ State of Western Australia, pp 1– 13.

Udikeri S S, Patil S B, Nadaf A M and Khadi. 2003. Performance of Bt-cotton genotypes under unprotected conditions. Proceedings of World Cotton Research Conference-III, 9-13 March 2003, Cape Town, South Africa, pp 1 282–6.

Udikeri S S, Patil S B, Satyanarayana C, Rachapa Patil S S and Khadi B M. 2004. Nipping – a cultural paradigm for effective management of insect pests in cotton. (In) International Symptum Strategies Sustainable Cotton Production, – A G Vision, 23-25 November 2004, vol 3, pp 227–9.

Venugopal K, Ramasami M and Thigarajan C P. 2002. Risk assessment and its management in Bt cotton in India. (In) Nationnal Seminar on Bt Cotton Scenario with Special Reference to India, 23 May 2002, UAS, Dharwad, pp 70–84.

Downloads

Submitted

2014-06-11

Published

2014-06-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

PATIL, S. B., BADIGER, H. K., & BHOSLE, B. B. (2014). Performance of transgenic Bt cotton of different Bt events under IPM in rainfed situation. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 84(6), 714–9. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v84i6.41453
Citation