Mutagenesis and digital image analysis of mutants for quality attributes of native Cynodon dactylon


286 / 135

Authors

  • AJAI KUMAR TIWARI Directorate of Floricultural Research, New Delhi 110 012
  • RAMESH KUMAR Directorate of Floricultural Research, New Delhi 110 012
  • GUNJEET KUMAR Directorate of Floricultural Research, New Delhi 110 012
  • GANESH B KADAM Directorate of Floricultural Research, New Delhi 110 012
  • T N SAHA Directorate of Floricultural Research, New Delhi 110 012
  • GIRISH K S Directorate of Floricultural Research, New Delhi 110 012
  • BHARAT TIWARI Directorate of Floricultural Research, New Delhi 110 012

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v84i6.41470

Keywords:

Cynodon dactylon, Colour, Image processing, Turf grass

Abstract

The ability to capture information of turf grass in situ makes digital camera based image analysis, a viable tool to quantify turf grass (Cynodon dactylon Pers.) in field experiments. In addition to colour quantification, digital image analysis has been used successfully to quantify percentage turf grass cover and has also been proved to be useful in quantifying turf parameters such as weed infestation, disease incidence, herbicide toxicity, leaf area and recovery from injury. Colour is one of the major criteria used to evaluate the quality of turf and lawn. To generate variability in Bermuda grass to select genotypes responsive to low management, gamma-ray irradiation was used for induction of dwarfness and other quality attributes. Five dwarf mutant lines (DFR 440, DFR-C-444, DFR-C-445, DFR-C 446 and DFR-C-448) were isolated. In the present study, camera and image analysis technique is applied to measure turf colour by its reflectance in the HSB colour scale. The data depicts that the dwarf mutant lines had better quality of lower canopy height, shorter internodes and shorter leaves than the parent. It is demonstrated that image analysis is a suitable non-destructive tool to assess turf grass colour in a reproducible and calibrated manner, over a wide span of structural and colour attributes of turf grass.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baghzouz M, Devitt D A and Morris R L. 2007. Assessing canopy spectral reflectance of hybrid Bermuda grass under various combinations of nitrogen and water treatments. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 23 (6): 763–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.24055

Camelo M G A, Camacho D B H, Martínez D V A A, Arenas- Ocampo M L, Bello P L A and Aparicio J A R. 2012. Digital image analysis of diverse Mexican rice cultivars. Journal of Food Science in Agriculture 92 (13): 2 709-14. doi: 10.1002/ jsfa.5693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.5693

DaCosta M, Wang Z and Huang B. 2004. Physiological adaptation of Kentucky bluegrass to localized soil drying. Crop Science 44: 1307–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.1307

Freund R J and Wilson W J. 1993. Statistical Methods. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

Goodenough A E and Goodenough A S. 2012. Development of a rapid and precise method of digital image analysis to quantify canopy density and structural complexity. ISRN Ecology. http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/619842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/619842

Karcher D E and Richardson M D. 2003. Quantifying turfgrass colour using digital image analysis. Crop Science 43: 943–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.9430

Keskin M, Dodd R B, Han Y J and Khalilian. 2003. Predicting visual quality ratings of turfgrass research plots using spectral reflectance. Paper Number: 031114, ASABE Meeting Presentation.

Laurinavicius A, Laurinaviciene A, Dasevicius D, Elie N, Plancoulaine B, Herlin B C P. 2012. Digital image analysis in pathology: benefits and obligation. Analytical Cellular Pathology (Amst) 35 (2):75–8. doi: 10.3233/ACP-2011-0033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/243416

Mirik M, Michels G J J, Kassymzhanova Mirik S, Elliott N C, Catana V, Jones D B, Bowling R. 2006. Using digital image analysis and spectral reflectance data to quantify damage by greenbug (Hemitera: Aphididae) in winter wheat. Computers and Electronicsin Agriculture 51(1-2): 86-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2005.11.004

Morris K N. 2002. A Guide to NTEP Turfgrass Ratings. The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP).

Newton A C. 2007. Forest Ecology and Conservation: A Handbook of Techniques. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK,

Richardson M D, Karcher D E and Purcell L C. 2001. Quantifying turfgrass cover using digital image analysis. Crop Science 41: 1 884–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.1884

Stafford R, Adam G H and Goodenough A E. 2013. Using long- term volunteer records to examine dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius) nestbox selection. Public Library Of Science 8(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067986

Downloads

Submitted

2014-06-12

Published

2014-06-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

TIWARI, A. K., KUMAR, R., KUMAR, G., KADAM, G. B., SAHA, T. N., S, G. K., & TIWARI, B. (2014). Mutagenesis and digital image analysis of mutants for quality attributes of native Cynodon dactylon. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 84(6), 733–6. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v84i6.41470
Citation