Enhancing nutrient use and sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) productivity with reduced cost through drip fertigation in western Maharashtra

D D PAWAR; S K DINGRE; A G DURGUDE

doi:10.56093/ijas.v84i7.41997

Authors

D D PAWAR Interfaculty Department of Irrigation Water Management, Post Graduate Institute, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra 413 722
S K DINGRE Interfaculty Department of Irrigation Water Management, Post Graduate Institute, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra 413 722
A G DURGUDE Interfaculty Department of Irrigation Water Management, Post Graduate Institute, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra 413 722

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v84i7.41997

Keywords:

Economics, Fertigation schedule, Nutrient availability, Nutrient uptake, Water soluble fertilizers

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Interfaculty Department of Irrigation Water Management, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri (Maharashtra) during three consecutive years 2007-2010 to study the yield, nutrient use and cost economics for sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) cultivation under different fertigation schedules. The experiment comprised 100, 80 and 60 per cent water soluble fertilizers (WSF) applied through drip in two schedules and results were compared with three control treatments. The 100 per cent fertigation as per growth stages (schedule B) showed higher cane yield (187.85 tonnes/ha) and sugar yield (22.00 tonnes/ha); however, it was on par with 100% fertigation in uniform equal splits (schedule A) and 80% fertigation (schedule B). The study indicated that drip irrigation resulted into 25 % increase in sugarcane yield whereas drip with fertigation resulted into 42 % increase in yield as compared to conventional method. Application of water soluble fertilizers had positive effect on periodical availability of nutrients and uptake than conventional fertilizer. The higher net seasonal income (Rupees 226 195 per ha) and net extra income over conventional method (Rupees 66 246 per ha) were obtained in 100 % fertigation as per schedule B however, the economical parameters were on par with 100 % fertigation as per schedule A and 80% fertigation as per schedule B. The application of 80 % water soluble fertilizers as per schedule B through drip irrigation was found best practice to obtain better yield, improve nutrient and water use as well as cost economics among the practices studied.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bangar A R, and Chaudhari B C. 2004. Nutrient mobility in soil, uptake, quality and yield of Suru sugarcane as influenced by drip-fertigation in medium vertisols. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science 52(2): 164–71.

Dalri A B, and Cruz R L. 2008. Productivity of sugarcane fertigation with NK by subsurface drip. Engenharia Agricola 28(3): 516– 24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162008000300012

Mahendran S, Mahendran P P, Sakthivel S, Rajarathinam P and Balaji T. 2007. Effect of irrigation levels and integrated nutrient management for pit method of cane cultivation under drip fertigation system. (In) National Seminar on Fertigation in Sugarcane. Vasant Dada Sugar Institute, Pune, pp 42–52.

Mahendran S and Dhanalakhmi M. 2003 Effect of crop geometry and drip fertigation on growth and yield of sugarcane crop. (In) Proceedings of 65th Annual Convention of the Sugar Technologists’ Association of India, 22-24 August 2003, Bhubaneshwar, pp 80–7.

Ng Kee Kwong K F and Deville J. 1994. Application of N-labelled urea to sugarcane through a drip-irrigation system in Mauritius. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 39(3): 45–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00750250

Parkinson J A and Allen S E. 1975. A wet oxidation procedure for determination of N and other mineral nutrients in biological material. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 6: 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00103627509366539

Panse V G and Sukhatme P V. 1985. Statistical Method for Agricultural Workers, pp 347, 4th Edn. Indian Council of Agriculture Research, New Delhi.

Raskar B S and Bhoi P G. 2001. Productivity of sugarcane influenced by planting techniques and sources of fertigation under drip irrigation. Indian Sugar 50 (11): 801–10.

Ravikumar V, Vijayakumar G, Simunek J, Chellamuthu S, Santhi R and Appavu K. 2011. Evaluation of fertigation scheduling for sugarcane using a vadose zone flow and transport model. Agricultural Water Management 98(9): 1 431–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.04.012

Shukla S K. 2007. Growth, yield and quality of high sugarcane (Saccharurn officinarum) genotypes as influenced due to planting seasons and fertility levels. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 77 (9): 569–73.

Singh D, Chhonkar P K and Pandey R N. 1999. Soil Plant Water Analysis: A Methods Manual, pp 160. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.

Singh G K, Yadav R L and Shukla S K. 2010. Effect of planting geometry, nitrogen and potassium application on yield and quality of ratoon sugarcane in sub-tropical climatic conditions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 80(12): 1 038–42.

Tan Hongwei, Zhou Liuqiang and Xie Rulin 2009. Sugarcane requirement of water and effect of fertigation on sugarcane. Agricultural Sciences and Technology 10(4): 175–82.

Veeraputhiran R, Balasubramanian R, Pandian B J, Chelladurai M, Tamilselvi R and Renganathan V G. 2012. Effect of subsurface drip fertigation on cane yield, water use efficiency and economics of sugarcane. Madras Agricultural Journal 99 (4/6): 255–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.10.100059