Effect of chemical fertilizers and microbial inoculations on soil properties in cassava (Manihot esculenta) growing Vertisols of Tamil Nadu
319 / 145
Keywords:
Available nutrients, Biocontrol agents, Biofertilizers, Microbial biomass carbon, Soil enzymesAbstract
Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) is an important subsidiary food and industrial raw material in the tropics. Considering the importance of the crop, an on farm experiment was conducted to study the effect of NPK fertilizer rate and biocontrol agents (Trichoderma and Pseudomonas fluorescens) and biofertilizers (Azospirillum, AM fungi and phosphorus solubilising bacteria) on soil chemical, biochemical and microbial biomass carbon in cassava growing Vertisols of Tamil Nadu during 2008 and 2009. The study was conducted in split plot design with two levels of NPK fertilizer as main plot treatments and eight microbial inoculations as subplot treatments. Azospirillum with Trichoderma (170.58 kg/ha), AM fungi with Trichoderma (57.85 kg/ha) and Trichoderma alone (473.70 kg/ha) significantly increased available nitrogen, phosphorus and exchangeable potassium by reducing the amount of NPK. Pseudomonas fluorescens with Trichoderma at 50 per cent recommended NPK rate increases the available iron in soil. The AM fungi with Trichoderma significantly increased available manganese and zinc compared to other inoculations at 50 per cent recommended NPK rate. Azospirillum with Trichoderma at the recommended NPK rate increased the urease enzyme activity (835.21 mg urea hydrolysed/g soil/h) compared to other treatments. The soil application of all cultures at 50 per cent recommended NPK rate increased soil dehydrogenase and b glucosidase enzyme activities. Interaction effect showed significantly higher microbial biomass carbon in AM fungi with Trichoderma at 50 per cent recommended NPK rate (3792.45 µg/g soil) and was on par with soil application of all cultures at 100 per cent and 50 per cent recommended rate. In general microbial inoculations at 50 per cent recommended rate gave on par or significantly higher results compared to uninoculated control at recommended NPK rate.
Downloads
References
Altomare C, Norvell W A, Bjõrkman Tand Harman G E.1999. Solubilization of phosphates and micronutrients by the plant- growth-promoting and biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum Rifai 1295-22. Applied Environmental Microbiology 65(7): 2 926–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.65.7.2926-2933.1999
Bashan Y. 1998. Inoculants of plant-growth promoting bacteria for use in agriculture. Biotechnology Advances 16(4): 729–70. Benitez T, Delgado-Jarana J, Rincon A, Rey M and Limon M C. 1998. Biofungicides: Trichoderma as a biocontrol agent against phytopathogenic fungi. Recent Research Developments in Microbiology 2: 129–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(98)00003-2
Bradgett R. 2005. The biology of soil – A community and ecosystem approach. (In) Biology of habitats, pp 68-70. Crawley M J, Little C, Southwood T R E and Ulfstrand S (Eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Broadbent F E, Hill G N and Tyler K B. 1958. Transformations and movement of urea in soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 22: 303–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1958.03615995002200040010x
Byju G. 2001. Soil analysis – a laboratory manual. Central Tuber Crops Research Institute (CTCRI), Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.
Casida LE, Kelvin Jr D A and Santoro T. 1964. Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Science 98: 371–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196412000-00004
Crowley D E, Wang Y C, Reid C P P and Szaniszlo P J. 1991. Mechanisms of iron acquisition from siderophores by microorganisms and plants. Plant and Soil 130: 179–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011873
Duarah I, Deka M, Saikia N and Deka Boruah H P. 2011. Phosphate solubilizers enhance NPK fertilizer use efficiency in rice and legume cultivation. 3 Biotech 1: 227–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-011-0028-2
Eivazi F and Tabatabai M A. 1988. Effects of trace elements on urease activity in soils. Soil biology and Biochemistry 9: 9–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(77)90054-2
Howeler R H and Sieverding E. 1983. Potentials and limitations of mycorrhizal inoculation illustrated by experiments with field-grown cassava. Plant and Soil 75: 245–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02375570
Hridya A C, Byju G and Misra R S. 2012. Effect of biocontrol agents and biofertilizers on root rot, yield, harvest index and nutrient uptake of cassava. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science (accepted). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2012.702896
Kim K Y, Jordan D and McDonald G A. 1998. Effect of phosphate solubilizing bacteria and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae on tomato growth and soil microbial activity. Biology and Fertility of Soil 26: 79–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050347
Knudsen D, Peterson GA, Pratt PF. 1982. Lithium, sodium and potassium. (In) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties, pp 225–45. Page A L (Ed). ASA, SSSA Madison, WI. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c13
Manjunath A and Habte M. 1988. Development of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection and the uptake of immobile nutrients in Leucaena leucocephala. Plant and Soil 106: 97– 103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02371200
Nair G M, Ramanathan S and Asokan Nambiar T. 2004. Agrotechniques of tuber crops. CTCRI, Kerala, India.
Nogueira M A, Nehls U, Hampp R, Poralla K and Cardoso E J B N. 2007. Mycorrhiza and soil bacteria influence extractable iron and manganese in soil and uptake by soybean. Plant and Soil 298: 273–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9379-1
Okon Y and Itzigsohn R. 1995. The development of Azospirillum as a commercial inoculant for improving crop yields. Biotechnology Advances 13: 365–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-9750(95)02004-M
Olsen S, Cole C V, Watanabe F S, Dean L A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular 939, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Page A L, Miller R H, Keeney D R. 1982. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2, Chemical and microbiological properties, Agronomy Series No. 9, ASA, SSSA, Madison, WI.
Perotti E B R and Pidello A. 1999. Effect of Azospirillum brasilense inoculation on urease activity in soil and gamma-sterilized soil. Revista Argentina de Microbiologia, 31: 36–41.
SAS Institute Inc. 2002. SAS/STAT software, Version 9, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
Sundara B, Natarajan V and Hari K. 2002. Influence of phosphorus solubilising bacteria on the change in soil available phosphorus and sugarcane yields. Field Crop Research 77: 43–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00048-5
Tilak K V B R, Ranganayaki N, Pal K K, De R, Saxena A K, Nautiyal C S, Mittal S, Tripathi A K and Johri B N. 2005. Diversity of plant growth and soil health supporting bacteria. Current Science 89(1): 136–50.
Vance E D, Brookes P C and Jenkinson D S. 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass carbon. Soil Biology Biochemistry 19: 703–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6
Vázquez M, César S, Azcón R, Barea J M. 2000. Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and other microbial inoculants (Azospirillum, Pseudomonas, Trichoderma) and their effects on microbial population and enzyme activities in the rhizosphere of maize plants. Applied Soil Ecology 15: 261–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(00)00075-5
Walkley A and Black I A. 1934. An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37: 29–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
Young C C, Lai W A, Shen F T, Hung M H, Hung W S, and Arun A B. 2003. Exploring the microbial potentiality to augment soil fertility in Taiwan. (In) Proceedings of the 6th ESAFS International Conference on Soil Management Technology on Low Productivity and Degraded Soils, Taipai, Taiwan, pp 25– 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0387-7604(02)00150-x
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.