Genetic variations for herbicide tolerance (Imazethapyr) in chickpea (Cicer arietinum)


396 / 113

Authors

  • S K CHATURVEDI International Crop Research Centre on Semi-arid Tropics, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh
  • ASKI MURALEEDHAR Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208 024
  • P M GAUR Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208 024
  • MISHRA NEELU Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208 024
  • KULDEEP SINGH Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208 024
  • N NADARAJAN Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208 024

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v84i8.43088

Keywords:

Chickpea, Elite breeding lines, Herbicide tolerance, Imazethapyr (Pursuitâ„¢), Reference set

Abstract

Plant resistance has been widely recognized as the most potential and successful way to minimize losses due to biotic stresses including weeds in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Weeds pose great threat to chickpea production through competing for natural resources. Herbicides are the most successful weed controlling agents. Presently we do not have chickpea genotypes having tolerance to post emergence herbicides. This study was undertaken to identify the sources of resistance to the post emergence herbicide in chickpea. 509 chickpea accessions (reference set and elite breeding lines) were screened during September to November 2011 for the post emergence herbicide Imazethapyr (Pursuit™) tolerance. After preliminary screening, 31 most tolerant and 9 most sensitive genotypes were identified. Later these 40 genotypes were re-evaluated during November 2011 to February 2012. Accessions, viz. ICC 1164, IPC 2010-81 and IPC 2008-59 were found to be most tolerant. Lines such as ICC 8522, ICC 6874 and ICC 5434 were recorded as the most sensitive.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Balyan R S and Bhan V M. 1984. Promising herbicides for weed control in chickpea. Indian Journal of Weed Science 16(2): 69–75.

Bisen C R and Tiwari J P. 1983. Chemical weed control in gram. Indian Journal of Weed Science 15(2): 223–5.

Boutsalis P and Powles S B. 1995. Inheritance and mechanism of resistance to herbicides inhibiting acetolactate synthase in Sonchus oleraceus L. Theoritical and Applied Genetics 91: 242–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00220884

Chant S R. 2004. Imidazolinone tolerance in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.). M Sc Thesis, University of Saskatchewan.

Economic Survey. 2011-2012. http://indiabudget.nic.in/survey.asp FAOSTAT. 2010. FAO statistical year book [Internet]. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Available from: http://www.faostat.fao.org

Gaston S, Zabalza A, Gonza´lez E M, Arrese-Igor C, Aparicio- Tejo PM, Royuela M. 2002. Imazethapyr, an inhibitor of the branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis, induces aerobic fermentation in pea plants. Physiol Plantarum. 114(4): 524–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1140404.x

Grichar W J, Sestak D C, Brewer K D, Besler B A, Stichler C R, Smith D T. 2001. Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) tolerance and weed control with soil-applied herbicides. Crop Protection 20 (5): 389–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00147-2

Hanson B D and Thill D C. 2001. Effects of imazethapyr and pendimethalin on lentil (Lens culinaris), pea (Pisum sativum), and a subsequent winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) crop. Weed Technology 15: 190–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2001)015[0190:EOIAPO]2.0.CO;2

Hutchinson C M. 2001. Evaluation of weed control and crop injury by herbicides in north Florida potato production. Hastings Research and Education Centre, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, p 13.

http://www.weedscience.org/summary/MOASummary.asp Kolkman J M, Slabaugh M B, Bruniard J M, Berry S , Bushman B S and Olungu C. 2004. Acetohydroxyacid synthase mutations conferring resistance to imidazolinone or sulfonylurea herbicides in sunflower. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109: 1 147–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1716-7

Lee J M and Owen M D K. 2000. Comparison of acetolactate synthase enzyme inhibition among resistant and susceptible Xanthium strumarium biotypes. Weed Science 48: 286–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0286:COASEI]2.0.CO;2

Little D L and Shaner D L. 1991. Absorption and translocation of the imidazolinone herbicides. The Imidazolinone Herbicides, pp 53–69. D L Shaner and S L O’Conner (Eds). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

Manijeh, Hoseiny Rad and Shobha Jagannath. 2011. Effect of herbicide Imazethapyr (pursuit™) on chickpea seed germination. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 44(3): 224–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03235400902952723

Moyer J R and Esau R. 1996. Imidazolinone herbicide effects on following rotational crops in Southern Alberta. Weed Technology 10(1): 100–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890037X00045784

Mullen C L, Dellow J J and Tonkin C J. 2000. Weed control in winter crops. NSW Agric. DUBBO NSW 2830, Australia, p 76.

Panwar K S and Pandey K. 1977. Weed control studies in Bengal gram. Indian Journal of Agronomy 22(4): 257–9.

PC report AICRIP chickpea 2012-13. Indian Institutes of Pulses Research, Kanpur, pp 1–3.

Peterson D E, Regehr D L, Thompson C R and Al-Khatib K. 2001. Herbicide Mode of Action, [Internet] Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, Kansas State University (KS): Available at: http://www.oznet.ksu.edu/library/crpsl2/c715.pdf

Saxena M C and Yadav D S. 1976. Proceedings of International Workshop on Grain Legumes, ICRISAT, Hyderabad, India, pp 31–61.

Stidham M A. 1991. Herbicides that inhibit acetohydroxyacid synthase. Weed Science 39: 428–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500073197

Siyuan Tan, Richard R Evans, Mark L Dahmer, Bijay K Singh and Dale L Shaner. 2005. Imidazolinone-tolerant crops: history, current status and future. Pest Management Science 61: 246– 57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.993

Taran B, Warkentin T D, Vandenberg A, and Holm F A. 2009. Variation in chickpea germplasm for tolerance to imazethapyr and imazamox herbicides. Canadian Journal of Plant Sciences 90: 139–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/CJPS09061

Van Eerd L L, McLea M D, Stephenson G R and Hall J C. 2004. Resistance to quinclorac and ALS-inhibitor herbicides in Galium spurium is conferred by two distinct genes. Weed Research 44: 355–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2004.00408.x

Downloads

Submitted

2014-08-07

Published

2014-08-08

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

CHATURVEDI, S. K., MURALEEDHAR, A., GAUR, P. M., NEELU, M., SINGH, K., & NADARAJAN, N. (2014). Genetic variations for herbicide tolerance (Imazethapyr) in chickpea (Cicer arietinum). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 84(8), 968–70. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v84i8.43088
Citation