Effect of organic amendments on the productivity and quality of produce and soil in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)-onion (Allium cepa) cropping system
303 / 183
Keywords:
Microbial population, Organic amendments soil health, Quality, Soil fertility, SustainabilityAbstract
Field experiments was conducted during 2010-12 at Bangalore to study the effect of sources on the quality of soil, crop and sustainability of yield in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) onion (Allium cepa L.) cropping system involving biodigested liquid organic manure (BDLM), enriched biodigested liquid organic manure (EBDLM),cow urine (CU) vis-a-vis recommended doses of fertilizers for irrigated groundnut (FYM at 10 tonnes + 25:75:37.5 kg N:P2O5:K2O/ha) and onion (FYM at 30 tonnes + 125:50:75 kg N:P2O5:K2O/ha) with three foliar sprays of panchagavya (PG) and vermiwash (3 percent) at 30, 60 and 75 days after sowing. Application of EBDLM at 25 kg N equivalent/ ha + 3 sprays of 3% PG for groundnut, EBDLM at 125 kg N equivalent/ha + 3 sprays of PG at 3% for onion registered significantly higher organic carbon content and available nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulphur (0.63%, 355.2, 78.30, 190.8 and 36.3 kg/ha, respectively) and significantly more number of bacteria (32.58 × 106CFU / g of soil), fungi (21.77 × 103 CFU/g of soil) and actinomycetes (12.28 × 103CFU/g of soil) after the harvest of second crop in groundnut-onion sequence cropping system. Pod yield of groundnut (2335 kg/ha) and bulb yield of onion (37.78 tonnes/ha) were significantly higher with the application of EBDLM at 25 kg N equivalent/ha + 3 sprays of PG at 3% (groundnut)/ EBDLM at 125 kg N equivalent/ha + 3 sprays of 3% PG (onion). Sustainability yield index was also higher with above treatment (0.90 and 0.89 for groundnut and onion, respectively). Quality parameters like oil and protein yield (875 and 364 kg /ha, respectively) in groundnut and total soluble solids, reducing, non-reducing sugars, ascorbic and pyruvic acid (16.93, 3.66, and 8.66%, 25.27 mg 100/g and 12.82 μ moles/g, respectively) of onion bulb were significantly superior with above treatment.
Downloads
References
Anonymous. 2012. Foreign Agricultural Service. Annual report, USDA, p 18.
Hazarika U K, Munda G C, Bujorboruah K M, Das A, Patel D P, Prasad K, Rajeshkumar, Danwar A S, Tomar J M S, Bordoloi J, Sharma M and Girin G. 2006. Components of nutrient management. Nutrient Management in Organic Farming: 15–53.
Hussaini M A and Amans E B. 2000. Yield bulb size distribution and storability of onion under different levels of N fertilization and irrigation regime. Tropical Agriculture 77(3): 146–9.
Jat R S, Devidayal H N, Meena, Virendra Singh and Gedia M V. 2011. Long term effect of nutrient management and rainfall on pod yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) in groundnut based cropping system. Indian Journal of Agronomy 56(2): 14–9.
Naveen Kumar A T. 2009. Effect of FYM and bio digested liquid manure on growth and yield of groundnut under rainfed condition, M Sc (Agri.), University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka.
Rajnish S and Subhash C. 2011. Performance of basmati rice (Oryza sativa l.) based cropping systems under different modes of nutrient management. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81(4): 336–9.
Singh V and Singh J P. 1968. Effect of Bio-digester liquid manure on yield and quality of soybean (Glycine max). Madras Agriculture Journal 55(2): 129–33.
Somasundaram E. 2003. ‘Evaluation of organic sources of nutrients and Panchagavya spray on the growth and productivity of maize sunflower-greengram system.’ Ph D thesis, Tamil Nadu Agriculture University, Coimbatore.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.