Root growth, crop productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of dwarf pea (Pisum sativum) as influenced by integrated nutrient management
378 / 304
Keywords:
Biofertilizer, Dwarf pea, Micronutrient, NPK, VermicompostAbstract
A field experiment was conducted during the two consecutive rabi seasons of 2007-08 and 2008-09 at Varanasi on sandy loam soil to study the effect of organic, inorganic and biofertilizers on dwarf pea (Pisum sativum L.). The experiment was conducted in a split-plot design and replicated thrice. All the fertility levels, viz. chemical fertilizers, vermicompost and control were allotted to main plot and combinations of biofertilizers (Rizobium+Bacillus polymixa +Pseudomonas fluorescence) and Zn along with control were subjected to sub-plot. Results showed superimposition of 50% Norganic (recommended dose of N through vermicompost) to 100% NPK (recommended dose of NPK through chemical fertilizers) resulted in significant improvement of dry matter/plant, yield (grain and straw, harvest index), root growth (root dry weight, root N content and cation exchange capacity of root) and nutrient uptake (NPKS and Zn). However nodulation (root nodules/plant, dry weight of nodules/plant and nitrogenase activity at 30 and 60 DAS) was lesser with this fertility level but significantly higher than 100% NPK and control (no application).Gross and net returns (` 45 358 and 31 223/ha) were noted higher with 100% NPK + 50% Norganic fertility level. Benefit: cost ratio (2.21) was also recorded higher with 100% NPK + 50% Norganic level. The integrated application of biofertilizers and Zn was recorded significantly better than control as this treatment lucidly improved dry matter, yield, harvest index, root growth, nodulation and nutrient uptake. Benefit: cost ratio was also higher with combined application of PSB and Zn. Furthermore, integration of 100% NPK + 50% Norganic and biofertilizers + Zn was conducive for getting significantly optimum yield (1873 kg/ha).
Downloads
References
Jat R S and Ahlawat I P S. 2004. Effect of Vermicompost, biofertilizer and phophorus on growth, yield and nutrient uptake by gram (Cicer arietinum) and their residual effect on fodder maize (Zea mays). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 74 (7): 359–61.
Kachot N A, Malvia D D, Solanki R M and Sagarka B K. 2001. Integrated nutrient management in rainy season groundnut (Arachis hypogaea). Indian Journal of Agronomy 46 (3): 516–522.
Kasturikrishna S and Ahlawat I P S.2000. Effect of irrigation schedule and phosphorus on yield attributes and yield of field pea (Pisum sativum). Indian Journal of Agronomy 40 (1): 82– 5.
Krouma A and Abdelly C.2003.Importance of iron- use- efficiency of nodules in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) for iron deficiency chlorosis resistance. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 166 (4): 525–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200320251
Kumar S, Singh R C and Kadian V S.2003. Performance of mungbean as influenced by seed inoculation with Rhizobium & levels of organic and inorganic sources of nutrient. Indian Journal of pulses Research 16 (1): 67–6
Negi S, Dwivedi G K and Singh R V.2007. Intergrated nutrient management through biofertilizers, fertilizers, organic manures and lime for vegetable pea in an acid inseptisol of cool temperate region of Uttaranchal. Legume Research 30 (1): 37–40.
Prasad B 1999. Conjuntive use of fertilizers with organics, crop residue and green manuring for their efficient use in sustainable crop production. Fertilizer News 44 (5): 67–73.
Rajput R L and Kushwah S S 2005. Effect of integrated nutrient management on yield of pea (Pisum sativum). Legume Research 28 (3): 231–2.
Sen K C, Prasad S M and Sinha S P. 2005. Effect of plant population and nitrogen level on growth, yield and yield attributes of dwarf pea in north Bihar Journal of Applied Biology 15 (1): 25–7.
Shakya M S, Patel M M and Singh V B. 2008. Knowledge level of chickpea grower about chick pea production technology. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education 8: 65–8.
Shukla M D, Lal R and Onderfur P. 2003. Experimental evaluation infiltration models for different land uses. Soil Science 168: 178–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ss.0000058890.60072.7c
Singh R P, Gupta S C and Yadav A S. 2008. Effect of integrated nutrient management on yield of pea (Pisum sativum). Legume Research 28 (3): 231–2.
Srivastava T K and Ahlawat I P S.1995. Response of pea (Pisum sativum ) to phosphorus, molybdenum and biofertilizers. Indian Journal of Agronomy 40 (4): 630–5.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.