Design and development of three-row improved pull-type rice transplanter for small farmers

M MUTHAMIL SELVAN; S J K ANNAMALAI; N THAVAPRAKASH; D ANANATHAKRISHNAN

doi:10.56093/ijas.v84i11.44655

Authors

M MUTHAMIL SELVAN Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
S J K ANNAMALAI Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering - Regional Centre, Coimbatore 641 003
N THAVAPRAKASH Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
D ANANATHAKRISHNAN Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641 003, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v84i11.44655

Keywords:

Ergonomics, Rice transplanting, Seedlings, Transplanter

Abstract

A pull-type transplanter was developed by improvising the functional components of existing six-row manual IRRI rice transplanter. The improved transplanter is capable of planting seedlings in three rows at 250 mm row spacing. Picker mechanism was designed in such a way to perform the planting operation simultaneously as the equipment is being pulled with handle. Thus the push-pull mechanism adopted in the existing transplanter has been eliminated in this improved model, reducing drudgery of operation. While evaluating the unit in different puddling conditions as well as textural conditions, the field capacity was observed as 0.058 ha/h with field efficiency of 85.4% at the draft of 261.7 N. Percentage of missing hills was found as 9.61 with the optimized growing density of seedling of 60 g/mat. The ground wheel diameter was optimized as 500 mm based on intra-row spacing as well as force requirement for pulling the unit. The picker-finger width of 3 mm was optimized as there was high mortality rate observed with other fingers. For the optimized picker-finger width, single seedling was observed in 12.1% hills, double seedlings in 30.4% hills, triple seedlings in 31.7% hills, and 25.8% hills are planted with more than three seedlings. By employing ergonomic consideration in seedling picking mechanism, the energy requirement with improved transplanter was reduced to 19.84 kJ/min from 26.41 as in existing transplanter, and hence there was 24.9% reduction in drudgery. Although energy cost with improved transplanter is graded as ‘heavy’, the unit can be operated effectively with the recommended rest-pause of 12.5 min for every 45 min. Cost of transplanting with the equipment worked out ` 1 150 per ha with a cost-saving of 80.8% in addition to time-saving of 91.3% compared to hand transplanting. The improved transplanter has good scope for introduction in marginal farms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aberg U, Elgstrand A K, Magnus P, and Linholm M A. 1967. Analysis of components and prediction of energy expenditure in manual tasks. International Journal of Production Research, 6(3): 189–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207546708929779

Anonymous. 1979. Regional Network on Agricultural Machinery (RNAM), Rice Transplanter, Digest 1 April, 1979, RNAM, Bangkok, Thailand.

Annonymous. 1995. Regional Network on Agricultural Machinery (RNAM) Test codes and procedures for farm machinery, RNAM, Bangkok, Thailand.

Baqui M A, and Latin R M. 1982. Human energy expenditure in manually operated transplanters. Agriculture Mechanization in Asia, Africa, and Latin America 14(1): 14–6.

Curteon T K. 1947. Physical fitness appraisal and guidelines. CV Mosby Co., St. Louis, Mo.

Gite L P and Singh G. 1997. Ergonomics in agricultural and allied activities in India. Technical Bulletin, Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal, India

Vidhu K P. 2001. ‘An investigation on ergonomic evaluation of selected rice forming equipment’. M E Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.

Nag P K and Chatterjee S K. 1980. Physiological reactions of female workers in Indian agricultural work. Human Factors, 23: 607–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088102300510

Singh G, Sharma T R, Bockhop C W. 1982. Field performance evaluation of a manual rice transplanter, Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 32(3): 259–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8634(85)90083-6

Ben Tzion Karsh, Astrid C Newenhouse, Larry J Chapman. 2013. Barriers to the adoption of ergonomic innovations to control musculoskeletal disorders and improve performance. Applied Ergonomics 44 (1):161–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.06.007

Irina Rivilis, Dwayne Van Eerd, Kimberley Cullen, Donald C. Cole, Emma Irvin, Jonathan Tyson, Quenby Mahood. 2008. Effectiveness of participatory ergonomic interventions on health outcomes: A systematic review. Applied Ergonomics 39(3): 342–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2007.08.006

Fadi A Fathallah. 2010. Musculoskeletal disorders in labor- intensive agriculture. Applied Ergonomics 41(6): 738–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.03.003

Chiu Yi-Chich, Ya-Hui Chu, Gang-Jhy Wu. 2013. Development of an automatic tray-discharging system for rice seedlings. Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food 6(1): 27- 33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1881-8366(13)80014-6

Fu-Ming Lu. 2009. The Role of Agricultural Mechanization in the Modernization of Asian Agriculture: Taiwan’s Experience. Engineering in Ariculture., Environment and Food 2(4):124– 31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1881-8366(09)80003-7

Alex Keen, Nigel Hall, Peeyush Soni, Madhav D. Gholkar, Simon Cooper, Jannatul Ferdous. 2013. A review of the tractive performance of wheeled tractors and soil management in lowland intensive ric production. Journal of Terramechanics 50(1):45–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2012.08.001

Guo L S, Zhang W J. 2001. Kinematic analysis of a rice transplanting mechanism with eccentric planetary gear trains. Mechanism and Machine Theory 36(11-12):1 175–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-114X(01)00052-0