Effect of integrated nutrient management on productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of rainfed pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) and blackgram (Vigna mungo) intercropping system
497 / 51
Keywords:
Economics, Intercropping system, Integrated nutrition, Nutrient uptake, PEY, YieldsAbstract
Field experiments were carried out during kharif season of 2008-09 and 2009-10 to study the effect of integrated nutrition on productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of rainfed pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] and blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] intercropping system. Pooled data shows that intercropping systems did not influence significantly on the grain, stover, biological yield and harvest index of pigeonpea and blackgram. Total uptake of N, P, K, S and Zn by pigeonpea were highest recorded with the sole pigeonpea (S1) which was comparable to normal intercropping system (S2) and significantly superior over paired intercropping system (S3). Further, pooled data revealed that normal intercropping system (S2) gave maximum values of gross return (Rupees 120 050), net return (Rupees 99 396), B:C ratio (4.8), pigeonpea equivalent yield (21.75 q/ha), land equivalent ratio (1.70), production efficiency (7.98 kg/ha/day) and economic efficiency (364.83 Rupees/ha/day) which was at par with paired intercropping system (S3) and significantly superior to sole planting of pigeonpea (S1). Application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizers + 50% recommended dose of nitrogen (through vermicompost) + 5 kg Zn/ha gave significantly higher grain yield (21.05 and 5.23 q/ha), stover yield (82.19 and 14.47 q/ha), biological yield (103.24 and 18.85 q/ha) and harvest index (20.23 and 26.40%) of pigeonpea and blackgram, respectively. This treatment (F7) also gave the higher total uptake of N, P, K, S and Zn by pigeonpea and blackgram. Similarly, application of 100% RDF + 50% RDN + 5 kg Zn/ha (F7) recorded highest gross return (Rupees 130 735), net return (Rupees 109 277), B:C ratio (5.11), PEY (24.24 q/ha), LER (1.57), production efficiency (8.9 kg/ha/day) and economic efficiency (401.07 Rupees /ha/day) which was at par with 50% RDF + 100% RDN + 5 kg Zn/ha (F8) and significantly superior to rest of the treatments.Downloads
References
Anonymous. 2009. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, New Delhi.
Chaturvedi S, Chandel A S, Dhyani V C and Singh A P. 2010. Productivity, profitability and quality of soybean (Glycine max) and residual soil fertility as influenced by integrated nutrient management. Indian Journal of Agronomy 55 (2): 133–7.
Egbe O M and Kalu B A. 2009. Evaluation of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] genotypes for intercropping with tall sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) in Southern Guinea Savanna of Nigeria. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4(4): 54–65.
Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd Edition. A Willey Inter-Science Publication, New York, USA.
Goud V V and Kale H B. 2010. Productivity and profitability of pigeonpea under different source of nutrients in rainfed condition of Central India. Journal of Food Legumes 23(3&4): 212–7.
Kantwa S R, Ahlawat I P S and Gangaiah B. 2005. Effect of land configuration, post-monsoon irrigation and phosphorus on performance of sole and intercropped pigeonpea. Indian Journal of Agronomy 50(4): 278–80.
Kene D R, Sirsat M T, Thakare K K and Darange O G. 1990. Response of pigeonpea to higher level of fertilization and its effect on nodulation and nitrogen fixation. PKV Research Journal 14: 182–5.
Kumar A and Rana K S. 2007. Performance of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) + greengram (Phaseolus radiatus) intercropping system as influenced by moisture – conservation practices and fertility levels under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal Agronomy 52(1): 31–5.
Kumar P, Rana K S and Rana D S. 2012. Effect of planting systems and phosphorus with bio-fertilizers on the performance of sole and intercropped pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy 57 (2): 127– 32.
Kumari A, Singh, O N and Kumar R. 2012. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, seed yield and economics of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) and soil fertility changes. Journal of Food Legumes 25(2): 121–4.
Mead R and Willey R W. 1980. The concept of a land equivalent ratio and advantage in yields from intercropping. Experimental Agricultural 16: 217–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700010978
Rathod P S., Halikatti S I, Hiremath, S M and Kajjidoni S T. 2004. Comparative performance of pigeonpea based intercropping systems in Northern transitional zone of Karnataka. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 17: 203–6.
Sharma A, Rathod P S and Chavan M. 2010. Integrated nutrient management in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) based intercropping systems under rainfed conditions. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 23(4) : 584–9.
Sharma U and Chauhan J K. 2011. Influence of integrated use of inorganic and organic sources of nutrients on growth and production of pea. Journal of Farm Science 1(1): 14–8.
Singh R, Malik, J K, Thenua O V S and Jat H S. 2013. Effect of phosphorus and bio-fertilizer on productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) +mungbean (Phaseolus radiatus) intercropping system. Legume Research 36 (1) : 41–8.
Vasanthi D and Subramanian S. 2004. Effect of vermicompost on nutrient uptake and protein content in blackgram. Legume Research 27(4): 293–5.
Willey RW. 1979. Intercropping its importance and research needs. Field Crop Abstract 32 : 1–10, 73–85.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.