Effect of conservation agriculture practices on productivity and sustainability of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system in Indo-Gangetic plains of India


456 / 41

Authors

  • SEEMA SEPAT Scientist, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
  • A R SHARMA Director, DWSR, Jabalpur, MP 482 004
  • DINESH KUMAR Principal Scientist, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
  • T K DAS Principal Scientist, Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i2.46500

Keywords:

Pigeonpea, Residue, System productivity, Sustainable yield index, Wheat equivalent yield, Zero-tillage

Abstract

A long term field experiment was conducted at Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi during 2008-09 to 2011-12 on a sandy loam soil to study the effect of tillage and crop establishment techniques, and residue management practices on pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) - wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cropping system. Results indicated that zero tillage-raised bed (ZT-B), zero tillage-flat bed (ZT-F) and conventional tillage-raised bed (CT-B) influenced pods/plant, spikes/m2 and grains/spike in pigeonpea and wheat crop. Grain yield of pigeonpea and wheat in zero tillage was 5.4 and 2.47 % higher over conventional tillage, respectively. ZT-F had higher system productivity, net returns and benefit:cost ratio, but ZT-B had higher wheat equivalent yield (WEY). Among all the practices, system yield and net returns were lowest in conventional tillage-flat bed (CT-F). Application of residue gave 14.32 and 34.39 % higher pigeonpea and wheat grain yield, respectively, over the no residue. System productivity, WEY and sustainable yield index (SYI) also increased in combined use of pigeonpea+wheat residue @ 3 tonnes/ha over no residue application. Zero tillage with combined application of residue @ 3 tonnes/ha improved productivity and sustainability of the system. Similar net returns were gained with pigeonpea + wheat residue @ 3 tonnes/ha (Rupees 84,500) and sole pigeonpea residue @ 3 tonnes/ha (Rupees 84 200) application, but net B:C ratio was higher with pigeonpea residue @ 3 tonnes/ha (2.68) than pigeonpea + wheat residue @ 3 tonnes/ha (2.55) application.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chauhan Y S, Apphum A, Singh V K and Dwivedi B S. 2004. Foliar sprays of concentrated urea at maturity of pigeonpea to induce defoliation and increase its residual benefit to wheat. Field Crop Research 89 (1): 17–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.01.016

FAO. 2013. FAO CA website at: www.fao.org/ag/ca (accessed 15 March 2013).

Gathala M K, Ladha J K, Kumar V, Saharawat Y S, Kumar V, Sharma P K, Sharma S and Pathak H. 2011. Tillage and crop establishment affects sustainability of South Asian rice-wheat system. Agronomy Journal 103: 961–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2010.0394

Gnagaiah B, Ahlawat I P S and Shivakumar B G. 2012. Crop rotation and residue recycling effects of legumes on wheat as influenced by nitrogen fertilization. Agricultural Science Research Journal 2(4):167–76.

Govaerts B, Sayre K D, Ceballos-Ramiresz J M, Limon-Ortega A, Deckers J, Denodooven L. 2006. Conventionally tilled and permanent raised beds with different crop residue management: effects on soil C and N dynamics. Plant and Soil 2980:143–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-2854-7

Jat M L, Gathala M K, Saharawat Y S, Tetarwal J P, Gupta R and Singh Y. 2013. Double no-till and permanent raised beds in maize–wheat rotation of north-western Indo-Gangetic plains of India: Effects on crop yields,water productivity, profitability and soil physical properties. Field Crop Research 149: 291–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.04.024

Ladha J K, Fischer K S, Hossain M, Hobbs P R, Hardy B. 2000. Improving the productivity and sustainability of rice-wheat systems of the Indo-Gangetic Plains: A synthesis of NARSIRRI partnership research. IRRI discussion paper no. 40, 31.

Limon-Ortega A, Sayre K D and Francis C A. 2000. Wheat nitrogen use efficiency in a bed planting system in Northwest Mexico. Agronomy Journal 92: 303–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.922303x

Nyborg M, Solberg E D, Izaurralde R C, Malhi S S, Molina-Ayala M. 1995. Influence of long term tillage, straw and N fertilizer on barley yield, plant-N uptake and soil-N balance. Soil and Tillage Research 36:165–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(95)00502-1

Prasad R, Shivay Y S, Kumar D and Sharma S N. 2006. Learning by doing exercises in soil fertility (A practical manual for soil fertility). Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute. New Delhi.

Kassam A H, Friedrich T, Derpsch R. 2010. Conservation agriculture in the 21st century: A paradigm of sustainable agriculture. Invited paper at the European Congress on Conservation Agriculture, October 2010, Madrid, Spain.

Saharawat Y S, Singh R K, Malik J K, Ladha M, Gathala M K and Kumar V. 2010. Evaluation of alternative tillage and crop establishment methods in a rice-wheat rotation in north-western IGP. Field Crops Research. 116: 260–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.01.003

Shivran D R and Ahlawat I P S. 2005. Effect of cropping systems and fertilizers on pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) in pigeonpea-wheat sequence. Indian Journal of Agronomy 45(4): 669–75.

Singh R P, Das S K, Rao U M B and Reddy M N. 1990. CRIDA Report, CRIDA, Hyderabad, India, 106 p.

Singh V K and Dwivedi B S. 2006. Yield and nutrient use efficiency in wheat, and soil fertility status as influenced by substitution of rice with pigeonpea in a rice-wheat cropping system. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46:1 185–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/EA04046

Downloads

Submitted

2015-02-12

Published

2015-02-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SEPAT, S., SHARMA, A. R., KUMAR, D., & DAS, T. K. (2015). Effect of conservation agriculture practices on productivity and sustainability of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system in Indo-Gangetic plains of India. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 85(2), 212-216. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i2.46500
Citation