Characterization and analysis of genetic diversity among different species of rose (Rosa species) using morphological and molecular markers

HENUKA RAI; D V S RAJU; ARUN KUMAR M B; T JANAKIRAM; NAMITA NAMITA; S GOPALA KRISHNAN; J C RANA

doi:10.56093/ijas.v85i2.46518

Authors

HENUKA RAI Ph D Student, Indian Institute of Maize Research, New Delhi 110 012
D V S RAJU Senior Scientist, Division of Floriculture and Landscaping, Indian Institute of Maize Research, New Delhi 110 012
ARUN KUMAR M B Senior scientist, Division of Seed Science and Technology, Indian Institute of Maize Research, New Delhi 110 012
T JANAKIRAM ADG, Horticulture, KAB II, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012
NAMITA NAMITA Scientist, Division of Floriculture and Landscaping, Indian Institute of Maize Research, New Delhi 110 012
S GOPALA KRISHNAN Senior scientist, Division of Genetics, Indian Institute of Maize Research, New Delhi 110 012
J C RANA Office Incharge, NBPGR Regional Station, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh 171 004

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i2.46518

Keywords:

Cluster analysis, Random Amplified Polymorphic (RAPD) DNA, Rosa species

Abstract

The present studies were undertaken to find out genetic diversity among twenty three genotypes of rose (Rosa species) using morphological and Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Morphological characterization was done for 16 different morphological traits and genetic diversity of rose species based on morphological characters was determined using Jaccard’s pair wise similarity coefficient. R.damascena var. Rani Sahiba and R. moschata showed highest diversity. Molecular characterization was carried out using 50 random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) primers, out of which 26 produced 168 polymorphic fragments. Analysis of genetic similarity based on Jaccard’s pair wise similarity coefficient showed that R. moschata and R. tomentosa has the highest similarity. There was good concurrence between morphological and molecular characterization with considerable diversity in R. damascena. R. damascena var. Rani Sahiba and R. damascena var. Himroz have shown divergence from R. damascena var. Jwala. The members of the Section Indicae; R. indica var. odorata, R. indica major, R. chinensis viridiflora and R. bourboniana were also grouped together by molecular characterization. Kakinada rose, a local variety of South India was found to cluster with R. damascena var. Himroz through both morphological and molecular characterization. Both morphological and molecular analysis showed a high degree of variation in the rose germplasm which is an invaluable source of genetic diversity for rose improvement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Doyle J J and Doyle J L. 1990. A rapid total DNA preparation procedure for fresh plant tissue. Focus 12: 13–5.

Gudin S. 2000. Rose: genetics and breeding. Plant Breeding Review 17: 59–68.

Kim Y. 1994. ‘A study of selected species of Rosa using isozyme polymorphisms’. M Sc thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.

Kim Y and Byrne D H. 1994. Biosystematical classification of genus Rosa using isozyme polymorphism. Horticulture Science 29: 483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.29.5.483c

Kim Y and Byrne D H. 1996. Interspecific hybrid verification of Rosa with isozymes. Horticulture Science 31: 1 207–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.31.7.1207

Kuhns L J and Fretz T A. 1978. Distinguishing rose cultivars by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. I. Isozyme variation among cultivars. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 103: 509–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.103.4.509

Lee J S and Kim Y R. 1982. Genetic studies on natural populations of Rosa multiflora Thunb. by isozyme and multivariate analyses (Korean). Journal of Korean Society Horticultural Science 23: 141–62.

Lewis W H. 1957. Revision of the genus Rosa in Eastern North America: A review. American Rose Annual 42: 116–26.

Lynch M and Walsh J B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits, p 980. Sinaure Assocs. Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.

Mikanagi Y, Yokoi M, Ueda Y and Saito N. 1993. Flower flavonol and anthocyanin distribution in subg. Rosa. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 23: 183–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-1978(95)93849-X

Moreno M T, Torres A M, Millan T, Armada T and Cubero J I. 1996. Use of molecular markers in taxonomic studies of Rosa spp. Acta Horticulturae 424:293–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1996.424.52

Nybom H, Esselink G and Werlemark G. 2004. Microsattelite DNA marker inheritance indicates preferential pairing between two highly homologous genomes in polyploidy and hemisexual dog roses, Rosa L. Heredity (Edinb) 92: 139–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800332

Powell W, Morgante M, Chaz A, Hanafey M, Vogel J, Tingey S and Antoni R. 1996. The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Molecular Breeding 2: 225–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00564200

Prevost A and Wilkinson M J. 1999. A new system of comparing PCR primer applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98: 107–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051046

Quest Ritson C and Quest Ritson B. 2003. The American Rose Society Encyclopedia of Roses, p 44. D K Publishing Inc., New York.

Rehder A. 1940. Manual of Cultivated Trees and Shrubs. MacMillan, New York.

Rohlf F J. 2000. NTSYS-pc Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2.1 Manual. Applied Biostatistics, Inc., New York.

Walker C A and Werner D J. 1997. Isozyme and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analyses of Cherokee rose and its putative hybrids ‘Silver Moon’ and ‘Anemone’. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 122: 659–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.122.5.659

Williams J G K , Kubelik A R, Livak K J, Rafalski J A and Tingey S V. 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Research 18: 6 531–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/18.22.6531

Wissemann V. 2003.Conventional taxonomy (wild roses). (In) Encyclopedia of Rose Science. pp 111–7. Robert A, Debener T and Gudin S (Eds). Elsevier, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-227620-5/00019-7

Zhang D and Gandelin M H. 2003. Cultivar identification by image analysis. (In) Encyclopedia of Rose Science, pp 124- 1 351. Elsevier Ltd, Oxford, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-227620-5/00025-2