Enhanced root traits and productivity of maize (Zea mays) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) in maize - wheat cropping system through integrated potassium management
281 / 44
Keywords:
Farmyard manure, Root length density, Root surface area density, Root volume density, Root dry weight, YieldAbstract
A field experiment was conducted during the kharif and rabi seasons of 2010-11 and 2011-12 at Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi to find out the performance of maize (Zea mays L.) - wheat (Triticum aestvum L.) cropping system with potassium (K) fertilization through muriate of potash and farmyard manure. Ten treatments were evaluated in randomized block design with three replications. All the treatment with potassium irrespective of sources showed significant increase in grain yield. Application of 60 kg K through muriate of potash + 30 kg K through farmyard manure produced highest grain yield of maize (4.44 and 5.42 tonnes/ha) and wheat (5.39 and 5.49 tonnes/ha), which was significantly superior over grain yield of maize (2.21 and 2.72 tonnes/ha) and wheat (3.80 and 3.89 tonnes/ha) as obtained from control during both the years. Application of K showed better root growth over no K application. In maize, application of 90 kg K/ha, supplemented 60 kg K/ha through MOP and 30 kg K/ha through farmyard manure (FYM) recorded highest root length density (4.51 and 4.33 cm/cm3), surface area density (1.31 and 1.11 cm2/ cm3) root volume density (30.5 and 28.6 cm3/cm3) and dry weight (9.0 and 10.1 g/plant). Similarly, in wheat the same treatment also recorded highest root length density (2.7 and 3.03 cm/cm3), surface area density (0.60 and 0.64 cm2/ cm3), root volume density (12.52 and 16.9 cm3/cm3) and dry weight (2.43 and 2.84 g /plant) during both the years.
Downloads
References
Bednarz C W and Oosterhuis D M. 1999. Physiological changes associated with potassium deficiency in cotton. Journal of Plant Nutrition 22: 303–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169909365628
Costa C, Dwyer L M, Hamilton R I, Hamel C, Nantais L, Smith D. 2000. A sampling method for measurement of large root systems with scanner-based image analysis. Agronomy Journal 92: 621–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.924621x
Eldardiry I E, El Hady M A and El Ashry S M. 2010. Effect of water regime and potassium application on water relations and nutrients uptake of wheat plant. International Journal of Academic Research 2 (2): 75–82.
Gomez A K and Gomez A A.1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Høgh-Jensen H H and Pedersen, M.B. 2003. Morphological plasticity by crop plants and their potassium use efficiency. Journal of Plant Nutrition 26(5):969–84. [doi:10.1081/PLN- 120020069] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-120020069
Jia Y, Yang X, Feng Y and Jilani G. 2008. Differential response of root morphology to potassium deficient stress among rice genotypes varying in potassium efficiency. Journal of Zhejiang University of Science B 9(5):427–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B0710636
Lynch J P, Lynch A F, Jonathan P. 2007. Roots of the second green revolution. Australian Journal of Botany 55(5):493–512. [doi:10.1071/BT06118] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/BT06118
Mumtaz A, Cheema M, Iqbal Z A, Cheema B U, Rafique M. 1999. Response of hybrid maize to potassium. International Journal of Agricultural Biology 4(1): 267–9.
Nejad S D, Nejad T S and Lack S. 2010. Study effect drought stress and different levels of potassium fertilizer on K+ accumulation in corn. Nature Science 8 (5): 23–7.
Pettigrew W T. 1999. Potassium deficiency increases specific leaf weights and leaf glucose levels in field grown cotton. Agronomy Journal 91: 962–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1999.916962x
Pettigrew W T. 2008. Potassium influences on yield and quality production for maize, wheat, soybean and cotton. Plant Physiology 133: 670–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01073.x
Polara K B, Sardhara R V, Parmar K B, Babariya N B and Patel K G. 2010. Effect of potassium on inflow rate of N, P, K, Ca, S, Fe, Zn and Mn at various growth stages of wheat. An Asian Journal of Soil Science 4 (2): 228–35.
Rehman S, Khalil S K, Rehman A and Saljoqi A U R. 2008. Organic and inorganic fertilizers increase wheat yield components and biomass under rainfed condition. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 24 (1): 11–20.
Rengel Z and Marschner P. 2005. Nutrient availability and management in the rhizosphere: exploiting genotypic differences. New Phytologist 168(2):305–12. [doi:10.1111/ j.1469-8137.2005.01558.x] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01558.x
Roshani G A and Narayanasamy G. 2010. Effects of potassium on temporal growth of root and shoot of wheat and its uptake in different soils. International Journal of Plant Production 4 (1): 25–32.
Sharma S P and Subehia S K. 2003. Effects of twenty-five years of fertilizer use on maize and wheat yields and quality of an acidic soil in the western Himalayas. Experimental Agriculture 39: 55–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479702001035
Tabatabaii E S, Yarnia M, Benam M B K and Tabrizi E F M. 2011. Effect of potassium fertilizer on corn yield (jeta cv.) under drought stress condition. American- Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environment Science 10 (2): 257–63.
Wolf T, Heidelmann T and Marten I. 2006. ABA regulation of K -permeable channels in maize subsidiary cells. Plant Cell Physiology 47: 1 372–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcl007
Xie Y H, An SQ, Wu B F and Wang W W. 2006. Densitydependent root morphology and root distribution in the submerged plant Vallisneria natans. Environment and Experimental Botany 57(1-2):195–200. [doi:10.1016/ j.envexpbot.2005. 06.001] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.06.001
Yang X E, Li H, Kirk G J D and Dobbermann A. 2005. Roominduced changes of potassium in the rhizosphere of lowland rice. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 36(13):1 947–63. [doi:10.1081/CSS-200062529] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-200062529
Zhao D, Oosterhuis D M and Bednarz C W. 2001. Influence of potassium deficiency on photosynthesis, chlorophyll content, and chloroplast ultra structure of cotton plants. Photosynthetica 39: 103–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012404204910
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.