Attitude of farmers towards grape cultivation and export
474 / 87
Keywords:
Attitude, Grape cultivation, Grape export, MahagrapesAbstract
Adoption behavior of farmers is affected by the attitude they possess for particular technology. Many grape growers became successful exporters by associating themselves to Mahagrapes, necessitating need to study their attitude scientifically and empirically. Study of 90 grape growers who were members of cooperatives linked to Mahagrapes, from Nashik, Sangli and Pune districts of Maharashtra found that members had long association with Mahagrapes with average of 15 years. They earned average Rupees 13.3 lakh per annum by exporting their produce. Average land holding was 10 acres and productivity of grapes obtained was 11.7 tonnes/acre. Farmers had more favourable attitude towards grapes cultivation as result of their association with Mahagrapes. Total annual income, risk taking behavior and achievement motivation of members were positively and significantly related to attitude towards grape cultivation and export. Thus, study implied that farmer's organization like Mahagrapes helped in developing positive attitude among farmers towards grape cultivation and export, motivating them to earn more income annually by exporting their produce.
Downloads
References
Bhalla G S and Singh, Gurmail. 2012. Economic liberalisation and Indian agriculture: a district-level study, pp 361. SAGE Publication India Ltd, New Delhi.
Calkins P and Ngo A T. 2005. Impacts of cocoa cooperatives on well-being society for cooperation and International development, Québec, Canada.
Chand R, Prasanna P A L and Singh A. 2011. Farm size and productivity: Understanding the strengths of smallholders and improving their livelihoods, Economic and Political Weekly 46(26 & 27).
GOM. 2014. Government of Maharashtra, Department of Agriculture, Agro Climatic Zones in Maharashtra [Internet]. [cited 2014 Dec 10]. Available from: http:// http://www.mahaagri.gov.in/CropWeather/AgroClimaticZone.html.
Hegde Narayan G. 2010. Small holders and role of NGOs in improving their livelihood. Paper presented at the NAARM workshop, Hyderabad, Sept 2010.
Herlehy T. 2012. Linking smallholder farmers to markets: the power of farmer-based organizations. Global Food for Thought, Global Agriculture Development Initiatives. Guest Commentary, Global Food for Thought Blog, Oct 5.
Indian Horticulture Database. 2012. National Horticulture Board, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi. Kerlinger E N. 1978. Foundation of Behavioral Research, pp 741. Surjeet Publication, Delhi.
Kumaresan P and Vijayaprakash N B. 2001. Economics of sericulture vis-à-vis competing crops in Erode district of Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Sericulture 40(2): 142–6.
Narrod C and Roy D. 2006. The role of public-private partnerships and collective action in ensuring smallholder participation in high value fruit and vegetable supply chains. CAPRi Working Paper No.70, October 2007.
Patil A. 2011. ‘A study on constraints analysis of grape exporting farmers of Maharashtra state.’ Ph D thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad.
Roy D and Thorat A. 2008. Success in high value horticultural export markets for the small farmers: the case of Mahagrapes in India. World Development 36(10): 1 874–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.09.009
Shashi. 1986. A study on acceptance of mulberry sericulture by farm families in Udaipur region. M Sc thesis, Sukhadua University, Udaipur.
Shikhamany S D. 2001. Grape production in India. (In) Grape Production in the Asia-Pacific Region, pp 28-38. Minas K Papademetriou and Frank J Dent (Eds). FAO Regional Office for Asia and The Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand, July 2001.
Shukla R and Sharma O P. 2011. A study on attitude of farmers towards mulberry sericulture in Udaipur district of Rajasthan. Agricultural Science Digest 31(1): 66–9.
Singh R K Turner N J and Pandey C B. 2011. Tinni rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.) production: an integrated sociocultural agroecosystem in eastern Uttar Pradesh of India. Environmental Management 49: 26–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9755-8
Thruston L L. 1946. Comment. American Journal of Sociology 52: 39–50.
Working Group Report. 2007. Agricultural marketing infrastructure and policy required for internal and external trade. Agriculture Division, Planning Commission, Government Of India.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.