Response of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) cultivars to weed competition in semi-arid tropical India
363 / 114
Keywords:
Economics, Grain sorghum cultivars, Weed competition, Weed dry weight, Weeding levelsAbstract
The performance of eleven grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] cultivars on weed competition was evaluated in the semi-arid tropics of India during rainy seasons of 2009 and 2010 at Hyderabad. The experiment consisted of the three weeding levels (unweeded check, atrazine 0.50 kg/ha + hoeing once at 30 days after sowing- DAS, and atrazine + hoeing twice at 30 and 45 DAS) as the main plot treatments and eleven grain sorghum cultivars (CSH 16, CSH 23, CSH 14, SPH 1596, SPH 1606, SPH 1616, CSV 15, CSV 17, CSV 20, CSV 23, SPV 462) as the sub plots, was replicated thrice in a split-plot design. The cultivar competitiveness was associated with its ability to intercept solar radiation. Sorghum leaf area index (LAI) was negatively correlated (r = –0.82**) with a light transmission ratio (LTR) and weed dry weight at harvest (r = –0.81**). The yield reduction due to weed competition among cultivars varied from 21 to 53%. Grain yield was significantly and positively correlated with initial fresh shoot weight (r = 0.61*), LAI (r= 0.84**), panicle number (r = 0.68**), and significantly negatively correlated with weed biomass (r = –0.62*) and LTR (r = –0.77**). Sorghum hybrids CSH 16 resulted in better weed suppression, whereas CSH 14, SPH 1616 and SPH 1606 tolerated higher weed pressure. CSH 16 (unweeded and weeded once), and SPH 1596 (weeded twice) were the most profitable. Results showed that growing sorghum hybrid CSH 16 and controlling weeds with atrazine at 0.50 kg/ha as pre-emergence followed by 1 hoe weeding at 30 DAS would lead to higher yield and profits.
Downloads
References
Dan H A, Dan L G M, Barrosa A L L, Oliveira J R R S, Alonso D G and Finotti T R. 2011a. Influência do estádio de desenvolvimento de Cenchrus echinatus na supressão imposta por atrazine (Effect of the growth stage of Cenchrus echinatus on weed suppression imposed by atrazine). Planta Daninha 29: 179–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582011000100020
Geier P W, Stahlman P W, Regehr D L and Olson B L. 2009. Preemergence herbicide efficacy and phytotoxicity in grain sorghum. Weed Technology 23, 197–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-08-125.1
Jannik J L, Orf J H, Jordan N R and Shaw R G. 2000. Index selection for weed suppressive ability in soybean. Crop Science 40, 1 087–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.4041087x
Mishra J S. 1997. Critical period of weed competition and losses due to weeds in major field crops. Farmers and Parliament 33: 19–20.
Rizzardi M A, Karam D and Cruz M B. 2004 . Manejo e controle de plantas daninhas em milho e sorgo. (In) Manual de Manejo e Controle de Plantas Daninhas. Bento Gonçalves: Embrapa Uva e Vinho, pp 571–94. Vargas L and Oman E S (Eds).
Tamado T, Ohlander L and Milberg P. 2002. Interference by the weed Parthenium hysterophorus L. with grain sorghum: influence of weed density and duration of competition. International Journal of Pest Management 48: 183–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09670870110101739
Traore S, Manson S C, Martin A R, Mortensen D A and Spotansk J J. 2003. Velvetleaf interference effects on yield and growth of grain sorghum. Agronomy Journal 95: 1 602–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.1602
Yoshida S, Forno D D, Cock J H and Gomez K A. 1972. Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines, pp 67–8.
Zhao D L, Altin G N, Bastiaans L and Spiertz J H J 2006. Cultivar weed-competitiveness in aerobic rice: heritability, correlated traits and the potential for indirect selection in the weed-free environment. Crop Science 46: 372–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.0192
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.