Response of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) cultivars to weed competition in semi-arid tropical India


363 / 114

Authors

  • J S MISHRA Head, Division of Crop Research, ICAR-RCER, Patna, Bihar 800 014
  • S S RAO Principal Scientist (Plant Physiology), Directorate of Sorghum Research, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030
  • J V PATIL Director, Directorate of Sorghum Research, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i5.48507

Keywords:

Economics, Grain sorghum cultivars, Weed competition, Weed dry weight, Weeding levels

Abstract

The performance of eleven grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] cultivars on weed competition was evaluated in the semi-arid tropics of India during rainy seasons of 2009 and 2010 at Hyderabad. The experiment consisted of the three weeding levels (unweeded check, atrazine 0.50 kg/ha + hoeing once at 30 days after sowing- DAS, and atrazine + hoeing twice at 30 and 45 DAS) as the main plot treatments and eleven grain sorghum cultivars (CSH 16, CSH 23, CSH 14, SPH 1596, SPH 1606, SPH 1616, CSV 15, CSV 17, CSV 20, CSV 23, SPV 462) as the sub plots, was replicated thrice in a split-plot design. The cultivar competitiveness was associated with its ability to intercept solar radiation. Sorghum leaf area index (LAI) was negatively correlated (r = –0.82**) with a light transmission ratio (LTR) and weed dry weight at harvest (r = –0.81**). The yield reduction due to weed competition among cultivars varied from 21 to 53%. Grain yield was significantly and positively correlated with initial fresh shoot weight (r = 0.61*), LAI (r= 0.84**), panicle number (r = 0.68**), and significantly negatively correlated with weed biomass (r = –0.62*) and LTR (r = –0.77**). Sorghum hybrids CSH 16 resulted in better weed suppression, whereas CSH 14, SPH 1616 and SPH 1606 tolerated higher weed pressure. CSH 16 (unweeded and weeded once), and SPH 1596 (weeded twice) were the most profitable. Results showed that growing sorghum hybrid CSH 16 and controlling weeds with atrazine at 0.50 kg/ha as pre-emergence followed by 1 hoe weeding at 30 DAS would lead to higher yield and profits.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dan H A, Dan L G M, Barrosa A L L, Oliveira J R R S, Alonso D G and Finotti T R. 2011a. Influência do estádio de desenvolvimento de Cenchrus echinatus na supressão imposta por atrazine (Effect of the growth stage of Cenchrus echinatus on weed suppression imposed by atrazine). Planta Daninha 29: 179–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582011000100020

Geier P W, Stahlman P W, Regehr D L and Olson B L. 2009. Preemergence herbicide efficacy and phytotoxicity in grain sorghum. Weed Technology 23, 197–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-08-125.1

Jannik J L, Orf J H, Jordan N R and Shaw R G. 2000. Index selection for weed suppressive ability in soybean. Crop Science 40, 1 087–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.4041087x

Mishra J S. 1997. Critical period of weed competition and losses due to weeds in major field crops. Farmers and Parliament 33: 19–20.

Rizzardi M A, Karam D and Cruz M B. 2004 . Manejo e controle de plantas daninhas em milho e sorgo. (In) Manual de Manejo e Controle de Plantas Daninhas. Bento Gonçalves: Embrapa Uva e Vinho, pp 571–94. Vargas L and Oman E S (Eds).

Tamado T, Ohlander L and Milberg P. 2002. Interference by the weed Parthenium hysterophorus L. with grain sorghum: influence of weed density and duration of competition. International Journal of Pest Management 48: 183–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09670870110101739

Traore S, Manson S C, Martin A R, Mortensen D A and Spotansk J J. 2003. Velvetleaf interference effects on yield and growth of grain sorghum. Agronomy Journal 95: 1 602–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.1602

Yoshida S, Forno D D, Cock J H and Gomez K A. 1972. Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines, pp 67–8.

Zhao D L, Altin G N, Bastiaans L and Spiertz J H J 2006. Cultivar weed-competitiveness in aerobic rice: heritability, correlated traits and the potential for indirect selection in the weed-free environment. Crop Science 46: 372–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.0192

Downloads

Submitted

2015-05-13

Published

2015-05-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

MISHRA, J. S., RAO, S. S., & PATIL, J. V. (2015). Response of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) cultivars to weed competition in semi-arid tropical India. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 85(5), 688-694. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i5.48507
Citation