Impact of GDD on phenology of mango (Mangifera indica)


314 / 157

Authors

  • DILIP KANZARIA Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh, Gujarat 362 001
  • RAVJI CHOVATIA Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh, Gujarat 362 001
  • NITESH POLARA Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh, Gujarat 362 001
  • DEVSHI VARU Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh, Gujarat 362 001

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i8.50887

Keywords:

Flowering, Fruit set, GDD, Location, Mango, Variety

Abstract

The present investigation was undertaken to see the influence of Heat Units on the phenological changes in mango (Mangifera indica L.) cultivars under South Saurashtra agro-climatic conditions at Department of Horticulture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh during year 2012-13 and 2013-14. The treatments were comprised of three locations, viz. Junagadh (L1), Talala (L2) and Dhari (L3) and three commercial important mango varieties, viz. Kesar (V1), Alphonso (V2) and Rajapuri (V3). The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with Factorial concept (FRBD) and replicated four times. Significantly the minimum days for bud differentiation (166.46 days with 1402.94 GDD), early flower initiation (73.04 days with 420.36 GDD) and short flowering span (60.42 days with 444.69 GDD) was observed at Talala location. Among the varieties, early flower initiation (75.83 days and 381.04 GDD) and compact flowering span (60.63 days with 382.84 GDD) was observed in Kesar. The minimum days for fruit set (24.33 with 131.61 GDD), pea stage (20.63 with 173.10 GDD), marble stage (42.96 days and 446.48 GDD), egg stage (69.17 days and 809.13 GDD) and maturity (93.75 days with 1272.06 GDD) were rerecorded at Talala location, whereas early fruit set (24.00 days with 100.63 GDD), pea stage (20.83 days with 144.47 GDD), marble stage (43.67 days and 361.66 GDD), egg stage (70.54 days and 694.79 GDD) and maturity (95.88 days and 1062.71 GDD) was also noted in Kesar. The highest fruit set at pea (13.84%), marble (1.57%), egg stage (0.31%) and fruit retention (1.39%) were recorded at Talala. Among the varieties, the maximum fruit set at pea stage (13.84%) was recorded in Alphonso, while it was the maximum at marble (1.60%), egg stage (0.32%) and fruit retention (1.32%) in Kesar. However, the maximum numbers of fruits/tree were recorded at Talala location (335.21) in Alphonso variety (344.33).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Byrne D H and Bacon T. 1992. Chilling estimation: its importance and estimation. Texas Horticulturist 18(8-5): 8–9.

Majumder M and Sharma B K. 1990. http://www.assignmentpoint. com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/mango.png.

Malte G R. 2011. ‘Premature fruit drop in mango (Mangifera indica L.) in Northern Vietnam’. M Sc (Agri) thesis, University of Hohenheim.

Mathieu L, Michel G, Francoise L, Urban L and Magalie J. 2006. Modeling effects of weather and source–sink relationships on mango fruit growth. Tree Physiology. 25: 583–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/25.5.583

Oppenheimer C. 1947. The acclimatization of new tropical and subtropical fruits in Palestine. Bull 14, Agricultural Research station, Rehovoth, Palestine.

Polito V S. 2009. Dormancy and flowering in tree-crop species. UC Davis Plant Species.

Rajan S. 2008. Geographical information system (GIS): Role in characterization of climatic requirements for fruit crops. (In) Recent Initiatives in Horticulture, pp 669–77. Chadha K L, Singh A K and Patel V B (Eds). The Horticultural Society of India, New Delhi.

Ravi K, Sharma R M and Kher R. 2002. Performance of some mango cultivars under sub-tropical rainfed region of Jammu. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Science 31(1-2): 8–10.

Rodrigo J and Herrero M. 2002. Effects of pre-blossom temperatures on flower development and fruit set in apricot. Scientia Horticulturae 92: 125–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(01)00289-8

Sikhamany S D. 2005. Production, post harvest management and marketing of fresh mangoes for export. CyTA Journal of Food Science 9(3): 192–9.

Thomas H, Thomas H M and Ougham H. 2000. Annuality, perenniality and cell death. Journal of Experimental Botany 51: 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.352.1781

Uddin M Z and Amin M A. 1995. Effect of irrigation on the yield and quality of mango var. Aswina. A Research on Mango Improvement, RHRS, BARI, Nawabgonj, pp 56.

Downloads

Submitted

2015-08-07

Published

2015-08-07

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KANZARIA, D., CHOVATIA, R., POLARA, N., & VARU, D. (2015). Impact of GDD on phenology of mango (Mangifera indica). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 85(8), 1114-1117. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i8.50887
Citation