Farmers' producer organisation in reducing transactional costs: A study of Tamil Nadu Mango Growers Federation (TAMAFED)


518 / 77

Authors

  • SAKTHI PARTHIBAN R Ph D Scholar, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
  • M S NAIN Senior Scientist, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
  • RASHMI SINGH Principal Scientist, Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi 110 012
  • SHIV KUMAR Principal Scientist, IP&TM Unit, KAB-1, ICAR, New Delhi 110 012
  • V P CHAHAL Principal Scientist (Agricultural. Extension), KAB-I, ICAR, New Delhi 110 012

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i10.52269

Keywords:

Economic gains, Logit analysis, Marketing, Motivating factors, Transactional costs

Abstract

The functional linkages of producers with different systems and within the system in the form of backward and forward linkages in production process involve the investments in the form of transactional costs. Farmers’ collective action for better production in the form of self help groups (SHGs), farmers’ interest groups (FIGs), marketing associations, producers associations, co-operatives etc. have contributed in maximizing the input-output ratio and ultimately increasing the benefit of producers. The present study was undertaken to find out the motivating factors to join association and the benefits accrued as a result of joining such producers’ federation namely TAMAFED (Tamil Nadu Mango Growers Federation) dealing with mango crop in Tamil Nadu state of India. A set of sixty member and sixty non-member farmers were selected from the six villages of the three districts of the state. The Logit analysis revealed that education, economic benefit and area under mango cultivation were the major determinants of motivation to join TAMAFED. As a measure of economic gain, transactional output cost due to sale of harvested produce was two and half times less for members compared to non-members. The comparative analysis shows that mean transactional input cost per hectare was found to be significantly lower for members than non-members. The members of TAMAFED gained social and economic benefits and the costs incurred on input and output transactions were quite low ultimately adding to the benefit. As such, it may be recommended that organization of farmers on commodity basis in the form of similar federations may be promoted for socio economic gain of the farmers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldrich J H and Nelson F D. 1986. Linear probability, Logit and Probit Models, 3rd edition. Sage Publications, Baverly Hills, CA. Amini M and Khayatei M. 2006. The affecting factors on unsuccess formation of water users cooperatives (Using fuzzy regression), Agricultural Economic and Development 14(53).

Anderson J R. 2007. Agricultural advisory services: a background paper for innovating through science and technology.

Agricultural and Rural Development Department, World Bank, Wanshington DC.

Bhagyalaxmi K, Gopalkrishna Rao V and Reddy M S. 2003. Profile of the rural women micro entrepreneurs. ANGRAU Journal of Research 31(4) : 51–4.

Das L, Nain M S, Singh R and Burman R R. 2015. Effectivenes of backward and forword lingage in fruit cultivation: A study of NERAMAC. Indian Jourual of Extension Education 51(1&2): 70–4.

Govindagowda V. 2002. ‘An analysis of sustainable farming practices among Thompson seedless and Bangalore Blue grape growers, Ph D thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India.

Gupta, Bhavana, Kher S K and Nain M S. 2013. Entrepreneurial behaviour and constraints encountered by dairy and poultry entrepreneurs in Jammu Division of J&K State. Indian Journal of Extension Education. 49 (3&4): 126–9.

Koppen B V, Parthasarthy R and Constantina S. 2002. Poverty dimension of irrigation management transfer in large scale irrigation in Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat (India). International water management institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Misra, R. 2009. ITC choupal fresh: A case in pro poor value chains. Occasional Paper Series No. 8, Coady International Institute.

Nain MS, Singh Rashmi, Sharma JP, Burman RR and Chahal VP. 2015. Participatory identification and prioitization of agri enterprises in national capital region of India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 85(6): 787–91.

Pritchard Bill, Gracy C P and Godwin Michelle. 2010. The Impacts of Supermarket procurement on Farming Communitiesin India: Evidence from Rural Karnataka. Development Policy Review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2010.00491.x

Quio G, Lijuan Z and Klein K K. 2008. Water user associations in inner Mangolia; factors that influence to join. Agricultural Water Management Journal 96(5): 822–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.11.001

Rakesh K, Arya B S and Narwal R S. 2005. Extent and correlates of functional linkage as perceived by farmers. Haryana Agricultural University Journal of Research 35: 71–6.

Rondot P and Collion M H. 2001. Agricultural producer organisation: their contribution to rural capacity building and poverty reduction. Report of workshop, 28-30 June, World Bank, Washington.

Shahroudi A A and Chizari M. 2008. Factors influencing farmer’s attitude toward participation in water users association (A case study in Khorasan-eRazavi Province, Iran).Journal of Science, Technology, Agriculture and Natural Resources 11: 313.

Shingi P M and Chamala S .1997. Improving agricultural extension: a reference manual. Establishing and strengthening farmers’ organizations, Rome.

Singh Rashmi, Nain MS, Sharma JP, Mishra JR, Burman RR. 2014. Institutional convergence of synergistic strengths for developing women agripreneurs. Indian Journal of Extension Education 50 (3&4): 25.

Sonawane S B, Chikkalikar J and Nirban A J. 2001. Utilization of communication sources by farmers for seeking farm information. Maharashtra Journal of Extension Education 20:61–2.

Swanson B E. 2008. Global review of good agricultural extension and advisory services practices. FAO, Rome.

Taherkhani M and Arani G B. 2005. Investigating of factors effecting on villagers’ willingness to form rural cooperatives. Journal of Geography Research 3: 81.

Vedamurthy H S. 2002. ‘A study on arecanut management practices in Shimoga district in Karnataka. M Sc (Agri.) thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences. Dharwad, Karnataka.

Downloads

Submitted

2015-10-05

Published

2015-10-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

R, S. P., NAIN, M. S., SINGH, R., KUMAR, S., & CHAHAL, V. P. (2015). Farmers’ producer organisation in reducing transactional costs: A study of Tamil Nadu Mango Growers Federation (TAMAFED). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 85(10), 1303-1307. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i10.52269
Citation