Effect of transplanting dates and mulching materials on growth, yield and economics of summer squash (Cucurbita pepo) in Uttarakhand hills

MOHAN SINGH; LALIT BHATT; V P SINGH; S K MAURYA; AWANI KUMAR SINGH

doi:10.56093/ijas.v85i12.54232

Authors

MOHAN SINGH Student, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 145
LALIT BHATT Assistant Professor, Vegetable Science, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 145
V P SINGH Associate Professor, Horticulture, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 145
S K MAURYA Assistant Professor, Vegetable Science, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 263 145
AWANI KUMAR SINGH Senior Scientist, Vegetable Science, CPCT, IARI, New Delhi

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i12.54232

Keywords:

Black polyethylene, Economics, Mid-hills, Mulch, Summer squash, Uttarakhand

Abstract

A study was undertaken to investigate the effect of different dates of transplanting and mulching materials on plant growth, yield and economics of summer squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) under rainfed condition in Uttarakhand hills during spring summer season of 2011 and 2012. Summer squash was mulched with black polyethylene, pine needle, FYM and dried leaves along with and without mulched (control) and transplanted at three different dates, i.e. 10 March, 25 March and 9 April in Factorial RBD replicated thrice. During the study, observations on plant height, plant spread, leaf area, days to 50 % flowering, number of harvesting, number of fruits/plant, total yield etc. were recorded. In addition, to assess the profitability of treatments cost of cultivation, net profit and benefit cost ratio were also worked out. Among three transplanting dates, 10 March was found to be best with respect to plant growth characters, total yield (61.35 tonnes/ha), net return (Rupees 452897/ha) and benefit cost ratio (3.82). Similarly, out of four mulches and control, black polyethylene mulch was observed the best with respect to plant growth characters, total yield (68.50 t/ha), net return (Rupees 449732/ha) and benefit cost ratio (3.58). So far interaction between transplanting dates and mulching materials used, out of 15 treatment combinations, D₁M₁ (transplanting on 10 March under black polyethylene) had recorded maximum yield of 76.03 tonnes/ha along with highest net profit of Rupees 582242/ha and benefit cost ratio of 4.27. Based on overall performance, it could be concluded that under the prevalent climatic condition of Uttarakhand hills, treatment combination D₁M₁ (transplanting on 10 March under black polyethylene) is the best and most economical treatment, hence, recommended for commercial cultivation at farmers fields, provided all other scientific management practices are followed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asaduzzaman M, Sultan S and Ali A. 2010. Combined effect of mulch materials and organic manure on the growth and yield of lettuce. American Eruasian Journal of Agricultural Environmental Science 9 (5): 504–8.

Awasthi O P, Singh I S and Sharma B D. 2006. Effect of mulch on soil- hydrothermal regimes, growth and fruit yield of brinjal under arid conditions. Indian Journal of Horticulture 63 (2): 192–4.

Bhatt L, Rana R, Uniyal S P and Singh V P. 2011. Effect of mulch materials on vegetative characters, yield and economics of summer squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) under rainfed mid hill condition of Uttarakhand. Vegetable Science 38 (2): 165–8.

Dixit C K and Majmudar A M. 1995. Effect of mulching on water use efficiency, yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Haryana Journal of Horticulture Science 24 (3-4): 286–91.

Ekinci M and Dursun A. 2009. Effect of different mulch materials on plant growth, some quality parameters and yield of melon (Cucumis melo L.) cultivar in high altitude environmental condition. Pakistan Journal of Botany 41 (4): 1 891–1 901.

Hallidri M. 2001. Comparison of the different mulching materials on growth yield and quality of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Acta Horticulture 559 (1): 49–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.559.3

Mahmood M M Farooq, K Hussain A and Raham S. 2002. Effect of mulching on growth and yield of potato crop. Asian Journal of Plant Science 1 (2): 132–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2002.132.133

Panse V G and Sukhatme P. 1989.Statistical methods for Agricultural workers, 3rd edition, pp 70–99. ICAR New Delhi.

Sari N, Guler H Y, Abak K and Pakyurek Y. 1994. Effect of mulch and tunnel on the yield and harvesting period of cucumber and squash. Acta Horticulture 371 (1): 305–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1994.371.39

Singh B, Kumar M and Singh G C. 2005. Effect of different plastic mulches on growth and yield of winter tomato. Indian Journal of Horticulture 62 (2): 200–2.

Singh V P and Singh P K 2010. Earliness and improved productivity in summer squash and tomato using plastic mulches through front line demonstration in mid–hills of Uttarakhand. (In) National Symposium on Conservation Horticulture, held at Dehradun during 21-23 March, pp 302–3.

Uniyal S P and Mishra A C. 2003. Response of potato to soil moisture and temperature as affected by different mulches. Journal of Indian Potato Association 30 (3-4): 315–7.