Analysis of farmers' communication network and factors of knowledge regarding agro meteorological parameters

K RAVI KUMAR; M S NAIN; RASHMI SINGH; V P CHAHAL; R S BANA

doi:10.56093/ijas.v85i12.54314

Authors

K RAVI KUMAR Ph D Scholar, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
M S NAIN Senior Scientist, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
RASHMI SINGH Principal Scientist, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012
V P CHAHAL Principal Scientist (Agricultural Extension), KAB-I, ICAR, New Delhi 110 012
R S BANA Scientist, Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i12.54314

Keywords:

Climate and weather, Communication network, Crop management, Interpersonal information sources, Knowledge of farmers, Mass media

Abstract

Understanding communication networks bear significant importance for undertaking interventions regarding local information needs. It becomes more important if the issues of sensitivity like climate change and its effect on agriculture has to be dealt. The agricultural sector needs accurate, reliable and timely weather and climate information for daily tactical decisions and long-term planning for crop management. They can potentially alter selection and management of crops based on new information obtained within a few weeks or days of planting. The information systems integrating agricultural educators, researchers, extensionists and farmers need to be introduced for agriculture sector for which sufficient data base regarding the gap between the possessed knowledge and the available knowledge and the information source utilization pattern need to be generated. The present study to find out the factors of the knowledge of farmers regarding climate and weather in relation to crop management and the analysis of farmers' communication network was undertaken in Adilabad district (highly vulnerable to climate change effects) of Telangana state of India. A knowledge test specifically designed was administered to 120 respondents and was found that majority of the respondents had moderate level of knowledge. The socio-economic and psycho-personal variables like education, occupation, family type, land holding, social participation, economic motivation, innovativeness, scientific orientation and risk orientation showed positive and significant relationship with knowledge level and in regression analysis education, scientific orientation were positive and had significant contribution to the knowledge level of respondents. Television, radio, agriculture officer and progressive farmers were categorized into strong group of information sources usefulness. In order to support farm level decisions and minimize the loses in adverse climatic and weather conditions farmers' understanding about interaction of climate and agro-ecosystem need to be bridged through inclusion of farmers' communication network

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alvesson M. 2004. Knowledge Work and Knowledge Intensive Firms. Oxford University Press, London.

Bhagat G R, Nain M S and Nanda R . 2004. Information sources for agricultural technology. Indian Journal of Extension Education 40(1&2):111–2.

Borgatti S P and Halgin D S. 2011.On network theory. Organisation Science 22(5): 1 168–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0641

Demiryiirek K. 2000. ‘The analysis of information systems for organic and conventional hazelnut producers in three villages of the Black sea region, Turkey’. Ph D thesis, The University of Reading, Reading.

Dietz T, Den A and Shwom R. 2007. Support for climate change policy: social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociology. 72(2): 185–214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1526/003601107781170026

FAO. 2005. Agricultural knowledge and information systems for rural development (AKIS/RD). Strategic vision and guiding principles.

Jones S A, Fischhoff B and Lach D. 1999. Evaluating the science –policy interface for climate change research. Climate Change 45: 581–99.

Lazo J K, Kinnel J C and Fisher A. 2000. Expert and layperson perception of ecosystem risk. Risk Analysis 20:179–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.202019

Massey C, Morriss S, Alpass F and Flett R. 2002. Building innovative capacity: a report on an investigation into technological learning in the New Zealand dairy industry. NZ centre for SME Research, Wellington.

O’Brian K, Leichenko R, Kelkar U, Venema H Aandahl G, Thompkins H, Javed A, Bhadwal S, Barg S, Nyggard L and West J. 2004. Mapping vulnerability of multiple stressors: climate change and globalization in India. Global Environmental Change 14:303–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.01.001

Prasad M .1983. ‘Comparative analysis of achievement motivation of rice growers in three states of India’. Ph D thesis , UAS, Bangalore.

Rao V U M, Sabba Rao A V M, Bapuji Rao B, Ramana Rao B V, Sravani C and Venkateswarlu B. 2011. El Nino effect on climate variability and crop production: a case study of Andhra Pradesh. Research Bulletin, CRIDA, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India, p 36.

Rarkasem K, Yimyam N and Rarkesm B .1999. Land use transformation in the mountain mainland Southeast Asia region and the role of indigenous knowledge and skill in forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 257(10):2 035– 43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.11.008

Sarkar S .2009. ‘Farmers’ perception, vulnerability and adaptation strategy to climate change in coastal ecosystem of Sunderban in West Bengal’. M Sc thesis, Division of Agricultural Extension, IARI, New Delhi.

Somasundaram D and Singh S N .1978. Communication gap between extension workers and paddy growing small farmers. Indian Journal of Extension Education 14(3&4):26–33.

Stern P C and Easterling W E .1999. Making Climate Forecasts Matter. National Academy Press, Washington DC.

Supe S V .1969. ‘Factors related to different degrees of rationality in decision making among farmers’. Ph D thesis, IARI, New Delhi.