Effect of different types of mulching on biochemical parameters of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)
342 / 127
Keywords:
Cherry tomato, Lycopene, Mulching, pH, Tomato MarglobeAbstract
Different mulching treatments consisting of two inorganic (black polythene, white polythene) and four organic mulches (FYM, rice straw, dry leaves, sugarcane trash) along with control (without mulching) were used to study their effect of biochemical parameters in two tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) varieties (Cherry tomato and Marglobe). The experiment was conducted at Research Area, Department of Horticulture, DCAST, Selaqui, Dehradun (Uttarakhand) during 2013-2014. Experiment was laid out in factorial randomized block design with seven treatment combinations and each treatment was replicated thrice. It was observed that among all the treatments black polythene mulch showed significantly higher TSS (6.78 0Brix and 6.64 0Brix) and lycopene content (0.39 mg/kg and 0.38 mg/kg) in Cherry tomato and Marglobe varieties. The pH of immature (4.43, 4.57) and mature fruits (4.23, 4.23) was found higher with sugarcane trash mulch in both the varieties followed by other mulches. Among all the treatments, black polythene mulch was found to be the best for tomato cultivation.Downloads
References
Agrawal N, Panigrahi H K, Sharma D and Agrawal R. 2010. Effect of different colour mulches on the growth and yield of tomato under Chhattisgarh region. Indian Journal of Horticulture 67: 295–300.
Aruna P, Sudagar I P, Manivannan M I, Rajangam J and Natarajan S. 2007. Effect of fertigation and mulching for yield and quality in tomato cv. PKM-1. Asian Journal of Horticulture 2(2): 50–4.
Borthakur P K and R K Bhattacharya. 1992. Organic mulches in guava orchard. Indian Horticulture 37(2): 43–4.
Brault D, Stewart K A and Jenni S. 2002. Growth, development, and yield of head lettuce cultivated on paper and polyethylene mulch. HortScience 37: 92–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.37.1.92
Cozzolino E, Leone V and Piro F. 2010. Biodegradable mulches in tomato production. Informatore-Agrario 66(38): 56–8.
Hedau N K, Ranjan J K, Das B, Pragya, Verma R K and Sofi A A. 2010. Effect of bio-fertilization and mulch treatments on yield attributes and fruit quality of tomato under hill conditions of Uttarakhand. Indian Journal of Horticulture 67(Special Issue): 259–62.
Hooda R S, Singh J, Malik V S and Batra V K. 1999. Influence of direct seeding, transplanting time and mulching of tomato yield. Vegetable Science 26(2): 140–2.
Horvat J, Ban D, Ban S G, Oplanic M and Znidarcic D. 2010. Fertigation and mulching effect bioactive and nutritive compounds of tomato fruit (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Opatija, Hrvatska Zbornik Radova : 634–8.
Parmar H N, Polara N D, and Viradiya R R. 2013. Effect of mulching material on growth, yield and quality of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus Thunb) cv. Kiran. Universal Journal of Agricultural Research 1(2): 30–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujar.2013.010203
Pohrib C, Petrache M, Campeanu G and Neata G. 2011. Studies regarding the effect of mulching with transparent film in greenhouses of Matca vegetable area on quality of tomatoes. Scientific Bulletin Series of Biotechnologies 15: 222–5.
Rashidi M and Gholami M. 2011. Interactive influence of plastic mulch and tillage method on yield, yield components and quality of tomato. American-Eurasian Journal of Agronomy 4(1): 6–12.
Ravi V and Lourduraj A C. 1996. Comparative performance of plastic mulching on soil moisture content, soil temperature and yield of rainfed cotton. Madras Agricultural Journal 83: 709–1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.10.A01092
Sams C E. 1999. Preharvets factors affecting Post harvest texture. Post harvest Biology and Technology 15: 249–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(98)00098-2
Sharma H G and Agrawal Narendra. 2004. Effect of different colour mulches on the growth and yield of tomato under drip irrigation. Plant Archives 4(1): 93–9.
Worthington V. 2001. Nutritional quality of organic versus conventional fruits, vegetables and grains. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 7/2: 161–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/107555301750164244
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.