Profiling mahua (Bassia latifolia) accessions for flower characters and nutraceutical attributes under north Indian conditions


302 / 139

Authors

  • A K SINGH ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Rehmankhera, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226 101
  • ANJU BAJPAI ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Rehmankhera, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226 101
  • H RAVISHANKAR ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Rehmankhera, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226 101
  • V K SINGH ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Rehmankhera, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226 101
  • J P SINGH ICAR-Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Rehmankhera, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226 101

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v86i10.62129

Keywords:

Bassia latifolia, Flower biology, Herkogamy, Proximate composition

Abstract

Mahua (Bassia latifolia Roxb.) is a characteristic spontaneous crop species found scattered throughout the tropics and subtropics of the Indian subcontinent. Categorized as an underutilized fruit crop, there is considerable scope to evaluate and characterize the available diverse germplasm in natural stands for promoting its utilization on commercial scale. Keeping the importance of variability in view, 24 accessions collected from different diversity hot spots of the country during 2006-2010 were asexually propagated on seedling rootstocks, planted in the field gene bank and evaluated for flower biology, physicochemical and nutraceutical parameters of the fruit. Approach herkogamy demonstrated by spatial separation of sex organs, existed in the species as an out-crossing mechanism allowing gene flow and genetic introgression in natural stands that contributed to the prevailing diversity. The pollen was 45-55 μm in size, anemophily coexisting with geitonogamy appeared to be the mechanism of pollen transfer. Thus, the flower biology demonstrated floral attributes that accounted for cross pollination resulting in genetic introgression and generation of appreciable diversity in natural stands, emphasizing needs of its characterization for profitable utilization. Based on the attributes, CISH M-4, CISH M-3 and CISH M-8 showed promise in respect of different fruit quality parameters. CISH M-4 outscored others with regard to juice content (65.42 %), pomace (37.94), TSS (26.40 0Brix), Total sugar (23.497 %), Vit C content (64.163 mg/100g) and antioxidant value (44.483 mg AEAC/g). Lack of improved cultivars for commercial utilization, can thus be attended by focused evaluation of mahua germplasm accessions for the fruit quality parameters and their exploitation in further crop improvement programmes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Belavady B and Balasubramanian S C. 1959. Nutritive value of some Indian fruits and vegetables. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 29: 151–63.

Benzie I F F and Strain J J. 1996. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of ‘‘antioxidant power”: The FRAP assay. Analytical Biochemistry 239: 70–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1996.0292

Castro S, Silveira P and Navarro L. 2008. How Does Secondary Pollen Presentation Affect The Fitness of Polygala Vayredae (Polygalaceae). American Journal of Brotany 95(6): 706–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.2007329

Chatterjee A and Prakashi S C. 2003. The treatise on Indian medicinal plants Vol 4, 56 p., National Institute of Science

Communication and Information Resources, New Delhi.

Daniel J N and Hegde N G. 2007. Tree-borne oilseeds in agroforestry. (In) Proceedings of the National Seminar on Changing Global Vegetable Oils Scenario: Issues and Challenges before India, Indian Society of Oilseeds Research, Hyderabad, India, pp 263–76.

Ghadge S V and Raheman H. 2005. Biodiesel production from mahua (Madhuca indica) oil having high free fatty acids. Biomass Bioener. 28: 601–05. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.11.009

Ishii H S and Sakai S. 2001. Temporal variation in floral display size and individual floral sex allocation in racemes of Narthecium asiaticum (Liliaceae). American Journal of Botany 9(3): 441–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.3.441

Jayasree B., Harishankar N and Rukmini C. 1998. Chemical composition and biological evaluation of Mahua flowers. Journal of Oil Technologists Association of India 30: 170–72.

Kapilan N and Reddy R P. 2008. Evaluation of methyl esters of mahua oil (Madhuca indica) as diesel fuel. Journal of Oil DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-007-1179-5

Chemists Society 85: 185–88.

Kelly L. 1997. A dadistic analysis of Asarum (Aristolodiaceae) and implications for the evolution of herkogamy. American Journal of Botany 84(12): 1 752–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2446475

Kim D O, Chun O K, Kim Y J, Moon H Y and Lee C Y. 2003. Quantification of polyphenolics and their antioxidant capacity in fresh plums. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 51: 6 509 – 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0343074

Kundu M. 2012. Madhuca longifolia (Koenig) J. F. Macb. Seed Leaflet No. 156 January 2012 Forest and Landscape, University of Copenhagen.

Kuruvilla P K. 1989. Pollination biology, seed-setting and fruit setting of Madhuca indica. Indian Forester 115: 22–8.

Maiti C S and Mitra S K. 2002. Studies on genetic resources of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophylus Lamk) in West Bengal. Horticulture Journal 15: 33–43.

Nathan P T, Karuppudurai T, Raghuram H and Ganapathy M. 2009. Bat foraging strategies and pollination of Madhuca latifolia (Sapotaceae) in southern India. Acta Chiropterologica 11(2): 435–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3161/150811009X485657

Patel. M. and Naik S N. 2010. Flowers of Madhuca indica J.F. Gmel.: present status and future perspectives. Indian Journal of Natural Products Resources 1: 438–43.

Prasad. R. and Prasad. R. 1991. Mahua: the tree of the poor. Journal of Tropical Forestry 7(3): 171–79.

Ranganna S. 1986. Manual of chemical analysis of fruits and vegetable products. Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Company Ltd, New Delhi,1 112 p.

Sakhyan H P, Sehgal R N and Bhrot N P. 2004. Morphological characters variation in different species of sea buckthorn in cold deserts of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Forestry 27: 129–32.

Sarkar N and Chatterjee B P. 1983. Some structural features of the polysaccharide of mahua (Madhuca indica) flowers. Carbohydrate Resources 112: 113–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6215(83)88271-8

Shu-kang Lee and Pennington T D. 1996. Sapotaceae. Flora of China 15: 205–14

Singh I S, Srivastava A K and Singh V. 1999. Improvement of some underutilised fruits through selection. Journal of Applied Horticulture 1(1): 34–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37855/jah.1999.v01i01.02

Sutaria B P and Magar N G. 1955. Chemical constituent of mahua flowers (B. latifolia). Vitamins, enzymes and miscellaneous analysis and effect of storage. Journal of Indian Chemists Society 18: 59–64.

Takebajashi N and Morrell P L. 2001. Do Self-fertilization are evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and macro evolutionary approach. American Journal of Botany 8(7): 1 143–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3558325

The Wealth of India. 1962. A Dictionary of Indian Raw Materials and Industrial Products-Raw Materials. Vol 6, pp 207–15.

Publications & Information Directorate, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi.

Downloads

Submitted

2016-10-05

Published

2016-10-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SINGH, A. K., BAJPAI, A., RAVISHANKAR, H., SINGH, V. K., & SINGH, J. P. (2016). Profiling mahua (Bassia latifolia) accessions for flower characters and nutraceutical attributes under north Indian conditions. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 86(10), 1320–3. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v86i10.62129
Citation