Response of rhizobium inoculation on growth and productivity of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-greacum) under salt stress condition
274 / 232
Keywords:
Fenugreek, Growth, Rhizobium, SalinityAbstract
Soil salinity is a major restriction to crop production in many areas of the world. Crops growing in salt-affected soils may suffer from many physiological stress and ion toxicity which then lead to reduced growth and productivity. The present study was under taken on the effect of salinity and rhizobium inoculated seeds on plant growth and productivity of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-greacum L.) cultivars (NDM-17 and Pusa Kasauri). The pot experiment was conducted in completely randomized block design with three replicates. Two sets of pot trails were maintained in which one inoculated with effective rhizobium strain (Rhizobium meliloti) while other set was uninoculated. Both sets were irrigated with saline water of different electrical conductivities (0, 3, 6, 7, 10, 12 and 14 dS/m). Salinity stress registered the highest detrimental effects on growth and productivity. Present findings revealed that the inoculated seeds with effective rhizobium strain minimized the deleterious effect of salinity at all levels. The maximum growth and productivity was found in NDM-17 in both sets inoculated and uninoculated with rhizobium as compared to Pusa Kasauri.Downloads
References
Abdelmoumen H, Musatapha and Missbah E l. 2009. Germination, growth and nodulation of fenugreek (Trigonella foenumgreacum L.) under salt stress. African Journal of Biotechenology 8(11): 2 496–97.
Agarwal S and Ahmad Z. 2010. Contribution of the rhizobium inoculation on plant growth and productivity of two cultivars of berseem ( Trifolium alexandrinum L.) in saline soil. Asian Journal of Plant Science 9: 344–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2010.344.350
Agarwal S, Kumar A, Singh P K and Singh A. 2011. Responses of some genotypes of finger millet (Eleusine coracana Gaertn.) for their salt tolerance. International Journal of Current Research 3: 45–50.
Ahmad M, Athar M and Baig M B. 1985. Response of legumes to salt stress: Effect on growth and nitrogen status of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). (In) Prosepect of Biosaline Research, Workshop, Karachi, Pakistan.
Asharf M Y, Akhtar K, Hussain F and Iqbal J. 2006. Screening of different accession of three potential grass species from Cholistan desert for salt tolerance. Pakistan Journal of Botany 38: 1 589–97.
Bernard T, Pocard J, Perround B, and Rudulier D. 1986. Variation in the response of salt stressed rhizobium strains to betaines. Archives of Microbiology 143: 359–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00412803
Demiral M. 2005. Comparative response of two olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars to salinity. Turkisn Journal of Agriculture 29: 267–74.
Dhanapackam S and Muhammad M H 2010. Effect of NaCl salinity on growth, nodulation and nitrogen in sesbania grandiflora. Indian Journal of Science and Technology 3(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2010/v3i5.14
Elsheikh E A E and Wood M. 1990. Nodulation and N2 fixation by soybean inoculated with salt-tolerant rhizobium or salt-sensitive bradyrhizobia in saline soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 27: 657–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(95)98645-5
El-Sheikh E A E. 1992. Effect of salinity on growth and nitrogen yield of inoculated and nitrogen fertilizer chick pea ( Cicer arietinum). Archives of Biotechnology 1: 17–28.
Francois L E and Conala. 1994. Growth, seed yield and oil content of canola grown under saline conditions. Agronomy journal 86: 233–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600020004x
Hussian N, Mujeeb F, Tahir M, Hassan N M and Abdul B. 2002. Effectiveness of Rhizobium under salinity stress. Asian Journal of Plant Science 1: 12–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2002.12.14
Katerji N and Oweis T. 2005. Salt tolerance analysis of chickpea, faba bean and durum wheat varieties. Agricultural Water Management 72: 195–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.09.014
Kumara M L, Singh C S and Subbarao. 1974. Root hair infection and nodulation in lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) as influenced by salinity and alkalinity. Plant and Soil 40: 261–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011509
Mass E V and Hoffman G J. 1977. Crop salt tolerance –current assessment. Journal of the irrigation and drainage division of the American Society of Civil Engineering 103: 115–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/JRCEA4.0001137
Murillo-Amador B and Troyo-Dieguez E. 2000. Effect of salinity on germination and seedlings characteristics of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, Quesnsland 40: 433–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/EA99009
Naher N and Alam A K M M. 2010. Germination, growth and nodulation of mungbean ( Vigna radiate L. ) as affected by sodium chloride. Journal of Crop Production 5(2): 8–11.
Naves-Piestun B G and Berstein N. 2001. Salinity induced inhibition of leaf elongation in maize is not mediated by changes in cell wall acidification capacity. Plant Physiology 125: 1 419–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.125.3.1419
Poi S C, Basu T K, Behar K and Srivastav A.1991. Symbiotic effectiveness of different strain of Rhizobium meliloti in selecting inoculating for improvement of productivity of methi (Trigonella foenum-greacum L.). Environment and Ecology 9: 286–7.
Rawson H M, Long M J and Munns R, 1988.Growth and development in NaCl treated plants: Leaf Na and Cl ions conc. do not determine gas exchange of leaf blades in barley. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 15: 519–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9880519
Rout N P and Shaw B P. 2001. Salt tolerance in aquatic macrophytes: ionic relation and interaction. Biology Plant 55: 91–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017978506585
Saeed H A and Elsheikh E A E. 1995. Response of fenugreek (Trigonella foenumgraecum) to inoculation as influenced by salinity, soil texture, chicken manure and nitrogen. Journal of Agricultural Science University of Khartoum 3: 77–90.
Taylor R S, Weaver D B, Wood C W and Santen E V. 2005. Nitrogen application increases yield and early dry matter accumulation in late-planted soybean. Crop Science 45: 854– 58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.0344
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.