Effect of girdling on flowering and fruiting of litchi (Litchi chinensis) in subtropics of Bihar

AMRENDRA KUMAR; S D PANDEY; R K PATEL; KULDEEP SRIVASTAVA; MRITUNJAY TRIPATHI; VISHAL NATH

doi:10.56093/ijas.v87i3.68784

Authors

AMRENDRA KUMAR ICAR-National Research Centre on Litchi, Muzaffarpur, Bihar 842 002
S D PANDEY ICAR-National Research Centre on Litchi, Muzaffarpur, Bihar 842 002
R K PATEL ICAR-National Research Centre on Litchi, Muzaffarpur, Bihar 842 002
KULDEEP SRIVASTAVA ICAR-National Research Centre on Litchi, Muzaffarpur, Bihar 842 002
MRITUNJAY TRIPATHI ICAR-National Research Centre on Litchi, Muzaffarpur, Bihar 842 002
VISHAL NATH ICAR-National Research Centre on Litchi, Muzaffarpur, Bihar 842 002

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i3.68784

Keywords:

Biochemical parameters, Flowering, Girdling, Litchi, Primary branches

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during 2014 and 2015 to study the effect of varied extent of girdling for induction of flowering in litchi (Litchi chinensis sonn.) under Bihar condition. Results indicated that circular girdling of 2mm on 50% primary branches produced more flowering panicle, fruit yield, fruit size, TSS, and TSS/acid ratio in Shahi litchi trees compared to ungirdle (control) trees. Findings also revealed that the wound healing duration of girdled portion increases with increasing the size of girdling notch. The average yields from all girdled treatments were about three to five times higher than control. Gradual decrease in fruit weight was noticed with increase of girdling size in both 25% PB and 50% PB. TSS and TSS/ acid ratio showed decreasing trend while acidity and ascorbic acid content of the fruit showed increasing trend with increase in level of girdling width. All girdled shoots showed more accumulation of carbohydrate in leaves than control. Among the girdled branches, gradual increase in leaf carbohydrate and C/N ratio content and decrease in nitrogen content observed with increase in level of girdling but the nitrogen content of bark showed the reverse trend.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul-Baki A A and Anderson J D. 1973. Vigour determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop Science 13: 630–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183X001300060013x

Ahmad N and Tanki M I. 1997. Effect of planting date, spacing and steckling size on growth and seed yield of carrot (Daucus carota L.). Haryana Journal of Horticultural Sciences 26: 274–6.

Al Mamun M A, Al-Mahmud A, Zakaria M, Hosssain M M and Hossain M T. 2016. Effect of planting times and plant densities of top-shoot cuttings on multiplication of breeder seed potato. Agricultural and Natural Resources 50: 26–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anres.2014.08.001

Amjad M and Anjum M A. 2001. Effect of root size, plant spacing and umbel order on the quality of carrot seed. International Journal of Agriculuture and Biology 3(2): 239–42.

Andriolo J L. 1999.Fluxo de carbono da planta. (In) Fisiologia das culturasprotegidas, p. 13–46. Santa Maria, Editora UFSM.

Asaduzzaman M, Mahmudul H, Mainul H and Moniruzzaman M. 2012. Quality seed production of onion (Allium cepa L.): an integrated approach of bulb size and plant spacing. Jouranl of Agricultural Reserach 50(1): 119–28.

Bahlgerdi M, Aroiee H and Azizi M. 2014. The study of plant density and planting methods on some growth characteristics, seed and oil yield of medicinal pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo var. styriaca, cv. ‘Kaki). American Journal of Life Sciences 2(5): 319–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20140205.21

Curley S.1994. Foliar Nutrition, p 26. Midwest Laboratories, Omaha.

Dematte M E S P, Alves S, Camargo L S and Nagai V. 1978. Seed production in Cucurbita pepo var. melopepo (summer squash) cv. Caserta IAC-1967 under 3 different spacings. Cientifica 6: 165–73 (in Portuguese).

Dongre S M, Mahorkar V K, Joshi P S and Deo D D. 2000. Effect of micronutrients spray on yield and quality of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) cv. Jayanti. Agricultural Science Digest 20: 106–7.

Edelstein M and Nerson H. 2002. Genotype and plant density affect watermelon grown for seed consumption. HortScience 37: 981–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.37.6.981

Edelstein M, Nerson H, Paris H S, Karchi Z, Burger Y and Zohar R. 1985. Hybrid seed production in spaghetti squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) using ethephon and honeybees. Hassadeh 65: 2 416–9 (in Hebrew).

Gerendas J and Fuhrs H. 2013. The significance of magnesium for crop quality. Plant and Soil 368(1): 101–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1555-2

Gray D, Steckel J R A and Ward I A.1983. Studies on carrot seed production. Effects of plant density on yield and components of yield. Journal of Horticultural Science 58(1): 83–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221589.1983.11515093

Gray D, Steckel J R A. 1983. Seed quality in carrots: the effect of seed crop plant density, harvest date and seed grading on seed and seedling variability. Journal of Horticultural Science 58: 393–401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221589.1983.11515135

Guerrero M A, Diaz A A, Heredia Z A and Salinas G J. 1986. A study of carrot seed production in El Bajio. Proceedings of the Triopical Region- American Society of Horticultural Science 23: 272–4.

ISTA. 2012. Seed Testing Rules. International Seed Testing Association, CH- Swizerland.

Kanwar J S, Gill B S and Bal S S. 2000. Response of planting time and density to onion seed yield and quality. Seed Research 28: 212–4.

Kumar K .2005. Effect of plant density, steckling size, pruning and growth regulators on seed crop of carrot (Daucus carota L.). Ph D thesis, Department of Vegetable Science, College of Agriculture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar.

Kumar S, Yadav M K and Yadav Y C. 2012. Effect of foliar application of boron on growth, yield, quality and seed production of Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) cv. Jaunpuri Local. Progressive Agriculture 12(1): 199–202.

Lima M S, Cardoso A I I and Verdial M F. 2003. Plant spacing and pollen quantity on yield and quality of squash seeds. Horticultura Brasileira 21(3): 443–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362003000300005

Loy J B.1988. Improving seed yield in hull-less seeded strains of Cucurbita pepo. Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative 11: 72–3.

Merfield C N, Hampton J G, Wratten S D, Prapanoppasin P and Yeeransiri P. 2010. The effect of plant density on seed yield and quality of carrot (Daucus carota L.) Agronomy Society of New Zealand Special Publication No. l3, Grassland Research and Practice Series No. 14, pp 75–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33584/rps.14.2008.3183

Nerson H. 2002. Relationship between plant density and fruit and seed production in muskmelon. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science 127: 855–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.127.5.855

Nerson H.2005. Effects of fruit shape and plant density on seed yield and quality of squash. Scientia Horticulturae 105: 293–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2004.11.008

Paikray R K, Mishra P J, Mohapatra A K, Haldar J and Panda S. 2001) Response of niger (Guizotia abyssinica) to secondary and micronutrients in acid red soil. Annals of Agricultural Research 22: 140–2.

Pandita V K, Rana S C, Chaudhry D and Kumar V. 2005, Seed productivity and quality in relation to plant spacing in carrot (Daucus carota). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 75(11): 722–4.

Saxena M and Gandhi C P. 2015. Indian horticulture database 2014, National Horticulture Board, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India.

Sharma S K, Singh H and Kohli U K 1999. Influence of boron and zinc on seed yield and quality in radish. Seed Research 27: 154–8.

Vrataric M, Sudaric A, Kovacevic V, Duvnjak T, Krizmanic M, Mijic A. 2006. Response of soybean to foliar fertilization with magnesium sulfate. Cereal Research Commutation 34: 709–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/CRC.34.2006.1.177