Effect of planting densities and varieties on yield and yield associated characters of apple (Malus × dometica) on semi-dwarfing rootstock


282 / 153

Authors

  • K K SRIVASTAVA ICAR-Central Institute of Temperate Horticulture, Old Air Field, Rangreth, Srinagar, J and K 190 007
  • D B SINGH ICAR-Central Institute of Temperate Horticulture, Old Air Field, Rangreth, Srinagar, J and K 190 007
  • DINESH KUMAR ICAR-Central Institute of Temperate Horticulture, Old Air Field, Rangreth, Srinagar, J and K 190 007
  • S R SINGH ICAR-Central Institute of Temperate Horticulture, Old Air Field, Rangreth, Srinagar, J and K 190 007
  • O C SHARMA ICAR-Central Institute of Temperate Horticulture, Old Air Field, Rangreth, Srinagar, J and K 190 007
  • SHIV LAL ICAR-Central Institute of Temperate Horticulture, Old Air Field, Rangreth, Srinagar, J and K 190 007

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i5.70107

Keywords:

Apple, High density planting, MM 106, Yield efficiency, Trunk cross sectional area

Abstract

Four apple (Malus × domestica Borkh) varieties (Starkrimson, Cooper IV, Red Chief, and Mollies Delicious) were planted at 3 planting densities (1600, 1142 and 952 plants / ha) on semi-dwarf rootstock during 2002-03 and data on yield and growth were recorded after 7 years. Results indicated that maximum mean trunk cross sectional area was registered in Mollies Delicious at all the densities (103.79, 92.61 and 77.06 cm2) and lowest (67.01, 75.65 and 80.33 cm2) in Cooper IV. Largest sized fruit (177.80 g/ fruit) recorded in the S3 (952 tree/ha) and minimum (160.73 g/ fruit) in S1 density (1600 tree/ha). Maximum mean yield and yield efficiency were recorded in Starkrimson and Red Chief and minimum yield and yield efficiency in Cooper IV. Density has a detrimental effect on yield efficiency, it was maximum (0.48 kg/cm2) in S3 and minimum (0.21 cm2) in S1 density. The fruit weight increases with decrease in plant density, fruit size has negative correlation with number of fruit tree. Positive correlation was obtained between yield and yield efficiency (0.999) and planting densities with yield efficiency (0.691).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barritt B H, Konishi A S and Dilley M A. 1995. Intensive orchard management performance of three apple cultivars with 23 dwarfing rootstock during 8 seasons in Washington. Fruit Variety Journal 49(3): 158–70.

Fallahi E, Colt W M, Fallahi B and Chun I J. 2002. The importance of apple rootstocks on tree growth, yield, fruit quality, leaf nutrition and photosynthesis with an emphasis on ‘Fuji’. Horticultural Technology 12(1): 38–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.12.1.38

Guglielmo Costa, Emilio Beltrame, Eccher Zerbini Paola and Alberto Pianezzola. 1997. High density planted apple orchard : effect on yield, performance and fruit quality. Acta Horticulturae 451 : 505–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.451.58

Harada T, Kurahashi W, Wakasa Y and Satoh T. 2005. Involment in cell proliferation and cell enlargement in increasing the fruit size of Malus species. Scientia Horticulturae 105 : 447–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2005.02.006

Jackson J E and Middleton. 1986. Progettazione del frutteto per la massima produttivita’ e qualita’. La coltura del melo verso gli anni ‘90”: 309–20.

Jimenez C M and Diaz J B R. 2004.Stastical model estimates potential yields in Golden Delicious and Royal Gala apples before bloom. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Sciences 129(1): 20–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.129.1.0020

Kumar D, Pandey V, Anjaneyala K. and Nath V. 2008. Relationship of trunk cross sectional area with fruit yield, quality and leaf nutrient stations in Allahalbad Safeda guava (Psidium guajava). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 78: 337–9.

Kumar D, Ahmed N and Verma M K. 2012. Studies on high density planting in almond in Kashmir valley. Indian Journal of Horticulture 69 (3): 328–32.

Lakso A N and Corelli Grappadelli L. 1993. Implications of pruning and training. Practices to carbon partitioning and fruit development in apple. Acta Horticulturae 332 : 231–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1992.322.25

Loreti F, Guerriero R and Morini S.1978. Researchers on apple high density plantings. Acta Horticulturae 55:117–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1978.65.16

Mir J I, Ahmed N, Singh D B, Sharma O C, Sharma A, Shafi W, Zaffar S and Hamid Asma. 2016. Effect of planting densities on productivity of different cultivars in apple (Malus domestica). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 86 (8): 1 059–62.

Robinson T L. 2003. Apple-orchard planting system. (In) Apples, pp 345–407. Ferree D C and Warrington I J (Eds). CABI, Wallingford, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995922.0345

Sansavini S and Corelli L. 1991. La potatura e le forme di allevamento del melo. Frutticoltura 10: 29–43.

Sheoran O P, Tonk, Kaushik D S, Hasija L S and Pannu R S. 1998. Statistical Software Package for Agricultural Research Workers. (In) Recent Advances in Information Theory, Statistics and Computer Application, pp 139–43.

Hooda D S and Hasija R C. Department of Mathematics Statistics, CCS HAU, Hisar.

Downloads

Submitted

2017-05-04

Published

2017-05-08

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SRIVASTAVA, K. K., SINGH, D. B., KUMAR, D., SINGH, S. R., SHARMA, O. C., & LAL, S. (2017). Effect of planting densities and varieties on yield and yield associated characters of apple (Malus × dometica) on semi-dwarfing rootstock. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 87(5), 593–596. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i5.70107
Citation