Prioritization of training needs and constraints faced by watershed field functionaries and farmers


234 / 110

Authors

  • BANKEY BIHARI ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248 195
  • LAKHAN SINGH ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248 195
  • RAJESH BISHNOI ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248 195
  • SURESH KUMAR ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248 195

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i5.70118

Keywords:

Rank Based Quotient, Training needs and prioritization, Watershed field functionaries, Watershed components

Abstract

Resource conservation programmes are implemented mostly on watershed basis where people’s participation is an
inbuilt institutional mechanism for ensuring the sustenance and success. Capacity building is pre-requisite for active
involvement of villagers based on their prioritized needs. ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation,
Dehradun is working as a nodal agency for organizing training programmes for field functionaries involved in watershed development and management. Present study is an effort to identify, assess and prioritize training needs of the Watershed Development Team (WDT) members and farmers along with office bearers of the watershed committees. In total, 118 farmer respondents of high and mid hills, 36 from lower hills and plains and 35 WDT members were taken for the study. Responses were recorded on five point continuum in form of ranks, viz I, II, III, IV and V. Frequency for each rank was obtained through matrix analysis. Rank Based Quotient (RBQ) for each rank of individual need (sub component) was calculated separately and was summed up to get the final RBQ score. Likewise, it was done for all the sub components of watershed and overall priority ranking was computed on the basis of final RBQ scores. Though, almost all the respondents were from the watershed areas and most of them were office bearers of the WDT committees but their perception in terms of training needs was reflected inclined to personal gains, not towards common cause or community based activities. Equity and transparency were the high priority training needs in case of farmers but for WDT members, these were the least prioritized needs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lynton R P and Pareek U. 1990. Training for Development, pp 184–6. SAGE Publication, New Delhi.

Mishra D C. 1990. New Directions in Extension Training. Directorate of Extension, Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi.

Nongtdu G, Bordoloi R, Saravanan R, Singh R and Singh N U. 2012. Training needs of agricultural extension personnel in Meghalaya. Indian Journal of Hill Farming 25(1): 1–8.

Sabarathanam V E. 1988. Manuals of Field Experience Training for ARS Scientists. NAARM, Hyderabad.

Sharma Neerja, Arora R K and Kher Sanjay. 2010. KVK trainings for farmers in hilly areas of Poonch district - identifying need of hour. Journal of Hill Agriculture. 1(2):1405.

Singh Lakhan and Sinha B P. 2005. Development orientation of watershed project functionaries. Indian Journal of Extension Education 41 (1&2): 12–9.

Singh Lakhan, Sinha B P and Rao D U M. 2004. People’s participation in Doon valley watershed-Lessons for watershed management. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education 4 (1&2): 53–7.

Van den Ban A W and Hawkins H S. 1999. Agricultural development: Opportunities and Threats for farmers and implications for extension organizations. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 6(3): 145–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13892249985300291

Downloads

Submitted

2017-05-05

Published

2017-05-08

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

BIHARI, B., SINGH, L., BISHNOI, R., & KUMAR, S. (2017). Prioritization of training needs and constraints faced by watershed field functionaries and farmers. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 87(5), 597–602. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i5.70118
Citation