Response of budding methods and time on bud success and budding growth of peach (Prunus persica) on different rootstocks


259 / 101

Authors

  • RAFIQ AHMAD SHAH Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir 180 009
  • ARTI SHARMA Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir 180 009
  • V K WALI Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir 180 009
  • PARSHANT BAKSHI Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir 180 009
  • RAKESH KUMAR Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir 180 009
  • RUCKU GUPTA Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir 180 009

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i5.70196

Keywords:

Budding, Bud take, Girth, Rootstock, Scion length, Sprouting

Abstract

A present study was undertaken, to determine the most appropriate time and method of budding of peach (Prunus persica Batsch) cv. Shan-e-Punjab on different rootstocks to achieve the maximum bud take and budding growth, by budding peach cv. Shan-e-Punjab on peach, plum and apricot rootstock by T, inverted T and patch from 15 June to 1 August at 15 days interval. The results showed that inverted 'T' budding took minimum number of days for full sprouting in plum (17.99) and apricot (18.24) rootstock. Whereas, in peach T budding took 17.58 days for same. Among different dates, plants budded on 15th July took minimum number of days to full sprouting in peach (13.88), plum (14.66) and apricot (14.21) rootstocks. Budding on 1 July recorded maximum bud take success with 93.33% in peach, 86.66% in plum and 86.66% in apricot. Maximum scion length and girth were recorded on 1 July in peach (49.23 cm and 6.29 mm), plum (48.15 cm and 6.07 mm) and apricot (38.58 cm and 6.09 mm) respectively after 120 days after budding (DAB). Inverted T budding produces maximum scion length and girth in plum (37.73 cm and 4.98 mm) and apricot (32.83 cm and 5.10 mm). Whereas, the maximum scion length and girth (41.76 cm and 5.30 mm) in peach were observed in T after 120 DAB. From the present studies, it can be concluded that budding through inverted 'T' and T on 1 July gave maximum bud take and budding growth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad I, Cheng Z, Liu T, Nan W, Ejaz M, Khan M A and Wasila H. 2012. Effect of different time of budding on the bud take success of peach on peach rootstock. Advances in Environmental Biology 6:1 848–52.

Ahmad S, Munir M , Bostan N, and Fazal R. 2015. Effects of budding methods and time intervals on bud take success in seedless guava (Psidium guajava l.). Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 10:146–51.

Akhtar I, Hussain S A, and Nawab A. 2000. Effect of different time of budding of apricot on peach root stock. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 16: 163–5.

Ali J, Noori I, and Hama S F. 2012. Utilization of wild pears rootstocks as a natural resource for loquat production under rainfed condition in sulaimani governorate. Tikrit University Journal for Humanities: .19.

Baryła P and Kapłan M. 2012. The effect of the time of budding of mahaleb cherry (Prunus mahaleb L.) seedlings on the quality of maiden trees of sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) ‘ŁUTÓWKA’. Acta Agrobotanica 65: 163–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2012.034

Chandel J S, Negi K.S, and Jindal K K., 1998. Studies on vegetative propagation in kiwi (Actinidia deliciosa Chev.). Indian Journal of Horticulture 55: 52–4.

Dwivedi S K and Singh B. 1999. Studies on top working of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) in Ladakh. Progressive Horticulture 31: 1–2.

Dwivedi S K, Attery D P and Elipaljor. 2000. Standardisation of budding in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) in cold arid conditions of Ladakh. Progressive Horticulture 32: 117–20.

Hartman H T, Kester D E, Davies F T and Geneve R L. 2007. Plant Propagation: Principles and Practices, 7th edn, pp 199–248, 411–60. Prentice-Hall of India Pvt Ltd, New Delhi.

Hartmann H T, Kester D E, Davies F T J R and Geneve L R. 2002. Plant Propagation: Principles and Practices, 7th edn, p 880. Regents Prentice Hall International Editions, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

Joshi P S, Jadhao B J and Chaudhari G V. 2011. Studies on vegetative propagation in custard apple. Asian Journal of Horticulture 6(1): 261–3.

Kumar D, Phatak R K and Ali W. 1994. Studies on effect of duration and methods of budding in bael. Indian Journal of Horticulture 51: 150–3.

Panse V G and Sukhatme P V. 2000. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. Publication and Information Division, ICAR, New Delhi. Pathak R K, Wahid A and Dwivedi R. 1996. Top working in aonla. Indian Horticulture 40: 27–8.

Rayya A, Kasim M S, Shaheen M A, Yehia T A and Ali E L. 2009. Morphological and anatomical evaluation of different budding and grafting methods and times of neplus ultra almond cultivar. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 5: 253–62.

Singh J and Singh H. 1986. Effect of budding and plant growth regulation on the bud-take in plums (Prunus salicina Lindl.). Research Development Reporter 3: 60–7.

Tripathi A and Kumar R. 2004. Studies on the effect of method and time of budding in bael (Aegle marmelos L.). Haryana Journal of Horticultural Sciences 33: 195–8.

Zenginbal H, Özcan M, Haznedar A and Demir T. 2007. Comparisons of methods and time of budding in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa A. Chev). International Journal of Natural and Engineering Sciences 1: 23–8

Downloads

Submitted

2017-05-08

Published

2017-05-08

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SHAH, R. A., SHARMA, A., WALI, V. K., BAKSHI, P., KUMAR, R., & GUPTA, R. (2017). Response of budding methods and time on bud success and budding growth of peach (Prunus persica) on different rootstocks. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 87(5), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i5.70196
Citation